Conquer Club

I think it was 28-1, but stats only show the last 25 battles. What is the most extreme you have ever noticed in a game?

my favorite.

another dice thread.

iAmCaffeine wrote:

well played.

#1_stunna wrote:

iAmCaffeine wrote:

well played.

Thanks mate.

Kaskavel wrote:

I think it was 28-1, but stats only show the last 25 battles. What is the most extreme you have ever noticed in a game?

well... at least he's not fucking crying about the dice... like basically every other thread associated with dice...

#1_stunna wrote:my favorite.

another dice thread.

i received an email alert that there was another dice thread on CC and dropped everything i was doing to come see the latest!!!! my day is now complete!!! the black jesus is pleased...-el Jesus negro

Wow, seems like I am missing a lot from the site...
I am an ex conqueror and I obviously did not create a "dice thread". I just asked which is the most extreme series of wins/losses you guys have noticed in your experience.

Lol, people are just posting without even reading now that they see "dice" in a title..
You re talking about battle outcome % in our stats kaskavel? I don t look at it very frequently, so no idea..

And caf, i don t get the reference. That was the avatar of someone from AOD, but don t know who the guy on the picture is.

It's Ludacris and it was a special something for stunna, don't worry.

Battle outcomes is more important than dice stats. I don't care what number I roll as long as it is higher than my opponent. Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.

Then my next attack 5 seconds later On the same game I got completely dice screwed...something like 16 not able to kill a 6. I just about had a complete meltdown...surprised I did not break something.

Kind of like the dice threads....u barely notice when u get amazing dice but people come here and cry like a baby when dice do not go their way.

ChrisPond wrote:Battle outcomes is more important than dice stats. I don't care what number I roll as long as it is higher than my opponent. Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.

Then my next attack 5 seconds later On the same game I got completely dice screwed...something like 16 not able to kill a 6. I just about had a complete meltdown...surprised I did not break something.

Kind of like the dice threads....u barely notice when u get amazing dice but people come here and cry like a baby when dice do not go their way.

So you laugh when losing a 26v2 (a 13to1), and you go ballistic on a 3to2.
Not sure I want to know what you do if you ever win on a 3to2 battle.

I lost a 18v1 in CC.
Live board game I lost a 32v1.
But the most frustrating is when I lost a 6v1 every turn, same terit (bonus terit) for six turns in a row...no card no terit; was winning up to that point.

Gweeedo wrote:

ChrisPond wrote:Battle outcomes is more important than dice stats. I don't care what number I roll as long as it is higher than my opponent. Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.

Then my next attack 5 seconds later On the same game I got completely dice screwed...something like 16 not able to kill a 6. I just about had a complete meltdown...surprised I did not break something.

Kind of like the dice threads....u barely notice when u get amazing dice but people come here and cry like a baby when dice do not go their way.

So you laugh when losing a 26v2 (a 13to1), and you go ballistic on a 3to2.
Not sure I want to know what you do if you ever win on a 3to2 battle.

I lost a 18v1 in CC.
Live board game I lost a 32v1.
But the most frustrating is when I lost a 6v1 every turn, same terit (bonus terit) for six turns in a row...no card no terit; was winning up to that point.

No. He said he WON 26 v 2 and then LOST 16 v 6.
@Kaskaval...what happened to your ranking? You were the master of Hive.

No he said he WENT 26-2...I missed that too.
Not sure what he is saying???

Gweeedo wrote:No he said he WENT 26-2...I missed that too.
Not sure what he is saying???

I had extremely good luck and then bad luck on the same turn on 2 different attacks. I barely noticed my good luck and about lost control of my actions on my bad luck.

My point is people notice their bad luck and bitch about it. They rarely acknowledge their good luck. It pretty much all evens out.

Gweeedo wrote:

ChrisPond wrote:Battle outcomes is more important than dice stats. I don't care what number I roll as long as it is higher than my opponent. Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.

Then my next attack 5 seconds later On the same game I got completely dice screwed...something like 16 not able to kill a 6. I just about had a complete meltdown...surprised I did not break something.

Kind of like the dice threads....u barely notice when u get amazing dice but people come here and cry like a baby when dice do not go their way.

