Page 1 of 2
ANNOUNCING TEAM JR !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:45 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
thats right CC players, team JR is here. To follow suit of the new trend I have paid for 3 more accounts to form my very own triples team. Since this is permitted as long as I dont play singles with these players, I should be able to rack up the points now.
JOHNNYROCKET1= my dead wife
JOHNNYROCKET2= my unborn child
JOHNNYROCKET3= my 3 legged dog
so move over
templeton peck/bosco baracas
q/sky t/danbemp
the holy roller/ jc solid rock/ keyborn/ chickpig
the mighty JR will show you how it is done. Prepare for my pwnage !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:49 amby stringybeany
well said, JR!
well said!
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:50 amby rebelman
go team
Re: ANNOUNCING TEAM JR !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:58 amby gimil
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I should be able to rack up the points now.
That i lost when freestyle got changed
Re: ANNOUNCING TEAM JR !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:02 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
gimil wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I should be able to rack up the points now.
That i lost when freestyle got changed
as far as I know, freestyle hasnt changed. I dint lose the points on freestyle. good job in checking that out.
Re: ANNOUNCING TEAM JR !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:05 amby gimil
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:gimil wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I should be able to rack up the points now.
That i lost when freestyle got changed
as far as I know, freestyle hasnt changed. I dint lose the points on freestyle. good job in checking that out.
jsut messing
lighten up
bet thats me o the ignore list now
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:19 amby juventino
But you only need 2 people? no need for JR3. But anywa. Good luck and best wishes
Edit. Sorry. I read now you want a team and not yourself on the team.. now i see why you need 3 ppl. Anyway. Good luck again =)
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:20 amby RiskTycoon
too funny
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:28 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
juventino wrote:But you only need 2 people? no need for JR3. But anywa. Good luck and best wishes
as part of my experiment ( thanks Dim ) im going to start fresh with 3 new accounts and show everyone how to accumulate the points. because I want to do something that helps the site
next experiment- non members should not be permitted to use the feedback system. it should be a paid benefit only. too many non members only want real time games and they play for quanity and not quality. so they leave BS feedback because games were not completed in a timely manner for them and we all know as long as it is worded properly, the feedback stands. They join this site and abuse the benefits while enjoying free games.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:36 amby firth4eva
maybe then we can get 4 sets of JR's top 10. and JR can wank off about his obsession with an online risk game 4 times a day
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:43 amby chessplaya
Rule # 1 in CC : NO multies for any circumstances
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:48 amby wicked
Go for it. I'll enjoy the bust.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:52 amby rebelman
they are not multis they are roommates and a girlfriend, or am I thinking of someone else lol
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:58 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
wicked wrote:Go for it. I'll enjoy the bust.
theres nothing to bust. all 3 players will be on the same team just like the mods permitt everyone else to do including the 3 teams I have documented in this thread.. they will never play singles against each other. if you decide to bust me, than you have to bust every other player that the mods turned their head on and looked the other way. that includes our currently ranked number 1 player.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:59 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
rebelman wrote:they are not multis they are roommates and a girlfriend, or am I thinking of someone else lol
yeah- and my team is my roomate and girlfriend.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:01 amby wicked
If you think that's the case, then you're mistaken. Ask the many people we've busted who've never played a game together. We look at far more than what games they've played to make a determination.
If you have an actual suspected multi, post in the cheating forum.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:11 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
wicked wrote:If you think that's the case, then you're mistaken. Ask the many people we've busted who've never played a game together. If you have an actual suspected multi, post in the cheating forum.
anyone playing with the same IP is a multi..... its that simple. Now in this thread here
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27876 you stated you can tell the difference. there is no possible way that can be determined if it is the same person or 3 different players. especially in sequential games. In freestyle games there could be a pattern discovered. but even than you dont know for sure. If your going to believe that there is 3 players using the same IP, than there needs to be a block with those players from playing together. Just like others have already stepped up and stated that they were blocked. Why these cases I have documented here were not responded upon, and yes they were in the cheating section already, is beyond my knowledge of understanding why.
rule number 1 needs to be ammended to keep up with the times. It is almost 2 years old now and is no longer current.
just curious though. How many players looked to see if I formed 3 new accounts ? lol !
