Conquer Club

Is it considered rude to attack in the first round, esp. people who've yet to have a turn themselves?

I can't honestly see it that way; I mean, who goes first is an unavoidable advantage. Someone's got to, and if you don't attack, you can fortify instead, and anyone after you on Round #1 is still at an uneven keel...

But, I thought I'd ask. Perhaps a bit late...

this is just a dumb statement i think, in every game there is someone always goes first, its life

Its not unfair to attack if you go first

misterman10 wrote:Its not unfair to attack if you go first

The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

There are many situations in no cards where the elite players will deploy and not attack, but this is more about next turn strategy then your suggestion.

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

i dispute that!

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

Waves from the middle ground

This was childish and a bit silly, I know... but I just couldn't resist. <silly grin>

No it's not rude. It's usually best to not attack first though if you have first turn, people aren't very likely to roll 6v6 against you and may even fort away by the time your next turn comes. I wish I'd listen to my own advice, losing a couple of games because I screwed up my first turn by attacking and not doing well.

No, it's not rude. This is war so how could it be rude to attack?

Clive wrote:

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

i dispute that!

Ok, go ahead, dispute it.

3seven1 wrote:No, it's not rude. This is war so how could it be rude to attack?

Clive wrote:

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

i dispute that!

Ok, go ahead, dispute it.

I meant that there is middle ground not that it's rude

Clive wrote:

3seven1 wrote:No, it's not rude. This is war so how could it be rude to attack?

Clive wrote:

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

i dispute that!

Ok, go ahead, dispute it.

I meant that there is middle ground not that it's rude

The guy asked if it was rude so I was saying it's not rude. But your sentence seemed incomplete.

3seven1 wrote:

Clive wrote:

3seven1 wrote:No, it's not rude. This is war so how could it be rude to attack?

Clive wrote:

Night Strike wrote:The dice just seem to be really good or really bad when you're first. There seems to be no middle ground.

i dispute that!

Ok, go ahead, dispute it.

I meant that there is middle ground not that it's rude

The guy asked if it was rude so I was saying it's not rude. But your sentence seemed incomplete.

I wasnt quoting the OP - but yeh i don't say it's rude either, if thats what you're asking

Mardiggan wrote:Is it considered rude to attack in the first round, esp. people who've yet to have a turn themselves?

I can't honestly see it that way; I mean, who goes first is an unavoidable advantage. Someone's got to, and if you don't attack, you can fortify instead, and anyone after you on Round #1 is still at an uneven keel...

But, I thought I'd ask. Perhaps a bit late...

no, if you go first and you attack someone who has not yet had a turn that is absolutely fine. ignore anyone that complaines

Rocketry