So you laugh when losing a 26v2 (a 13to1), and you go ballistic on a 3to2.
Not sure I want to know what you do if you ever win on a 3to2 battle.

I lost a 18v1 in CC.
Live board game I lost a 32v1.
But the most frustrating is when I lost a 6v1 every turn, same terit (bonus terit) for six turns in a row...no card no terit; was winning up to that point.

You probably had a better shot at winning the lottery than losing a 32v1.

According to RiskOdds, there is a 0% chance of that happening. 184174 of 184174 trials won a 32v1.

loutil wrote:

Gweeedo wrote:

ChrisPond wrote:Battle outcomes is more important than dice stats. I don't care what number I roll as long as it is higher than my opponent. Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.

Then my next attack 5 seconds later On the same game I got completely dice screwed...something like 16 not able to kill a 6. I just about had a complete meltdown...surprised I did not break something.

Kind of like the dice threads....u barely notice when u get amazing dice but people come here and cry like a baby when dice do not go their way.

So you laugh when losing a 26v2 (a 13to1), and you go ballistic on a 3to2.
Not sure I want to know what you do if you ever win on a 3to2 battle.

I lost a 18v1 in CC.
Live board game I lost a 32v1.
But the most frustrating is when I lost a 6v1 every turn, same terit (bonus terit) for six turns in a row...no card no terit; was winning up to that point.

No. He said he WON 26 v 2 and then LOST 16 v 6.
@Kaskaval...what happened to your ranking? You were the master of Hive.

I still am
I dropped too low with 1 vs 1 random games

Sorry, I still don't get it.

I understand what you are saying, but I do not understand your reference?
When you say you went 26-2; Does that mean you won 26v2?
If so, I would agree that is extremely lucky...not!
Or did you mean to say 2v26? Now that I do not believe!

You are right, people do not acknowledge their good luck...I believe your unlucky opponent will cover that end.

damn...he lost 2 and killed 26...how is that hard to understand?

he had a ridiculous great fdice and was happy for a second...next attack he lost 16 and killed 6, just somebad dice and he was 5 minutes angry

got it?

Armandolas wrote:damn...he lost 2 and killed 26...how is that hard to understand?

he had a ridiculous great fdice and was happy for a second...next attack he lost 16 and killed 6, just somebad dice and he was 5 minutes angry

got it?

You're wrong as well.. Chris is saying he made a row of attacks and only lost two taking a total of 26, but then he failed to take a 6 with 16 troops.

Armandolas wrote:damn...he lost 2 and killed 26...how is that hard to understand?

he had a ridiculous great fdice and was happy for a second...next attack he lost 16 and killed 6, just somebad dice and he was 5 minutes angry

got it?

Quote:Couple of weeks ago I went 26-2 (or something close to that) on an auto assault. I simply laughed about it for a second.


Your right, what was I thinking...it is as plain as day; nothing hard to understand here.

(on an auto assault)...Edit: on multiple Assaults: much better.

How about that, Gweeedo is correcting improper grammar (that's a first).

Carry on

Gweeedo wrote:No he said he WENT 26-2...I missed that too.
Not sure what he is saying???

26-2, as in he won 26 rolls and lost 2.

Gabriel13 wrote:

Gweeedo wrote:No he said he WENT 26-2...I missed that too.
Not sure what he is saying???

26-2, as in he won 26 rolls and lost 2.

Attacking 2 with 26 is generally recognized as 26v2.

Gabriel13 wrote:

Gweeedo wrote:No he said he WENT 26-2...I missed that too.
Not sure what he is saying???

26-2, as in he won 26 rolls and lost 2.

Enough Said. I understand now.
He won a single battle using auto assault; defeating 24 units while only losing 2...Very impressive!

I'm betting the game was Trench

iAmCaffeine wrote:You're wrong as well.. Chris is saying he made a row of attacks and only lost two taking a total of 26, but then he failed to take a 6 with 16 troops.

wrong..it was an auto-assault

Gweeedo wrote:Enough Said. I understand now.

No you dont
Its this

Gabriel13 wrote:26-2, as in he won 26 rolls and lost 2.