Conquer Club

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:09 pm**

Are alliances in 3 player games dishonorable? I believe that total alliances in 3 player games are dumb. These games are every man/woman for himself. What do you all think???

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:57 pm**

risk is risk

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:59 pm**

it's risk!! there are no rules in real war, so there are very few in a board game simulating one!

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:05 pm**

P Gizzle wrote:it's risk!! there are no rules in real war, so there are very few in a board game simulating one!

I said nothing about RULES just asked if it was dishonorable

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:07 pm**

boogiesadda wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:it's risk!! there are no rules in real war, so there are very few in a board game simulating one!
I said nothing about RULES just asked if it was dishonorable

no it's not dishonorable. hey, if you want to win, you win, if that means stepping over some people's head, do it.

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:30 pm**

lol i set my cousins up in real life by pointing out things they have done to eachother and they attack eachother like crazy, does that count as an alliance that gives me the game? since they never attack me but i get the bonuses and suddenly sweep them lol its fun *sigh* the good ol days

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:32 pm**

I personally enjoy fighting two people at once...

Especially after one of the parties attacks the other

Then I sit back and watch the civil war.

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:23 am**

i won a game because these two guys just sat there and attacked each other, and another one when there were three left, one guy JUST attacked the other and i won

Posted: **Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:47 pm**

a temp alliance is sometimes necessary...but if your with good players they will attack strongest player...otherwise why bother....however...joining with a friend and having an immidiate alliance would be a great way to gain points...anounce it...then kill the other player...then duke it out....not technically cheating...not a secret alliance right.....dishonarable......beyond all doubt....

Posted: **Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:48 pm**

Alliances in any capacity are dishonorable!! Alliance makers should be banned!!

LOL!! Where are ya Qeeeester?

Posted: **Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:48 pm**

I think the jury is 50/50 from the last poll I did a few weeks ago. I'm now pretty much on the side that stays out of alliances in a 3 player game.

Tals

Posted: **Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:51 pm**

Alliance in 3 player game = you're fucked. Next please.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:08 pm**

If it is the two weak guys teaming up on the guy thats about to win, then i am fine with it.

if it is two guys teaming up on the third guy for some other reason, the third guy shouldnt have gotten into that situation and messed it up for himself.

In war, different groups join together and split up all the time. its not dishonorable in real war, so why should it be dishonorable here?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:45 pm**

War...dishorable.....funny comparison wa!

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:31 pm**

In the end there can only be one winner. the two in the alliances will have to kill each other eventually, so if they want to risk screwing themselves over, it's fine by me.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:55 pm**

Whatever..... I prefer not to join sides in a 3 way game.

Conquer Club

Alliances in 3 player games

Alliances in 3 player games

dishonarable at times...