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:18 amby wicked
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:anyone playing with the same IP is a multi..... its that simple. Now in this thread here
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27876 you stated you can tell the difference. there is no possible way that can be determined if it is the same person or 3 different players. especially in sequential games.
LMAO. You really think you know it all, eh? If someone knew exactly what we looked at, then yes, they'd know how to circumvent our detection. Which is precisely why we don't divulge everything we look at. I'm pretty sure I could create multi accounts and never be detected since I know the ins and outs of the system we have in place. Could someone else have figured it out? Not saying it's impossible, just unlikely. You've shown above that you haven't figured it out.
That said, I'll personally look into each case you mentioned, and discuss it with the other MH's, if you either post it in the cheating forum, or link me to the thread already there.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:34 amby JOHNNYROCKET24
the holly roller/jc rock solid/keyborn/chiefpig
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27876
SkyT/Q//Danbemp
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=27367
Templeton Peck/Bosco baracas
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25090
im actually looking forward to how you determine these players do not use the same IP and are not multis or should not be blocked from playing together even if it is a wife/husband relationship. If it is a some kind of relationship, than automatically they should be blocked. They can play plenty of games without one another.
logging in and out times is not 100% accurate
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:46 amby gimil
If your going to have a post starting like this.
thats right CC players, team JR is here. To follow suit of the new trend I have paid for 3 more accounts to form my very own triples team. Since this is permitted as long as I dont play singles with these players, I should be able to rack up the points now.
JOHNNYROCKET1= my dead wife
JOHNNYROCKET2= my unborn child
JOHNNYROCKET3= my 3 legged dog
then what chance is there that you can prove that your not intentionally multiing? how can you possibly prove that your not an intentional multi?
What your trying to prove seems fair, how your doing it is stupid. on the same IP as team memer multi's
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:48 amby kalishnikov
Announcing that your going to make multis might not have been the best way to go about it. Whether or not it's legit is a whole other story but I doubt it as dead wives and dogs can't actually play their turns...
The other cases you sited at least claimed the second person was a real person, capable of typing/taking turns (i.e., not dead or unborn).
I'm not tryin to hate or anything, just sayin...
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:54 amby wicked
the holly roller/jc rock solid/keyborn/chiefpig
....That link wasn't correct, but I looked closely at a number of their games and they appear to be different people. Although, I did bust chiefpig with morganzer.
SkyT/Q//Danbemp
.... the explanation they gave in that thread checks out. It does appear they take turns for each other occassionally, but that's not illegal. They also have multiple games where it's clear there's more than one person playing at the time. If they were playing singles games, I'd block them, but they're not.
Templeton Peck/Bosco baracas
.... are no longer playing, haven't logged in about a month. Sully initially investigated them, and he's better at this than I am, so I trust his judgment.
So amazingly enough, I stand by the decisions already made by our Multi-Hunters, and based on all the evidence, don't see a reason to bring this up for further discussion among them.
In the future, please use the proper procedures we have in place.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:04 pmby sully800
When it comes down to it, having one person play three accounts is a less effective team than 3 people playing on one team at the same time. A coordinated team (whether its by IM or roommates) can play much quicker and more effectively in freestyle games, so you should actually be wishing you were three separate people.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:09 pmby JOHNNYROCKET24
wicked wrote:the holly roller/jc rock solid/keyborn/chiefpig
....That link wasn't correct, but I looked closely at a number of their games and they appear to be different people. Although, I did bust chiefpig with morganzer.
SkyT/Q//Danbemp
.... the explanation they gave in that thread checks out. It does appear they take turns for each other occassionally, but that's not illegal. They also have multiple games where it's clear there's more than one person playing at the time. If they were playing singles games, I'd block them, but they're not.
Templeton Peck/Bosco baracas
.... are no longer playing, haven't logged in about a month. Sully initially investigated them, and he's better at this than I am, so I trust his judgment.
So amazingly enough, I stand by the decisions already made by our Multi-Hunters, and based on all the evidence, don't see a reason to bring this up for further discussion among them.
In the future, please use the proper procedures we have in place.
you answered nothing
you said 2 you dint check, and 1 I was partial right. but hey, whatever. I blocked them all.
Posted:
Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:23 pmby wicked
That's b/c it's already been answered correctly in the other threads by Sully and King.