Page 1 of 1

speed games

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:23 pm
by FEDEISPHAT
is it legal to skip a turn on purpose in order to ensure a better position on ur next turn?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:24 pm
by Russianfire8371
its frowned down upon

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:24 pm
by happy2seeyou
It is no different than people skipping turns in other games. Most think of it as cheap though. If you did that in games, I am sure you would be put on a few people's ignore list.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:24 pm
by wicked
If you think it'll work. Note they can still attack you though. :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:26 pm
by Lanceyboyuk
i still dont see how you gain from it lol

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:44 pm
by Rocketry
Yes - this is perfectly legit, allowed and there is nothing wrong with using it. Remember though, you get NO extra armies, just those you would have recieved anyway, you may miss getting a card, other people may get their bonuses sorted before you and some rubbish players will 'frown' upon it and leave you negs to warn other rubbish players that can't adapt their own stratagies to new situations and will therefore stop playing you. i hope this rather long answer answers your question suitably. Good day to you. Rocketry

PostPosted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:30 pm
by philh
You may get no extra armies, but you get those armies all at the same time. That's a big deal. Suppose you can attack another player on two fronts. If you deploy to one of them, he can defend it better. If you then fort those armies to where you can attack the other front, he can fort his defending armies.

By not deploying, your opponent can't know where you'll attack. So he has to defend on both fronts. That's much harder to do.

It's not a legitimate strategy, because if it was there'd be an option to do it without holding the game up. I think it could be, if such an option was added, but it's debatable whether that would be an improvement or not.