Moderator: Community Team
ParadiceCity9 wrote:no you dicks...i'm saying i would have played had i known he was going to get someone to play f*ck you guys.
Cronus wrote:sounds fine to me. Never bank on the fact that you believe they are leaving. Risk is a strategy game based on war. If a real life general faked a retreat to catch an enemy off guard, would the enemy cry foul? No because they would be dead. All is fair in love and war...especially war.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Are you flirting with me? Your angry posts are just the equivalent of school-yard pigtail-pulling.
wicked wrote:We like to give the mental patients a chance to get back on their meds.
BeastofBurson wrote:Cronus wrote:sounds fine to me. Never bank on the fact that you believe they are leaving. Risk is a strategy game based on war. If a real life general faked a retreat to catch an enemy off guard, would the enemy cry foul? No because they would be dead. All is fair in love and war...especially war.
is that a pancake on that rabbits head?...
BeastofBurson wrote:Cronus wrote:sounds fine to me. Never bank on the fact that you believe they are leaving. Risk is a strategy game based on war. If a real life general faked a retreat to catch an enemy off guard, would the enemy cry foul? No because they would be dead. All is fair in love and war...especially war.
is that a pancake on that rabbits head?...
Cronus wrote:sounds fine to me. Never bank on the fact that you believe they are leaving. Risk is a strategy game based on war. If a real life general faked a retreat to catch an enemy off guard, would the enemy cry foul? No because they would be dead. All is fair in love and war...especially war.
yorkiepeter wrote:Cronus wrote:sounds fine to me. Never bank on the fact that you believe they are leaving. Risk is a strategy game based on war. If a real life general faked a retreat to catch an enemy off guard, would the enemy cry foul? No because they would be dead. All is fair in love and war...especially war.
exactly, just the other day in doubles, 1 player was down to 2 armies in 1 country, but it was his partner to play before me, i was sitting with a blue set poised to take out the weak player, problem was his partner was collecting 7 armies and had the opportunity to fort another 5. So i posted in open chat 'no, 2 green, 1 blue' his partner thinking i'd fucked up by not clicking team chat then only forted 4 to his partner. I cashed my set and eliminated him, then we won a game that we were getting well beat in.
good strategy i say.
Keebs2674 wrote:I think it's poor sportsmanship to tell someone that you're not going to play anymore and then continue playing or have someone play for you. It's dishonest. It's quite another thing to try to fool people with your comments such as yorkie did. That was quite brilliant.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:What I found even funnier is that the whiner had a "MISSED TURN" in there even while the sub was playing for the other guy.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:LSU Tiger Josh wrote:What I found even funnier is that the whiner had a "MISSED TURN" in there even while the sub was playing for the other guy.
as for you...ive got a fucking life
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:LSU Tiger Josh wrote:What I found even funnier is that the whiner had a "MISSED TURN" in there even while the sub was playing for the other guy.
as for you...ive got a fucking life
Good for you, but when you miss a turn that eliminates all rights you have for biching over the matter as far as I'm concerned. Besides there is no "i quit" button in there so until lack reinstates one(he won't) you'll just have to actually find a way to actually eliminate someone instead of sending off for the "WAAAAHMBULANCE". Everyone for future reference if I say I have to leave and someone else wins, I reserve the right to come back and finish my game. Now I won't have to hear a crybaby whine if I ever do say I have to go and somehow find a way to get a sub or else to get online myself to play.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users