Moderator: Community Team
cena-rules wrote:what happened mate??
oVo wrote:I thought this might be about the stealth chat that occurs in so many games. I've had some where players don't even bother to say hello once a game is initiated.
oVo wrote:I thought this might be about the stealth chat that occurs in so many games. I've had some where players don't even bother to say hello once a game is initiated.
oVo wrote:I thought this might be about the stealth chat that occurs in so many games. I've had some where players don't even bother to say hello once a game is initiated.
KoE_Sirius wrote:I just wish the snobbery would stop in this community.I have never refused to play anyone because of rank.If I did then I would properly still have a crown.The crown would be worthless though.
If you can't play all of conquerclub,then it tends to limit our horizons.
Still thats just me.
I can understand why you wouldnt want to play deadbeats,but thats where my understanding comes to a close.
I'm sorry if this offends some of you,but its how I feel.
DAZMCFC wrote:oVo wrote:I thought this might be about the stealth chat that occurs in so many games. I've had some where players don't even bother to say hello once a game is initiated.
i think it is just common curtesy to wish them good luck.
jiminski wrote:My mate Hatchman, feeling very much the same way as Sirius, has suggested that we could have a point amnesty in some games .. whereby you could play anyone just for fun and without exchange of points....
hwhrhett wrote:jiminski wrote:My mate Hatchman, feeling very much the same way as Sirius, has suggested that we could have a point amnesty in some games .. whereby you could play anyone just for fun and without exchange of points....
yeah, hatchman doesnt play non-doubles public games either. thats ok, but he shouldnt complain about ppl not playing public games if he does not himself.... of course i can only assume that is what you were saying since you say he agrees with sirius, who wants more high ranked folks to play public games....
jiminski wrote:hwhrhett wrote:jiminski wrote:My mate Hatchman, feeling very much the same way as Sirius, has suggested that we could have a point amnesty in some games .. whereby you could play anyone just for fun and without exchange of points....
yeah, hatchman doesnt play non-doubles public games either. thats ok, but he shouldnt complain about ppl not playing public games if he does not himself.... of course i can only assume that is what you were saying since you say he agrees with sirius, who wants more high ranked folks to play public games....
hehe you pedantic cuttlefish!
Hatch actually does feel quite a pressure to score points; in fact to the point where he no longer enjoyed the game ...
So he was saying that he would like to take the points out of it in some cases.. In order for the pressure to be taken out and then anyone could more freely play anyone else!.. which is what i think Sirius was calling for.
Taking the points out should be fine for low rankers if they don't care about the points? (surely only those of higher ranks care about points..)
Of course not, many like to play Higher ranks as there is a higher reward.... ... but you see the problem with that can be that the ranking player gets targeted.
Anyway this is not the point and i am not going to stick up for a 2 tier system.
I play quite a number of Singles public game too and i very much enjoy them.
hwhrhett wrote:jiminski wrote:
hehe you pedantic cuttlefish!
i play alot of private games, because the games are better and more enjoyable for me, however i think if you cant beat 5 noobs 8 times out of 10, then you dont deserve to have a high rank. seems the only ppl that are scared of playing public singles tgames are the ones that have gotten their rank by playing nothing bu public doubles or triples against poor noobs that dont have a chance against a decent player. seems more like manipulating the rank system than earning a rank. not that there is anything wrong with that, but its silly to me when those ppl complain.
jiminski wrote:hwhrhett wrote:jiminski wrote:
hehe you pedantic cuttlefish!
i play alot of private games, because the games are better and more enjoyable for me, however i think if you cant beat 5 noobs 8 times out of 10, then you dont deserve to have a high rank. seems the only ppl that are scared of playing public singles tgames are the ones that have gotten their rank by playing nothing bu public doubles or triples against poor noobs that dont have a chance against a decent player. seems more like manipulating the rank system than earning a rank. not that there is anything wrong with that, but its silly to me when those ppl complain.
Ok HW,
I only mentioned Hatch so as not to take credit for the idea.... I see you have a certain disdain for his stance so if i pretend that the idea was mine would it be better?![]()
I had an idea! how about we have some game where we play for not points! that way we would break the cycle of point acquisitiveness and lower ranks would get the chance to play higher ones.
At the moment, unfortunate though it is, human nature determines that when you earn something few wish to give it all away! this linked with the point handicap leads to a 2 tier gaming structure.
My idea would enable newer players to learn the nuances of the game from experienced players and also allow experienced players to familiarise themselves with good but new players and not brand them all as Deadbeats and suiciders.
heheh i think my idea is terrific! Do you like my idea HW?
KoE_Sirius wrote:hwhrhett,This thread wasn't started because no high rankers play public games at all.Even if one high ranker refuses.Its Snobbery.
Please don't get defensive,the thread is not directed at anyone in particular
KoE_Sirius wrote:pedantic cuttlefish? How can a fish show this kind of response when they only have a three second memory!
![]()
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users