Conquer Club

We now have 3 expand maps out there. All similar, but with slightly different gamplay. So, which do you like best and why?

Personaly I like AOR: might because there are more villages and resource pairs than fudal wars, and more than 1 objective point then in Magic.

Feudal

Its fun and its easier to understand than AOM and AOR.

AoR: magic.

I really like the feel of the map, with the army decay and everything. its like there really is a snowstorm, and if you arent in a castle, village or resource, your armies are going to die, just like they would in real life if you left them out in a blizzard all night.

Feudal looks ok, but i havent gotten a chance to play on it yet.

I played Might to death, and just won 5/6 magic's (losing to Clive), but haven't played Feudal (so I set up a game to try it). Nonetheless, I'd say Magic once the bugs are ironed out - it's different form might, but that's not a bad thing, can still go to huge bonuses, and doesn't have the he who dares wins in terms of attacking so firmly set (it's easier to come back from losing a castle).

i havent finished my game on feudal..
but im an aor lover through and through!!

lord voldemort wrote:i havent finished my game on feudal..
but im an aor lover through and through!!

DiM for president '08!

can i vote all 3?
i love the fact that despite having the same conquest gameplay as a base start, each map evolved into something unique due to the features implemented on each map.

i like the following:

aor might: the fast and furious action and the 1v1 in fog of war

aor magic: the slightly slowed down action, the need to build up your empire and the frostbyte.

feudal war: the even slower development that leads to lengthy attrition battles.

i think the 3 maps offer an option for everybody. be it fast speed games or lengthy battles be it resources or bombardments.

The1exile wrote:I played Might to death, and just won 5/6 magic's (losing to Clive), but haven't played Feudal (so I set up a game to try it). Nonetheless, I'd say Magic once the bugs are ironed out - it's different form might, but that's not a bad thing, can still go to huge bonuses, and doesn't have the he who dares wins in terms of attacking so firmly set (it's easier to come back from losing a castle).

indeed castles are no longer that important and a person with villages and resource pairs can still make a comeback. also i have worked on limiting the advantage of going first and i can say i'm very happy. i just played a 3 p game where i went last but still won.

i just started a bunch of AoR magic games and a few Feudal games.

Go gamefinder if you want to test your strategy out for the new maps. all terminator.

PS: i hope AoR 3 will be the best of all. when will we be seeing that one?

wcaclimbing wrote:i just started a bunch of AoR magic games and a few Feudal games.

Go gamefinder if you want to test your strategy out for the new maps. all terminator.

PS: i hope AoR 3 will be the best of all. when will we be seeing that one?

i'll start work in the second half of january

DiM wrote:

wcaclimbing wrote:i just started a bunch of AoR magic games and a few Feudal games.

Go gamefinder if you want to test your strategy out for the new maps. all terminator.

PS: i hope AoR 3 will be the best of all. when will we be seeing that one?

i'll start work in the second half of january

yeah looking forward to it too, your gfx skills are going through the roof.

I'd go with might. That is the only one i understand and besides i really don't like them maps much

feudal

*waits for money from gimil*

cena-rules wrote:feudal

*waits for money from gimil*

slips cena a 10 bill for his hard work . . .

AOR: Might -----> Crappy game play settings but best graphics.
Feudal Wars ----> Boring graphics

AOR: Magic------> Don't know yet.

MAGIC!!