by TuckerCase on Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:46 pm
I'm fairly sure this does qualify as cheating. If these two came into the game with a truce odds are they know each other, or at least talked about the game before hand in PM's or whatever. Even if they announced the truce on turn one, it would still have been created outside of the chat. As I understand it the spirit of the rule intends for all diplomacy to be done inside the games in plain view of the other players. It's hardly fair to be able to go into a singles game with someone you are personally friends with, because if you make a deal with that person to insure you are the two last people left you pretty much know that truce is set in stone. The person won't betray you. If you have to use diplomacy inside the game you can't trust anyone.
player: Tucker, truce on the iceland/greenland border?
TuckerCase: Of course.
(TuckerCase invades greenland the next turn.)
And I disagree with Romber that it's somehow less wrong because someone will get screwed eventually. Someone will, yes, but the odds of them surviving until the final two are drastically and unfairly increased.