Page 1 of 3
The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:27 am
by 2dimes
I don't mind as long as he only uses that account to play games. As the administrator he could do all sorts of atrocities. Using the letter U for purple for example.
I fully agree that taking agent86's point was a bit foul.
Discussion?
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:38 am
by betiko
What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:41 am
by BGtheBrain
*****
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:42 am
by Gilligan
betiko wrote:What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
Did he? I thought someone found it and it was just kind of assumed it was him.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:06 pm
by Serbia
Gilligan wrote:betiko wrote:What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
Did he? I thought someone found it and it was just kind of assumed it was him.
This.
Bollocks.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:22 pm
by betiko
Gilligan wrote:betiko wrote:What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
Did he? I thought someone found it and it was just kind of assumed it was him.
Yeah, i think it was more that, but when it was found i think he confirmed.
Why change account? Just in case there might ve been some bad blood with certain users and have a fresh start i guess? He definitely was a site user before buying the site though, he seems to know about it pretty well.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:34 pm
by EBConquer
betiko wrote:...but when it was found i think he confirmed.
I don't remember reading this... which thread was it in?
EDIT: oops, misquoted and fixed.

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:37 pm
by 2dimes
I don't mind him making a new account every week to play games and see what the common man is up to. I guess I would get cranky losing points to those accounts though.
I'll link the closed thread where they suggested a new one here for discussion.
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=195393&view=unread#unread
Re:

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:43 pm
by EBConquer
2dimes wrote:I don't mind him making a new account every week to play games and see what the common man is up to. I guess I would get cranky losing points to those accounts though.
I'll link the closed thread where they suggested a new one here for discussion.
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=195393&view=unread#unread
Oh.... yeah, i read that, thanks. I was assuming someone knew or found out who the other account was. I guess i was just looking for some juicy intel.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:47 pm
by betiko
This is like someone owning a house warning you that if you put your feet on the table you get kicked out. If the owner does it, what are you gonna do about it? His house his rules.
I don t care. I m just curious to know who he was.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:54 pm
by TheForgivenOne
betiko wrote:This is like someone owning a house warning you that if you put your feet on the table you get kicked out. If the owner does it, what are you gonna do about it? His house his rules.
I don t care. I m just curious to know who he was.
I doubt he'll reveal. If I was in his position, I wouldn't.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:52 pm
by greenoaks
betiko wrote:What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
who do you think El jefe confirmed his previous account to be?
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:08 pm
by EBConquer
greenoaks wrote:betiko wrote:What was his former account? El jefe publically revealed his.
who do you think El jefe confirmed his previous account to be?
Damn... i got nothing. great question.

Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:23 pm
by NoSurvivors
Here's a quick question: who cares? lol. so what? if the owner doesnt want to be known then leave him alone! Geez people you guys are like freaking flies on shit with this topic!
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:54 pm
by EBConquer
NoSurvivors wrote:Here's a quick question: who cares? lol. so what? if the owner doesnt want to be known then leave him alone! Geez people you guys are like freaking flies on shit with this topic!
You have to be kidding me w/ this post. And yes, you have officially offended me as I don't post a whole lot due to trolls.
I guess now my main question is... how does one politely ask who the other username is without being fucking flies on shit?
You sir are on my foe list. Once you become an un-teenie-bopper... i'll reconsider.

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:47 pm
by 2dimes
I thought it was interesting that agent86 was angry. I think he has good reason if he takes his points seriously.
Part of why multis are bad is because you could have a really good player who is a general become a cook. Then when he beats a Sargent or who ever, the points exchange is bigger. That would be annoying.
Re:

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:16 pm
by betiko
2dimes wrote:I thought it was interesting that agent86 was angry. I think he has good reason if he takes his points seriously.
Part of why multis are bad is because you could have a really good player who is a general become a cook. Then when he beats a Sargent or who ever, the points exchange is bigger. That would be annoying.
Well if bigwham is a good player, this shouldn t be an issue for too long; he ll just get back to his usual rank and that s it. You know that 1v1 are 80% luck unless the oponent is clueless right? So when you go for a 1v1 you gotta be ready to lose 50 points cause we aren t allowed to be rank restrictive.
Re:

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 7:48 pm
by Dukasaur
2dimes wrote:I thought it was interesting that agent86 was angry. I think he has good reason if he takes his points seriously.
Part of why multis are bad is because you could have a really good player who is a general become a cook. Then when he beats a Sargent or who ever, the points exchange is bigger. That would be annoying.
You have generals who sit turns for cooks. The net effect is the same. As long as it doesn't happen really often, it's statistically meaningless.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:14 pm
by Shannon Apple
In all honesty, I found Agent's report to be quite ridiculous. He's the owner, it makes no difference if he's a multi or not. It's not like he's doing it for personal gain. It is 1000 times more likely that he doesn't want anyone to know who he is, than any attempt to cheat. I would do exactly the same thing in his position. I'd dump this account and start a new one.

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:23 pm
by 2dimes
What if it happens a few times a month?
Re:

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:27 pm
by Gilligan
2dimes wrote:What if it happens a few times a month?
Then we should rename ourselves to the "Conquer Club and some Hot Potatoes"

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:36 pm
by 2dimes
I'm interested in this discussion.
I don't know if there's some solution for agent86. I hope so he seems ok.
Re: The bigWham

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:42 pm
by Shannon Apple
Only solution would be to grow up and understand the owner's situation, and the reason he ditched his old persona.
Why the hell would he make an account a few times a month? That's ridiculous. I think you guys need to leave the poor guy alone and let him get on with improving CC. That's why he bought the place.

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:49 pm
by 2dimes
Shannon Apple wrote:Why the hell would he make an account a few times a month?
Because he likes to relax and play the game Incognito but people keep finding out his new accounts and making threads about them.
Re:

Posted:
Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:58 pm
by betiko
2dimes wrote:Shannon Apple wrote:Why the hell would he make an account a few times a month?
Because he likes to relax and play the game Incognito but people keep finding out his new accounts and making threads about them.
Lol that s quite ridiculous. If he wants to relax and play the game incognito he s got his original account for it. Why bother creating a new one?
Anyway, thought agent s report was just for teasing, thought it was rather funny than someting else. Now if he s for real it s another story... I guess he can get over it!