WHO THINKS CONQUER CLUB SHOULD BE A DEMOCRACY
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:32 pmthere are benefits
(like voting to ban whump)
(like voting to ban whump)
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
WHO THINKS CONQUER CLUB SHOULD BE A DEMOCRACY
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=37977
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:32 pmPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:36 pmI think it should be a republic, which it kind of is. A select group of people vote and have athourity. But I think that the people of CC should select the select, the best candidate or the one with the most to offer. If it were a democracy then we would have raving idiots, such as this 'Whump' with their own little slice of power.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:39 pmNo, people are stupid.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:39 pmhecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:39 pmStrife wrote:I think it should be a republic, which it kind of is. A select group of people vote and have athourity. But I think that the people of CC should select the select, the best candidate or the one with the most to offer. If it were a democracy then we would have raving idiots, such as this 'Whump' with their own little slice of power.
wrestler1ump making decisions about cc... well, apart from being scary, that's impossible. wicked hates him. achilles hates him. EVERYBODY hates him.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:40 pmWell he's is a person from CC so he would get a vote...demon7896 wrote:Strife wrote:I think it should be a republic, which it kind of is. A select group of people vote and have athourity. But I think that the people of CC should select the select, the best candidate or the one with the most to offer. If it were a democracy then we would have raving idiots, such as this 'Whump' with their own little slice of power.
wrestler1ump making decisions about cc... well, apart from being scary, that's impossible. wicked hates him. achilles hates him. EVERYBODY hates him.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:41 pmif we would go by this republic, who would we vote?
heck, let's change the poll.
nominations for a week
heck, let's change the poll.
nominations for a week
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:42 pmheck, how do you change a poll
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:45 pmI THINK WE SHOULD POST IN CAPS ALL THE TIME SO THAT EVERYONE CAN SEE OUR POSTS. JUST IN CASE.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:50 pmI can't see it can you type louder?jnd94 wrote:I THINK WE SHOULD POST IN CAPS ALL THE TIME SO THAT EVERYONE CAN SEE OUR POSTS. JUST IN CASE.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:23 pm0ojakeo0 wrote:hecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:27 pmSpockers wrote:0ojakeo0 wrote:hecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:15 amAll hail the Lacktatorship!!!
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:24 amOligarchy all the way!
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:34 am...as long as democrats don't run it. 
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:37 amI prefer lacktatorship.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:49 amhecter wrote:No, people are stupid.
well said
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:52 amPower to the Turtle!
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:11 pmi think we should make an official poll (that lack should run) and pick the top 50 candidates to be mods, then narrow it down to a number like 15 or 10. sry lack, but its better if the members of CC chose the mods and not u by urself
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:12 pmkepp lack in power though, hes good at his job
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:22 pmthe_fatty wrote:i think we should make an official poll (that lack should run) and pick the top 50 candidates to be mods, then narrow it down to a number like 15 or 10. sry lack, but its better if the members of CC chose the mods and not u by urself
no way.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:08 pmwcaclimbing wrote:the_fatty wrote:i think we should make an official poll (that lack should run) and pick the top 50 candidates to be mods, then narrow it down to a number like 15 or 10. sry lack, but its better if the members of CC chose the mods and not u by urself
no way.
but then its the mods that WE vote for
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:10 pmColeman wrote:I prefer lacktatorship.
is that what you call it when a turtle breastfeeds? and
exactly what is the colour and texture of turtle breast milk?
can you freeze it? does it keep well? so many questions.-0
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:37 pmActually, Twill selects mods with input from the ModSquad and myself.
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:48 pmwcaclimbing wrote:the_fatty wrote:i think we should make an official poll (that lack should run) and pick the top 50 candidates to be mods, then narrow it down to a number like 15 or 10. sry lack, but its better if the members of CC chose the mods and not u by urself
no way.
QFE
Tried this once before on another site - it's a disaster waiting to happen
And yes, the forum stuff you can blame me for, the rest you can blame Lack
CC tries to run with as much input from the community as possible. We implement a lot of features that are requested as fast as possible (Lack is only one man
), We give the forum a pretty free reign to go where it wants, we post maps which users make - the team here exists pretty much to make the community's wishes happen.
Now, arbitrary banning is not something that is going to happen, unless you can get 2/3rds of the active CC community to vote for banning someone (that means you only need about 12,000-13,000 votes)
Get cracking
Have a good one
Twill