Conquer Club

There are a fair few cliques on CC (no surprises when you have people in usergroups, specific forum sections, clans and generally different scenes- it's like making friends in some ways), but here's the thing-

Is it a good idea for any Symmetry in these? Or would that cause annoyance?

will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

I always offer cake, friend.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.

iAmCaffeine wrote:

riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

I always offer cake, friend.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.

In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.

I voted pro-symmetry. I like voting for the underdog.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

However, perfect symmetry is not attractive.

Own goal?

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

However, perfect symmetry is not attractive.

Own goal?

Good thing I'm not perfect

When is this getting moved to general discussion?

Symmetry wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

I always offer cake, friend.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.

In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.

No, 6-2 against you. I guess riskllama only counts as .5 so it's 5.5 vs 2.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:When is this getting moved to general discussion?

It is?

Damn- thought I was on the winning side. I should really vote at some point. It'd make it a bit more of a discussion.

Have you managed to get any of the anti voters to post yet?

Symmetry wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

I always offer cake, friend.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.

In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.

You make a good point!

BrutalBob wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?

I always offer cake, friend.

Symmetry wrote:

When considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-body-symmetry.html

BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.

In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.

You make a good point!

This ain't my first rodeo.

Symmetry is a good thing. For example, if you have a notorious asshole on one side, you should have an equivalent on the other. When a notorious asshole leaves, a void is created, and others step up to fill it.

I prefer my assholes unsweetened.

elbitjusticiero wrote:Symmetry is a good thing. For example, if you have a notorious asshole on one side, you should have an equivalent on the other. When a notorious asshole leaves, a void is created, and others step up to fill it.

I prefer my assholes unsweetened.

I have literally no idea what you're talking about, but I support your right to say it, maybe.

Boom!

ANOTHER POINT TEAM SYM!

I voted for you, actually.

elbitjusticiero wrote:I voted for you, actually.

I don't think I can double down on the voting, but caff's team does seem to have stalled.

I don't even know who's voting lol.

- I voted pro Symm

- I would probably vote pro all you guys, because personalities interest me, good or bad, Everyone was young and innocent at one time, before developing their individual persona. Sometimes bad attitude and the urge to rebel and fight everything, comes from how one was raised, and the fight in some comes from the only way they knew/know how to survive.

- Good luck and piece of mind for Us all! ")

-\M∆GS/-♎

what about the trolling instinct, mags? genetics or environment?

riskllama wrote:what about the trolling instinct, mags? genetics or environment?

- Everyone outspoken is a troll, If your able to surf around looking to respond to subjects that interest you, then your guilty of being a troll.

- I would say it's genetics, there are people who aren't afraid to post, and people who are shy and like to read but not post, then those who could give a rat's azz about anything but the wars in front of them. I'm an outspoken troll ")

-\M∆GS/-♎

MagnusGreeol wrote:

riskllama wrote:what about the trolling instinct, mags? genetics or environment?

- Everyone outspoken is a troll, If your able to surf around looking to respond to subjects that interest you, then your guilty of being a troll.

- I would say it's genetics, there are people who aren't afraid to post, and people who are shy and like to read but not post, then those who could give a rat's azz about anything but the wars in front of them. I'm an outspoken troll ")

-\M∆GS/-♎

Being outspoken is not the same thing as trolling, nor is liking to engage in debates.

Oxford dictionaries wrote:To troll= Make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.

^^^.

- Yah, same thing like this type of trolling
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... ie7F7lrB0A

- I think there is more than one type of troll, It's called Stroll, I'm a Stroll cuz I like strolling around and commenting here and there, and not necessarily in a bad way,,,,,I'm a Stroll!!

-\MGM/-♎ "The Stroll")