Page 1 of 1

Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:04 am
by iAmCaffeine
So, I have two regions that can attack an n2 for a card. One region has 198 troops, the other 299. What are the actual, precise, statistical odds for both of these assaults? Serious question. Thx in advance.

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:07 am
by mrswdk
(198/2)*((3*2)*6) = 3564

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:06 am
by ConfederateSS
------Either way...YELL ONE LAST CHARGE!...after the attack... The neutral will file a lame C and A report...Like the cry baby the neutral is...Because ,the neutral will be paranoid in thinking the world is out to get'em...When in reality ,it wasn't at all...Just a last charge...Until the neutral makes it so ,over a post of a make believe prize... :lol: :lol: :lol: ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)... :lol: :lol: :lol: ...Lucky E2 knows the realio...dealio... :D

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:16 pm
by IcePack

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:22 pm
by iAmCaffeine
I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:33 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?


It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:40 pm
by iAmCaffeine
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?


It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:51 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?


It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.


I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:55 pm
by iAmCaffeine
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?


It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.


I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

Are you trolling me?

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 8:59 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:I don't play games in my emails, what kind of person do you think I am?


It calculates the odds to your question. No email games needed.

Please link a website with a less misleading URL.


I led you to the answer, whether you want the answer to your serious question or not is up to you. Not going to hunt links all day.

Are you trolling me?


No? You asked a question and I provided an way to get your answer. You complaining about the link shows me you either aren't that serious about finding it out, or idk?
Like they say, you can lead a horse to water but can't make them drink.

It's a common site people use to get risk battle odds. If you want a different link then Google is your friend

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 9:03 pm
by Dukasaur
In B4 Sym "See this is why we need a whole new forum to debate stats 24/7"

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:57 am
by iAmCaffeine
Dukasaur wrote:In B4 Sym "See this is why we need a whole new forum to debate stats 24/7"

Please stay on topic in my serious thread.

IcePack wrote:No? You asked a question and I provided an way to get your answer. You complaining about the link shows me you either aren't that serious about finding it out, or idk?
Like they say, you can lead a horse to water but can't make them drink.

It's a common site people use to get risk battle odds. If you want a different link then Google is your friend

People like who? Are they reputable? I asked for an answer, not a method to find my answer, so you weren't very helpful.

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:18 am
by Razorvich
How about this one then.... Google is also my friend

http://riskodds.com/index.php

Image

Image

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:51 am
by Extreme Ways
Why would you want to attack a neutral 2 for a card? Which kind of spoils?

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:25 am
by riskllama
wouldn't it depend on which of his old multis he was going to be using?

Re: Statistical Question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:32 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Razorvich wrote:How about this one then.... Google is also my friend

http://riskodds.com/index.php

Do you have those images in a user-friendly font? I couldn't quote them.

Extreme Ways wrote:Why would you want to attack a neutral 2 for a card? Which kind of spoils?

It's the only region I can attack and it's a killer neutral. Flat rate, in what seems to be a long stacking game.

riskllama wrote:wouldn't it depend on which of his old multis he was going to be using?

Please don't troll my serious thread.