Conquer Club

Posted: **Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:29 pm**

question when two ppl are tied what is the decider beetwen who gets what place?

5 dminus 2439 307 6-0 Colonel
6 Robinette 2439 115 7-2 Colonel

Posted: **Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:44 pm**

... you gotta be kidding me. Read what you see. Figure out the difference between the two.

Or am I feeding the trolls here?

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:13 am**

hendy wrote:question when two ppl are tied what is the decider beetwen who gets what place?

5 dminus 2439 307 6-0 Colonel
6 Robinette 2439 115 7-2 Colonel

I already answered this today in a different thread, but if the score is tied, whoever joined first is listed first.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:14 am**

AK_iceman wrote:
hendy wrote:question when two ppl are tied what is the decider beetwen who gets what place?

5 dminus 2439 307 6-0 Colonel
6 Robinette 2439 115 7-2 Colonel

I already answered this today in a different thread, but if the score is tied, whoever joined first is listed first.

It isn't based on more games played?

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:17 am**

A Mans Part wrote:It isn't based on more games played?

It could be, theres like 3 things I remember lack saying about this, but I dont remember the order they go in. You could be right too, unfortunately both of our guesses are correct right now tho.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:24 am**

My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:34 am**

Pretty sure its number of games played

1001 itfcmn 1060 90
1002 LEONE 1060 45
1003 a1b1 1060 5
1004 86% Gypsy 1060 1
1005 kbchilla 1059 287
1006 Lkysam 1059 14
1007 Timboa844 1059 11
1008 BiteMe 1058 79
1009 PBAndrew 1058 43
1010 blackhawk3 1058 17
1011 GodSmack 1058 1
1012 Hooperjetc 1057 19
1013 De Prins 1057 18
1014 JerseyPsyc 1057 10
1015 Craft 1057 5

Thats from the scoreboard, in all cases its the person who has played more that is ahead. 3rd column is score, fourth column is games played.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:06 am**

reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:53 pm**

well well... I didn't mean to cause a fuss...

I assumed it was because he was already #5 and I moved up from behind... so it makes sense to me that I'd be listed under him...

But it won't change until I finish a game, as he has NO active games going...

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:02 pm**

reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

get away fro my thread Troll

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:03 pm**

kc-jake wrote:... you gotta be kidding me. Read what you see. Figure out the difference between the two.

Or am I feeding the trolls here?

First of all you dont even know second you don't even no what a troll is do you?

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:47 pm**

I have absolutly no idea what you are trying to tell me

[quote="Robinette"]well well... I didn't mean to cause a fuss...

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:49 pm**

Robinette, don't mind the kids... just ignore them like we all do.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:59 pm**

A Mans Part wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
hendy wrote:question when two ppl are tied what is the decider beetwen who gets what place?

5 dminus 2439 307 6-0 Colonel
6 Robinette 2439 115 7-2 Colonel

I already answered this today in a different thread, but if the score is tied, whoever joined first is listed first.

It isn't based on more games played?

it should be

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:22 pm**

reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Posted: **Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:40 pm**

P Gizzle wrote:
A Mans Part wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
hendy wrote:question when two ppl are tied what is the decider beetwen who gets what place?

5 dminus 2439 307 6-0 Colonel
6 Robinette 2439 115 7-2 Colonel

I already answered this today in a different thread, but if the score is tied, whoever joined first is listed first.

It isn't based on more games played?

it should be

I just reviewed the scoreboard and there are 45 ties, and even some triple ties, in the top 250 (Wow... 93 people, or 37%... who would've guessed there would be that many ties).
But the point is that in EVERY case the player with the most games was listed 1st. In one tie where the game count was the same, it was the player who had joined 1st that was on top.

Conclusion... Everybody is telling me I am Number 6, just like in "The Prisoner".

The opening title sequence begins with a visual of a cloudless blue sky and the incongruous sound of thunder. As the theme music begins, the view pans down to reveal the future Number 6 driving in his Lotus Seven to arrive at the office of a superior, before whom he mounts a fierce (but inaudible) argument, apparently ending in his resignation. The hero then drives home. Returning to his flat, he quickly packs his possessions, including photographs of a tropical white sand beach (possibly a clue to his intended destination). A hearse pulls up and a tall pallbearer approaches the front door. A white gas then floods the room through the keyhole, which renders Number 6 unconscious. The hero awakens in the Village, whose decor and people are of peculiar nautical style and bright colours.

The following dialogue exchange runs over the opening titles of most episodes. The questioner is Number 6 and the respondent is Number 2, the Village chairman, a role occupied by a different man or woman in almost every episode (some actors played the role multiple times — as the reference to the "new Number 2" indicates):

"Where am I?"
"In the Village."
"What do you want?"
"Information."
"Whose side are you on?"
"That would be telling.... We want information. Information!"
"You won't get it."
"By hook or by crook, we will."
"Who are you?"
"The new Number 2."
"Who is Number 1?"
"You are Number 6."
"I am not a number — I am a free man!"

Posted: **Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:03 am**

Wouldn't it make more sense to award it to the one who played the least number of games, since they achieved that score in fewer games.

Posted: **Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:32 am**

well the same sort of logic can be said about the person with more games...

They've played more games so they have been able to keep their score up.

Posted: **Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:58 pm**

and by the way its who ever has the most games played is the 1 that gets the top spot

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:49 am**

reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:03 am**

reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Post whore. ^^^

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:14 am**

AK_iceman wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Post whore. ^^^

No one is taking my subtle hint. :wink:

Have to keep trying to get the point across.

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:49 am**

reverend_kyle wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Post whore. ^^^

No one is taking my subtle hint.

Have to keep trying to get the point across.

Down at the 1000 point area you are nearly always tied with someone, so its not always temporary. It was at most a week ago when you had 100 less posts.

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:52 am**

gavin_sidhu wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:My question is..

In the end, does it really matter? The tie is very very temporary.

Post whore. ^^^

No one is taking my subtle hint.

Have to keep trying to get the point across.

Down at the 1000 point area you are nearly always tied with someone, so its not always temporary. It was at most a week ago when you had 100 less posts.

and when your at that area your not bragging about being 1285 on the scoreboard :roll:

Posted: **Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:55 am**

Well he is averaging (for his career) 25 posts a day. So yeah, a week ago he would have have almost 200 less!

Conquer Club

We have a colonel tie on the SB

We have a colonel tie on the SB

Re: We have a colonel tie on the SB

Re: We have a colonel tie on the SB

Re: We have a colonel tie on the SB

Re: We have a colonel tie on the SB

Re: We have a colonel tie on the SB