Page 1 of 2
why do we always lose to cooks
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:49 amby itskkkken
there seems to be a common behavour lately ... every time there is a cook in the game we all lose to the cook..
Any one else notice this ?
slainte
ken
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:06 amby Hrvat
No, not really.
I just checked your games... ( It is a sloooowwww day
)
On your first page (Game finder) you have played over 25 games where player with Cook rating was taking part.
You have won 4
You have lost 1 (a 2 player game I think)
It is inevitable that low rated player will win a game sooner or later
As I said, it is a slow day...
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:11 amby Kugelblitz22
It's KKK Ken?
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:19 amby Uberwald
...... just don't play cooks
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:17 pmby the_fatty
im a cook...
if u lose to cooks, we should start to play some games
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:32 pmby owenshooter
who is this "WE" you are speaking of?-0
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:37 pmby billy07
i once played a cook that played better esc game than most people under 1800 play.
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:39 pmby brianm
Bring it.
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:41 pmby Strife
brianm wrote:Bring it.
You're not a cook...
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:46 pmby owenshooter
brianm wrote:Bring it.
you have 4 games going, mr. freemium... soo, even if he did want to "bring it", he'd have to wait for one of your 4 games to finish..-0
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:50 pmby brianm
Hey I just started a new one today.
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:04 pmby baseballer72
ive noticed that and i hate it i get ready to advance to the next level then i lose to some noob and then i lose more than 35 points crazy for losing to some1 who got lucky it seems lik they get advantages like dice and drops
Posted:
Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:57 pmby owenshooter
baseballer72 wrote:i get ready to advance to the next level then i lose to some noob
says the guy with 35 games under his belt...-0
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:06 amby Kaplowitz
owenshooter wrote:baseballer72 wrote:i get ready to advance to the next level then i lose to some noob
says the guy with 35 games under his belt...-0
MULTI!
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:33 pmby wrestler1ump
I know Thetheft is a cook, but I can't imagine anyone getting beaten by him. Myself on the other hand, I used to be a cook but am now a private.
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:38 pmby wacicha
I had 4 cooks I was working with and now have none. lol One who asked me to help him then stated when I told him what I want done so we could work said "Sorry I do not play like that". I hope he is doing ok
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:43 pmby Kalten
hey im a cook. 1ce i actually had to defend from 3 players while my Sh*thead partners all missed turns and lost. i f*ucking have horrible luck with partners
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 5:50 pmby wacicha
What I meant when I said work with was I was teaching them a stratigy to help move them up in rank. This does two things. #1 builds a better community player and #2 (self preservation) when I loss to them they are no longer cooks so my point lose is a little bit better.
My philosophy is .
"TRAIN A COOK TODAY LOSE TO A SARGENT TOMORROW"
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:22 pmby feralbiatch
why do we always lose to cooks?
Cause they control our bowels with what we consume.
Its better to let them win..
You want to know what you're eating. *nods
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:26 pmby The Weird One
I was briefly a cook due to bad dice and nothing else. decently good players can be cooks.
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:32 pmby Strife
wacicha wrote:What I meant when I said work with was I was teaching them a stratigy to help move them up in rank. This does two things. #1 builds a better community player and #2 (self preservation) when I loss to them they are no longer cooks so my point lose is a little bit better.
My philosophy is .
"TRAIN A COOK TODAY LOSE TO A SARGENT TOMORROW"
Isn't it sergeant?
Posted:
Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:54 pmby wacicha
Hmmm dam spelling police. I never ever said I can spell.
Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:51 amby Strife
wacicha wrote:Hmmm dam spelling police. I never ever said I can spell.
I guess you're only wise not smart, eh?
Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:08 amby wacicha
Strife wrote:wacicha wrote:Hmmm dam spelling police. I never ever said I can spell.
I guess you're only wise not smart, eh?
there are different types of smart there is nerd smart or street smart or even smart a-s, but I do not mind if you feel I am ignorant.
Posted:
Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:09 amby Strife
wacicha wrote:Strife wrote:wacicha wrote:Hmmm dam spelling police. I never ever said I can spell.
I guess you're only wise not smart, eh?
there are different types of smart there is nerd smart or street smart or even smart a-s, but I do not mind if you feel I am ignorant.
It was a joke.