Page 1 of 1

Is this worth a neg?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:31 pm
by Risktaker17
A guy does a 13v10 attack for 3 cards worth 6. I begin to curse, which I feel is necessary for the occasion. Then I start laughing and making fun of him for such a dumb move. Then he gives me a negative. I didn't think cursing was worth a negative.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:35 pm
by misterman10
It's worth a negative

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:43 pm
by Risktaker17
Cursing is worth a negative?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:44 pm
by Gilligan
Trying to take someone out in the game?

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:47 pm
by Russianfire8371
everyone's different. Everyone has different lines. You apparently crossed his line so you got the negative. Its always a risk -shrug-

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:51 pm
by Jehan
the way you went on like your the king of risk was worth a negie, and then he beat you as well which was just funny.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:43 pm
by Twill
I'd say it's fair game - the "I made fun of him" part - really, c'mon, you make fun of someone and expect them not to use the tools available to them to comment on it? :)

Re: Is this worth a neg?

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:49 pm
by Rocketry
Risktaker17 wrote:A guy does a 13v10 attack for 3 cards worth 6. I begin to curse, which I feel is necessary for the occasion. Then I start laughing and making fun of him for such a dumb move. Then he gives me a negative. I didn't think cursing was worth a negative.


i wish you could leave negs for people that silly threads

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:59 pm
by BlackIrish
It's just a negative.

I have plenty.

struff

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:15 pm
by Piestar
I think it's worth a neg... if it was a face-to-face game, it would be worth a lot more, so count your blessings.

!#*!*

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:44 pm
by jangler3
F#!* Y!*!!!!!! jk. I know Sarcasm is hard to get on the internet. But I keep trying. I guess you shouldn't cuss, unless you know who your playing.

you have to be kidding

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:09 pm
by Piestar
If swearing is someones idea of sarcasm, I pity them...

Let's see what the book of quotations has to say...

“Profanity is the weapon of the witless”

sweet, anything else?

"Profanity is the attempt of a lazy and feeble mind to express itself forcefully”

The only question now is, how many people here will think it is 'humorous' to reply with profanity, and prove the point!

?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:36 pm
by jangler3
I guess some people take everything too serious. No wonder players get neg rep, for harmless taunting.

Re: ?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:21 pm
by Piestar
jangler3 wrote:I guess some people take everything too serious. No wonder players get neg rep, for harmless taunting.


Obviously if people get upset enough to leave to Negative feedback, it's not as harmless as you want to believe.

It might not cause physical damage, but it certainly reduces the amount of enjoyment other players get, and that seems harmful enough to me.

Besides, if that kind of behavior is your idea of fun, they always have Flame Wars; at least you know the people there are into it...

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:24 pm
by Navilluso
misterman10 wrote:It's worth a negative


I have to agree.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:43 pm
by soundout9
Risktaker17 wrote:Cursing is worth a negative?

To me yes...unless you are doing it in a joking manner

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:52 pm
by Catawbain
I see nothing wrong with cursing personally, I think everyone does once in a while to exert some frustration or even to spice up a sentance lol ( It's not awesome, but "******* AWESOME" LOL. Some people probably don't want to hear it, if there was some sort of voluntary censor I think it would be better ;-) but there isn't, so I guess it's more a matter of knowing who you have to hold your tongue around and if you don't know them, hold it anyways.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:01 pm
by jangler3
Hey, I'm not saying you should be cussin. I think I'm respectful of other players. But cuss me, I don't care. Just trying to get under your skin and when you let them that's when you lose. And I don't need any help losing.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:21 pm
by oVo
You killed Kenny, YOU BASTARD!
If someone can't take a joke? f*ck EM!
If you encounter someone who uses language you find objectionable in the game chat? Just put them on your ignore list for the duration of play and you won't even see it.
"The Rules" say that trash talking the opposition is ok, which I believe includes cussing. Considering the fact that many players don't receive feedback for the majority of games played, IMHO you don't like their chat vocabulary? Give 'em a neutral and write up all the details, but checking a player's negs only to discover they got it for cussing is kind of pathetic, just let it go.If they are a poor sport and cuss you out? that's a completely different thing.

There are so many lame reasons negative feedbacks are given like; he cided on me, he wouldn't let me win, he sed dum stuff in chat or used bad werds, that it's hard to even take feedbacks seriously. It all becomes a bunch of petty belly achin' crap after awhile.

If red cards were given out in the World Cup as easily as the negs are here, there would be no players on the pitch.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:25 pm
by soundout9
Navilluso wrote:
misterman10 wrote:It's worth a negative


I have to agree.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:55 am
by Iliad
It depends. On how serious the person was and how much did he go on with. If you just said:
f*ck! If you got shitty dice no I don't think that's a neg. However if you continued or made fun of the person some people might give you a neg

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:08 pm
by oVo
from the CC rules page:

[url=http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=rules]"Trash-talking" can be a fun element of the game
and we take a liberal stance on what is allowed to be said in game chat.[/url]

I would like to hear the rationale behind all these players who think foul language is worth a negative. In simpler terms, why does cussing deserve a neg?

How liberal is Conquer Club's stance? I'm in a game a while back when a total idiot, who wasn't even in the game, posts to the chat 2007-09-29 13:57:47 - rylesc: "dr tony suks cok", which might be neg worthy even though it is vulgar slang and not cussing... but rylesc wasn't in our game and couldn't receive feedback. Thinking this might qualify as harassment I submitted an e-ticket, but the response from Moz stated that what he did wasn't against the rules and was therefore ok.

shift

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:29 am
by Piestar
oVo wrote:from the CC rules page:

[url=http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=rules]"Trash-talking" can be a fun element of the game
and we take a liberal stance on what is allowed to be said in game chat.[/url]

I would like to hear the rationale behind all these players who think foul language is worth a negative. In simpler terms, why does cussing deserve a neg?

How liberal is Conquer Club's stance? I'm in a game a while back when a total idiot, who wasn't even in the game, posts to the chat 2007-09-29 13:57:47 - rylesc: "dr tony suks cok", which might be neg worthy even though it is vulgar slang and not cussing... but rylesc wasn't in our game and couldn't receive feedback. Thinking this might qualify as harassment I submitted an e-ticket, but the response from Moz stated that what he did wasn't against the rules and was therefore ok.


(1) Trash talking can be a fun element of a game. I do not personally believe profanity is a required (or more to the point 'fun') element to trash talking. As such, I don't feel the acceptance of one requires the acceptance of the other.

(2) Foul language, per se, is not worth a negative from me. A player has a bad series of dice, or misplaces his armies and says 'f*ck'. No big deal. Profanity aimed at someone however, comes only from the urge to insult and/or irritate; how someone who has done so can complain when he succeeds in his goal baffles me, but they do.

(3) How liberal is CC? Pretty darn liberal, but liberal doesn't apply only to a players actions, it applies to a persons right to respond with a negative feedback. Swearing isn't illegal, neither is complaining about it. Pretty darn liberal... Feedback has no OFFICIAL clout, its only impact is that other players may choose not to play with you. While I admit, many a jerk wad WANTS an unsuspecting audience, so they can get attention for playing with their own doodie, but personally I don't feel they have the right to demand people not warn others. Open, liberal, fair.

As to your random grafitti artist, he may be immune to your feedback, but you can ignore him (or her) and that's worth a lot.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:04 am
by oVo
Thankyou for that thoughtful and well written response Piestar. (2) "Foul language, per se, is not worth a negative from me" either, but if used in a pejorative context as an insult, might alter my opinion of a player.