Conquer Club

Hello, I am in a 3 player game and I have a truce with player B. However, player B then proceeds to take the objectives of the game. I have the opportunity to break this. But that would mean breaking the truce. I know that breaking a truce is not against the rules. But would not attacking player B mean that I am throwing the game which IS against the rules?

You are going to lose if you don't attack them. So why wouldn't you attack them? What is more important to you? Winning or keeping a truce?

One why a truce in a three player game.

2nd if he took the objective attack him, the point is to win and you would be lettin him win if you don't?

no question, attack.