SaMejoHn wrote:machrs wrote:I believe that the requirements to achive Conqueror are to low..right now the our Conqueror has played 420 games of very few maps..sounds high doesn't it...lol pun intended... I believe the Conqueror should have at least 2500 games and should have beat at least 1000 unique opponents..If you are truely a Conqueror!!! if not its just another worthless medal..it should mean something.. tell CC what you think!!!!! something to consider????
I dont understand why everyone is so worked up..I dont think the conqueror title or medal was ever meant to be an indicator of who's the best player on CC. It is merely a title for whoever is on top of the scoreboard. What difference does it make if someone got to that status in 400 games or in 4,000 games or whatever other number.
YES. +1. Like. Stumble. Digg. Upvote.
I'm always astonished by the sheer number of whiny posts that are made complaining about whomever happens to be the conqueror, and I can never understand why so many people ascribe such a long list made-up meanings to the conqueror symbol.
Here's what the conqueror symbol means:
1. The player has the most points out of all of the active players on CC.
That's it!
It doesn't mean any of the following things, no matter how fervently people seem to wish it so:
1. The player is the best CC player IN THE WORLD!!!!$!#!
2. The player is the best CC player at every possible setting!!
3. The player is obligated to play whomever wishes to challenge him or her.
4. The player has super-shiny unobtanium medals in every category!!
5. The player is a beacon of moral light in the seedy CC world.
6. The player is well-spoken and entertaining in the forums.
7. The player has won every game with the fairest and most random of settings, against any and every possible opponent.
8. The player 'deserves' the symbol, according to the whims of GD posters.
Phew. I think that's it.
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:04 pm
...p.s i think you've got them all 
my personal favorite is number 3