Conquer Club

players with less than 50 points should be banned

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

1. should sintom be banned?

Poll ended at Thu May 24, 2007 12:22 pm

 
Total votes : 0

players with less than 50 points should be banned

Postby Georgerx7di on Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:22 pm

2007-04-11 03:27:44 - simtom loses 0 points

This is from one of this players last games. 0 points, thats right. This player has joined over 400 games, and yet never takes a turn. One would think that while your on joining games, that you might bother to take a turn in one that you are already in. There is no doubt that this player is doing this on purpose.

Also, the only time this player ever has won a game was when he/she was in a doubles game along side PassIsPaws, looks fishy to me. They are not multis, I asked wicked to check for me, however it could be two friends abusing the system. Even if not, it bothers me that someone would intentionally make there score get as low as possible.

Maybe there should be a minimum number of points a person looses in a game, maybe 5 or even 2.

I would like to hear how everyone else feels about this.
User avatar
Major Georgerx7di
 
Posts: 2277
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm

Postby Mylittlepuddykat on Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:30 pm

I like the minimum amount of points idea maybe only 1 would be nessessery
(sp)
Image
User avatar
Corporal Mylittlepuddykat
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: Wales

Postby tahitiwahini on Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:55 pm

Mylittlepuddykat wrote:I like the minimum amount of points idea maybe only 1 would be nessessery
(sp)


Yes, simtom should be banned. Not because he has a low score, but because he has deadbeated in hundreds of games on purpose. He has ruined hundreds of games and means to continue ruining games until he is stopped.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
User avatar
Private 1st Class tahitiwahini
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm

Postby jaybebo on Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:14 pm

Got to be tough getting banned around here, but in this instance I could see the need to remove the user and block his ISP from the site. Man, I am new and already giving my opinion about stuff that I should keep my hands out of. :?
User avatar
Corporal jaybebo
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: In the Great Country of Texas

Postby Guilty_Biscuit on Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:21 pm

1) Deadbeats are agreed to be a problem.
Simtom has deadbeated 100s of games.

2) The saving grace of having a deadbeat in your game is that you can win points from them.

It is next to impossible to win points from Simtom becasue his score is so low.

QED Get Simtom to stop the madness.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Guilty_Biscuit
 
Posts: 825
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:33 am
Location: N53:32 W02:39 Top Biscuits: Bourbon, HobNob, Tunnocks Wafer, Ginger Nut Evil_Biscuit: Malted Milk

Postby GrazingCattle on Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:00 pm

I like the minimum points idea but I think the minimum should be mush higher. I am thinking 7 point minimum and if you deadbeat out of the game you lose double. Then if you hit 0 points you are banned.

Problem solved!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby joeyjordison on Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:09 pm

i think a special case should be made for simtom
if someone plays only 5 games say and they just aren't very good but try then they should be punished. if they enjoy playing then they aren't harming anyone. simtom on the other hand is deliberately deadbeating en masse.

he lost 0 points to someone on less than 1000 points. if i played him would he gain points from me just for having got in the game?!?!?!

and wat i really want to see is all the generals playing against simtom.

wat would the points be at stake if simtom won?! :shock:
would he actually reach major?
User avatar
Major joeyjordison
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am

Postby Mylittlepuddykat on Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:24 pm

wat would the points be at stake if simtom won?! Shocked
would he actually reach major?


There is a maximum of 100 points to be lost from each player the most he could get is 500 from a game
Last edited by Mylittlepuddykat on Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Corporal Mylittlepuddykat
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: Wales

Postby joeyjordison on Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:32 pm

Mylittlepuddykat wrote:There is a maximum of 100 points to be lost from each player the most he good get is 500 from a game


i'd forgotten about the limit. without the limit it would hav been funny tho
User avatar
Major joeyjordison
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:10 am

-

Postby Scott-Land on Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:29 pm

Someone's score, however low, shouldn't be the reason to be banned. CC after all is a free site. Do people abuse their privilege ? ....... absolutely. As in Simtom's case- he has deadbeated hundreds of games. This alone should be the reason to ban him.
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: -

Postby GrazingCattle on Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:41 pm

Scott-Land wrote:Someone's score, however low, shouldn't be the reason to be banned. CC after all is a free site. Do people abuse their privilege ? ....... absolutely. As in Simtom's case- he has deadbeated hundreds of games. This alone should be the reason to ban him.


or possibly put him on the newly formed suggested ignore list?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby frood on Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:36 pm

simton has not joined any new games in about three weeks and he is out of all the ones he has active. enough about him!!!!!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant frood
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: Now What.

Postby GrazingCattle on Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:43 pm

frood wrote:simton has not joined any new games in about three weeks and he is out of all the ones he has active. enough about him!!!!!!!


ah someone didn't get their hug today. Fine, I can tell you are starved for attention, so now we will all focus on you.

I am waiting...





















Aren't you gonna do a trick?



















Gee it seems you are quite after all this time. It seems you just wanted to cause a stir over whether we really should stop the simton debate. Then you could feel really good about yourself.





















You make me SICK!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby detlef on Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:53 pm

GrazingCattle wrote:
frood wrote:simton has not joined any new games in about three weeks and he is out of all the ones he has active. enough about him!!!!!!!


ah someone didn't get their hug today. Fine, I can tell you are starved for attention, so now we will all focus on you.

