Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:37 pm**

It's just too much bother to keep that other Singles list updated... So here's another way to do it...

*Circus Announcer approches the microphone*
LADIEEEEES AND GENTELMEN... May I have your attention please...
Introducing a NEW TOP SINGLES LIST.... WITHOUT handicaps....,
thats right folks, NO handicaps and only 3 requirements!!!!

And NOW.... THE FIRST requirement is..........
*opens envelope while drums are rolling*

You must have a score OVER 2000...
*the crowds cheer in unison*

The SECOND requirement is........
*tears open 2nd envelope, anticipation is felt from the crowd*

You must have a win rate BEEEEE-LOOOOW 40%...
*a silence comes over the masses... many ask, what does it mean? why is that good? the MC continues...*

AND FINALLY... there can be no more than 12 in a Dozen!!!!!
*mixed reactions from the crowd... some cheering, some booing... the MC returns to the microphone*

oh all rightie then, next time we'll make it a 'Bakers' Dozen...

And so.... without further adieu.....
The TOP 12 Players under 40%

#1... 9 maniacmath17 3124 917 301 (33%)
#2... 12 comic boy 3058 802 306 (38%)
#3...27 steve monkey 2708 1066 314 (29%)
#4...28 Robinette 2691 316 110 (35%)
#5...32 ZawBanjito 2649 440 142 (32%)
#6...44 cyberdaniel 2545 681 191 (28%)
#7...46 artur1 2534 241 95 (39%)
#8...47 Point Guard 2510 181 52 (29%)
#9...51 NUKE 2486 509 133 (26%)
#10...55 DP07 2476 242 88 (36%)
#11...58 Craig25 2449 253 95 (38%)
#12...59 MikeZoo 2447 675 213 (32%)

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:55 pm**

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:03 am**

How about another requirement must not play escalating cards? Which has very little stragey involved!!!

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:25 am**

hulmey wrote:How about another requirement must not play escalating cards? Which has very little stragey involved!!!

are you kidding me or something? escalating has TONS of strategy involved

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:33 am**

hulmey wrote:How about another requirement must not play escalating cards? Which has very little stragey involved!!!

Yep I guess all those guys got to the top by dumb luck and no strategy :roll:

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:22 am**

You should also leave out everyone who has ever won a battle royal, those can seriously inflate ones score.

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:27 am**

another list I cant be in.... I m not a singlesplayer because i have a little more then 10% teamgames...

and I dont think I have a win rate below 40 % in any type of game?

not 6 people. Not 5. Not 4. Not 3. Not 2. And ofcourse not teamgames..

I never get to be on any list.....

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:33 am**

some1 puts some work for their posts !

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:09 am**

I can make criteria like that too...

85% teamgames 10% trips 5% singles
european people from which the nickname have something to do with an animal.
that way you can be on any list yourself. =p

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:20 am**

Its all good fun guys

The good players know who each other are,they play together often enough !

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:59 am**

juventino wrote:another list I cant be in.... I m not a singlesplayer because i have a little more then 10% teamgames...

and I dont think I have a win rate below 40 % in any type of game?

not 6 people. Not 5. Not 4. Not 3. Not 2. And ofcourse not teamgames..

I never get to be on any list.....

Awwwww Juv,
Everybody likes you, so here's a way in the side door of this party...

For 6 player, std, esc, seq... you have a 35% win rate...

Suprised? need to play more of those to get that # up, eh? :wink:

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:10 am**

Robinette wrote:For 6 player, std, esc, seq... you have a 35% win rate...[/b]

hehe. i had only looked at overall 6pl and i had 45% there.. I will try and play more 6pl std, esc seq then when it looks like it is my akilles heel..

i guess you are up for a game Rob.

?

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:14 am**

your critea is compeletly flawed and as usual robinette you are always trying to prove your in the top 5 and when you see yourself slipping down the table you invent something ti get you back up there.

EGO :arrow:

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:20 am**

juventino wrote:
Robinette wrote:For 6 player, std, esc, seq... you have a 35% win rate...[/b]

hehe. i had only looked at overall 6pl and i had 45% there.. I will try and play more 6pl std, esc seq then when it looks like it is my akilles heel..

i guess you are up for a game Rob. ?

I keep inviting you to the games but you never respond :cry:

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:47 am**

comic boy wrote:
I keep inviting you to the games but you never respond

i have been having a CC free 3 months period.. but i am back now.. send me an invite and i will join =)

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:19 pm**

juventino wrote:
comic boy wrote:
I keep inviting you to the games but you never respond

i have been having a CC free 3 months period.. but i am back now.. send me an invite and i will join =)

Yep I will let you know when I set up the next batch,maybe you can persuade Robinette as well

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:48 pm**

Yosevuk is on top of the only list that matters? It's the offical CC list that counts.

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:08 pm**

comic boy wrote:
juventino wrote:
Robinette wrote:For 6 player, std, esc, seq... you have a 35% win rate...[/b]

hehe. i had only looked at overall 6pl and i had 45% there.. I will try and play more 6pl std, esc seq then when it looks like it is my akilles heel..

i guess you are up for a game Rob. ?

I keep inviting you to the games but you never respond

hee hee... just like juv, i have been away alot and have been playing it very soft... But I'll get some games going soon for this dirty dozen...

Posted: **Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:48 am**

UPDATED....

1. maniacmath17 3124 (33%)
2. comic boy 3095 (38%)
3. Robinette 2691 (35%)
4. ZawBanjito 2623 (32%)
5. steve monkey 2619 (29%)
6. Point Guard 2598 53 (29%)
7. cyberdaniel 2545 (28%)
8. NUKE 2486 (26%)
9. Craig25 2482 (38%)
10. artur1 2458 (39%)
11. kumften 2446 (39%)
12. MikeZoo 2421 (32%)

Posted: **Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:05 pm**

why have put the threshold at 40% and not 50%????????

Posted: **Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:39 pm**

hulmey wrote:why have put the threshold at 40% and not 50%????????

The list is clearly geared towards those who play a majority of singles rather than team games,playing 5/6 player games it would be next to impossible to maintain 50%.

Posted: **Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:45 pm**

And now comic boy takes the lead... but by just 6 points

12 comic boy 3043 (38%)
13 maniacmath17 3037 (33%)
27 Robinette 2691 (35%)
30 Point Guard 2669 (29%)
35 ZawBanjito 2623 (32%)

41 steve monkey 2587 (29%)
47 cyberdaniel 2545 (28%)
48 Matt2006 2534 (35%)
51 Craig25 2520 (39%)
60 artur1 2458 (39%)

64 kumften 2446 (39%)
70 DP07 2411 (36%)

Posted: **Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:59 am**

yeah, looks like ill be on a bit of a downward slide for a while. had some games lined up for wins till unbelievably bad dice. 44 v 16? come on!

Posted: **Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:38 am**

suck it up cupcake

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:55 pm**

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

9 maniacmath17 3139 945 (33%)
12 comic boy 3046 829 (38%)
29 Point Guard 2726 186 (30%) only 13 games and 274 points from 3000 in under 200 games
31 Robinette 2691 316 (35%)
37 ZawBanjito 2623 441 (32%)

42 steve monkey 2604 1092 (29%)
47 DP07 2524 251 (37%)
50 Matt2006 2513 874 (35%)
51 Craig25 2507 264 (39%)
53 cyberdaniel 2491 684 (28%)

66 kumften 2446 235 (39%)
72 hermanitor 2409 328 (37%)