Conquer Club

On the 1st page of the scoreboard (top 250) there are 31 players that have a win rate BELOW 35%...
That means they LOSE about 2 out of every 3 games...
These people are LOSERS... and they know defeat intimately
They are experienced at LOSING, more than any other players with high scores...

And if that wasn't enough, 8 of these 31 have win rates BELOW 30%...
Truley they are the WORST of the WORST...

And 5 of the 31 have played less than 200 games... 10 are under 300 games
_____________________________________________________

CC's BIGGEST LOSERS
_____________________________________________________

Colonels
8 maniacmath17 3216 978 318 (33%)

Majors
22 ZawBanjito 2770 453 147 (32%)
29 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) <----- Rookie
39 Robinette 2606 321 110 (34%)
46 RL_Orange 2539 1717 480 (28%)

Captains
67 cyberdaniel 2416 696 192 (28%)
69 Oelek 2405 217 69 (32%)
70 MikeZoo 2403 690 223 (32%)
72 wacicha 2402 2922 995 (34%)
85 Freebyrd1977 2354 465 123 (26%)
92 Lector 2331 114 38 (33%) <----- Rookie
110 igotaished 2277 868 285 (33%)
111 bensonchan 2274 146 46 (32%) <----- Rookie
112 KLOBBER 2273 402 122 (30%)
116 Begbie 2267 500 160 (32%)
125 7Deep7Green7 2249 258 88 (34%)
129 rabbiton 2236 310 94 (30%)
145 NUKE 2194 529 134 (25%) <----- lowest % of all
147 fireearth 2192 154 49 (32%) <----- Rookie
150 hotspur 2185 1394 385 (28%)
161 kwolff 2163 560 191 (34%)
172 Scott-Land 2153 869 259 (30%)
198 steve monkey 2112 1131 320 (28%)
205 jarkari 2104 252 82 (33%)
221 uclap 2086 164 48 (29%) <----- Rookie
224 yair01 2081 255 82 (32%)
225 BiteMe 2080 334 99 (30%)
228 AndrewO 2078 808 252 (31%)
229 Villains 2078 282 84 (30%)
231 Helmet 2077 543 185 (34%)
234 Godd 2071 392 131 (33%)

if only i were as good as some of the rookies above

Yahoo, my percentage is about 50%.

I thought it was a list of actual losers

*sigh* I thought I would actually get to go on one of these lists

Sigh, now I have the stigma of being a LOSER, your facts of course are not as accurate as you would like them to be.

Alot of those players play terminator.... What this means is they can take out 4 or 5 players get all their points, then lose to the last player. That means they lost the game but won most of the points. Which is the stratigy most look for in a terminator game. I would rather win the points than the game. So if i am a loser by your terms then I am A LOSER.

I do not think of each game as a war but a battle, the battle for points the war will never end but there will be multitudes of battles

Its actually amazing how many players take these percentages seriously,those garbage 1 v1s have a lot to answer for

well done robinette, very creative as usual


may i point out that these are cc's biggest losers that are winners

I wish the real scoreboard looked like this. On the real scoreboard you have to actually scroll down a little to see my name

Born to lose, baby. I had that tattooed onto my forehead, next to the eagle with the enormous penis. The AMERICAN EAGLE.

Zaw - I miss our games

points 1478
Games: 572 Completed, 200 (35%) Won


200 won 199 singles won, 1 doubles.

what happened DAZ..You had over 2000 points!!!!! Just like Man City always sliding

I don't see the issue ... some people play a lot of six player ffa's ... they lose more often, but they win they get a larger amount of points.

I mean if you have a win rate of 30% and your games are mostly six player ffa's, I would consider that quite good.

Nous-irons wrote:I don't see the issue ... some people play a lot of six player ffa's ... they lose more often, but they win they get a larger amount of points.

I mean if you have a win rate of 30% and your games are mostly six player ffa's, I would consider that quite good.

I could be wrong, but isn't that what Robinette is really saying?

Also, when will the next update of this list be? I've been on the front page for the last two days, and this is one list I might actually be able to make, and I really, really want to be on a list, but I'm not sure I can hold my position for much longer...

[sigh] ' im a loser baby, so why dont ya kill me? '

I dont know, ive lost more games than combinations of up to 6 of these players combined

AAFitz wrote:I dont know, ive lost more games than combinations of up to 6 of these players combined

lol - I'd make a comment fitz but then you might rightly point out that you just kicked my butt in a doubles series

wacicha wrote:Zaw - I miss our games

I'll keep my eye out for any you got open, man. I always join them when I spot them!

sometimes we have to point out other peoples short comings - to make ourselves feel better

hulmey wrote:what happened DAZ..You had over 2000 points!!!!! Just like Man City always sliding

i might start making a climb. we will see, the same with City.

Scott-Land wrote:[sigh] ' im a loser baby, so why dont ya kill me? '

Top tune. Loser by Beck.

.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KynpC1e9I9E

I'm a loser
I'm a loser
And I'm not what I appear to be

Of all the love I have won or have lost
there is one love I should never have crossed
She was a girl in a million, my friend
I should have known she would win in the end

I'm a loser
And I lost someone who's near to me
I'm a loser
And I'm not what I appear to be

Although I laugh and I act like a clown
Beneath this mask I am wearing a frown
My tears are falling like rain from the sky
Is it for her or myself that I cry

I'm a loser
And I lost someone who's near to me
I'm a loser
And I'm not what I appear to be

What have I done to deserve such a fate
I realize I have left it too late
And so it's true, pride comes before a fall
I'm telling you so that you won't lose all

I'm a loser
And I lost someone who's near to me
I'm a loser
And I'm not what I appear to be

Hmmmmmm, winpercentage for average players on single 4 players games 25%, 5 player games 20%, 6 player games 16,6%?

And if i am correct i am one of the players on cc playing most 6 and 5 players games. And just a winpercentage of 28%?

Maybe you should get a skill rate based up winpercentage divided to winpercentage for average players. last part corrected for kind of games played (doubles, tripples, singles (number of players).

Got some time to figure this one out?

RL, you might also want to add an adjustment for the quality of opponent you're facing - say you get a certain amount of points inversely related to the points difference between you and your opponent

gibbom wrote:RL, you might also want to add an adjustment for the quality of opponent you're facing - say you get a certain amount of points inversely related to the points difference between you and your opponent

Good one. I bet Robinette can put that in the formula too. She is really great in these kind of issues

Robinette? Do you gather the gamestatics from the website yourself or do you have access to the game database of conquerclub?