I am waiting...





















Aren't you gonna do a trick?



















Gee it seems you are quite after all this time. It seems you just wanted to cause a stir over whether we really should stop the simton debate. Then you could feel really good about yourself.





















You make me SICK!
Are you freaking high? Can somebody who's bothered to figure out anything about this guy tell me whether he's really a dickhead or just likes to pretend.
User avatar
Major detlef
 
Posts: 1168
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: players with less than 50 points should be banned

Postby chessplaya on Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:00 pm

Georgerx7di wrote:2007-04-11 03:27:44 - simtom loses 0 points

This is from one of this players last games. 0 points, thats right. This player has joined over 400 games, and yet never takes a turn. One would think that while your on joining games, that you might bother to take a turn in one that you are already in. There is no doubt that this player is doing this on purpose.

Also, the only time this player ever has won a game was when he/she was in a doubles game along side PassIsPaws, looks fishy to me. They are not multis, I asked wicked to check for me, however it could be two friends abusing the system. Even if not, it bothers me that someone would intentionally make there score get as low as possible.

Maybe there should be a minimum number of points a person looses in a game, maybe 5 or even 2.



I would like to hear how everyone else feels about this.


correction players with under 300 points should be banned in my point of view they just ruin the game
better then i think any guy that signs in and misses 3 turns in 4 games (which get him kicked out that guy should be also banned from playing
Cheers
Chessplaya
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby GrazingCattle on Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:07 pm

detlef wrote:
GrazingCattle wrote:
frood wrote:simton has not joined any new games in about three weeks and he is out of all the ones he has active. enough about him!!!!!!!


ah someone didn't get their hug today. Fine, I can tell you are starved for attention, so now we will all focus on you.

I am waiting...

Aren't you gonna do a trick?

Gee it seems you are quite after all this time. It seems you just wanted to cause a stir over whether we really should stop the simton debate. Then you could feel really good about yourself.

You make me SICK!
Are you freaking high? Can somebody who's bothered to figure out anything about this guy tell me whether he's really a dickhead or just likes to pretend.


just pretend mate :wink:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Re: players with less than 50 points should be banned

Postby IronE.GLE on Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:52 pm

Georgerx7di wrote:2007-04-11 03:27:44 - simtom loses 0 points

Also, the only time this player ever has won a game was when he/she was in a doubles game along side PassIsPaws, looks fishy to me.
I would like to hear how everyone else feels about this.



That is not true. When simtom actually plays, he plays very well. He joined two escalating games that I was in and while he did miss a couple turns, he won both games. At the time, there were 2 captains and a major in the game I believe.

Anyway, I do believe that do to the amount of games he has ruined by being a deadbeat, simtom should be banned.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.

Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
User avatar
Lieutenant IronE.GLE
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: players with less than 50 points should be banned

Postby GrazingCattle on Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:56 pm

IronE.GLE wrote:
Georgerx7di wrote:2007-04-11 03:27:44 - simtom loses 0 points

Also, the only time this player ever has won a game was when he/she was in a doubles game along side PassIsPaws, looks fishy to me.
I would like to hear how everyone else feels about this.



That is not true. When simtom actually plays, he plays very well. He joined two escalating games that I was in and while he did miss a couple turns, he won both games. At the time, there were 2 captains and a major in the game I believe.

Anyway, I do believe that do to the amount of games he has ruined by being a deadbeat, simtom should be banned.


he has been added to the suggested ignore list. I would admonish all to add him to their list.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant GrazingCattle
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Sooner State

Postby Daring Overlord5 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:00 pm

I have an idea

What if there were games in which people with only low points could join?
Or what if there were games in which people had to have X numed of points to join the game. This would stop him from ruining some games. And there would be less points won/lost in the low points games

I'm not the best and I don't want to be banned if I go to low in points.

Another seggestion
Deadbeat limits
You could have only so many in a given time period (3-5 per month)
just some ideas
User avatar
Sergeant Daring Overlord5
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:13 pm
Location: KANSAS

Postby spiesr on Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:05 pm

Daring Overlord5 wrote:Another seggestion
Deadbeat limits
You could have only so many in a given time period (3-5 per month)
just some ideas
You would stop thewm how?
User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Postby Daring Overlord5 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:07 pm

They could be warned by a PM and/or could be blocked for a certain period of time from joining games ( 1 week to 1 month)
User avatar
Sergeant Daring Overlord5
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:13 pm
Location: KANSAS

Postby spiesr on Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:08 pm

That wouldn't stop simtom...
User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Postby Daring Overlord5 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:09 pm

in EXTREME cases players could be BANNED
User avatar
Sergeant Daring Overlord5
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:13 pm
Location: KANSAS

Postby ParadiceCity9 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:10 pm

i agree that SIMTOM (not siNtom) should be banned...but not necessarily not everyone under 50 pts should be banned...they might suck that bad
Corporal 1st Class ParadiceCity9
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:54 pm

GrazingCattle wrote:I like the minimum points idea but I think the minimum should be mush higher. I am thinking 7 point minimum and if you deadbeat out of the game you lose double. Then if you hit 0 points you are banned.

Problem solved!


I like this idea, but if you drop to lower than 400 points i think you shouldnt be allowed in team games as well
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Next

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users