Page 1 of 1
Ranking system

Posted:
Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:02 am
by codeblue1018
Who would like to see the old ranking system re-instated besides me?
Re: Ranking system

Posted:
Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:04 am
by alex_white101
codeblue1018 wrote:Who would like to see the old ranking system re-instated besides me?
not me

Posted:
Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:49 am
by firth4eva
no poll
not me

Posted:
Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:01 am
by rsuttles58
Nah, I like it the way it is.

Posted:
Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:18 pm
by kalishnikov
Yea you should have made it a poll.
Why do you want the old system back?
And not me, either. I like this one.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:51 am
by Darnor
I wouldn't mind seeing it back. I was going to take a few weeks break after hitting captain. I hit captain then the ranks changed the next morning. Now i've got several more weeks if not months to go. Maybe ill stop at leuitenant.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:53 am
by alex_white101
i like it, the way it was i had reached the highest rank i was ever going to attain and there was nothing left for me to aim for, now however there is lots for me to aim for


Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:37 am
by MeDeFe
There is no "old" ranking system because it's still exactly the same, they just put in a few new dividers and flashy symbols.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:14 am
by glide
lol.........I like the new system.....its way more accurate and realistic......about 6 weeks ago I hit a personal high of 1703, and was very happy to be a major........of course I crashed all the way back down to 1100 soon after....

.......but as of yesterday, I hit another personal high of 1757 or so, and am now a Sgt first class.........wooooohooooooo.........but.....when and if I ever hit major again...it will mean something this time!


Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:19 am
by ape88
This ranking system is good. Despite what my sig says, it should stay

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:21 am
by richnpoor
Im adjusted at this point it no longer matters although at first i was opposed to the new rank structure
rich


Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:47 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
it is fine the way it is and thats coming from a player that loses 60 points every loss and gains 7 points per win.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:58 pm
by KennyC
Its just like a new pair of underwear. At first its constricting, then it becomes a part of you.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:29 pm
by sully800
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:it is fine the way it is and thats coming from a player that loses 60 points every loss and gains 7 points per win.
Every person you play has 900 points?
Yeah we get it, its tough at the top....but quit exaggerating


Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:40 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
sully800 wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:it is fine the way it is and thats coming from a player that loses 60 points every loss and gains 7 points per win.
Every person you play has 900 points?
Yeah we get it, its tough at the top....but quit exaggerating

I got triple games up if you wanna join. you will always find these games in public waiting for players to join. Remember, I can only have 50 at a time though !! lol


Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:41 pm
by reverend_kyle
lol, I dont know it as well as the old one but its fine.

Posted:
Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:51 pm
by zarvinny
how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood¿

Posted:
Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:12 am
by MeDeFe
would a woodchuck chuck, at least that's how I know it.

Posted:
Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:01 pm
by ParadiceCity9
rsuttles58 wrote:Nah, I like it the way it is.
me too