Conquer Club

can some one run the probabilities of me attacking 33 0n 33 and my opponent having 29 left?

all im saying is the dice here stick just like in the old days

the odds are "CC odds" but remember it is all random--lol--just one of the out of range possibilities

im just saying we need some one to scan the numbers and see when their are 11 6s in a row or 14 1s

This game is no fun without the constant all consuming rage brought on by "random" dice. Dont hate it embrace it because its not going to change.

your recent dice are above average, so I'm not sure how much you can complain.

Army of GOD wrote:your recent dice are above average, so I'm not sure how much you can complain.

IT'S ALL PART OF LACK'S CONSPIRACY.

don't auto... period...-el Jesus negro

owenshooter wrote:don't auto... period...-el Jesus negro

point blank

0.00043%

Possible, just unlikely.

pmchugh wrote:0.00043%

Possible, just unlikely.

NO ITZ IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE I LOST THAT MANY MEN BUT IF I WAS THE ATTACKER AND ONLY LOST 4 GUYS I WOULDNT SAY ANYTHING

ive had it happen to me both ways but im always like wtf was that

Then why is this a problem?

I've never understood that fact that even if the dice are skewed, they're skewed evenly.

I once lost 0-24 straight in a real game of Risk (boardgame) without the opponent having any casualties. Shows that really bad dice are possible even if you tossed them by hand.

Army of GOD wrote:Then why is this a problem?

I've never understood that fact that even if the dice are skewed, they're skewed evenly.

no posting if you are 2 bars and under, cc new rules

Roussallier wrote:I once lost 0-24 straight in a real game of Risk (boardgame) without the opponent having any casualties. Shows that really bad dice are possible even if you tossed them by hand.

Honestly that is good to hear.

I know we all forget about all the normal rolls too, but the frequency of the super bad or super good rolls just seems so dramatic. That is the main issue I think most players have. I just can't imagine a 10v1 ever failing but if I saw it in real life it may change the way I think about CC dice.

i really think everyone on cc would like to see an improved dice system

How do you improve randomness?
This comment is gonna get me a lot of shit on my neck, but that's okay.

Well find another dice randomer..the one that is in use is broken. WWW. RANDOM.ORG is not random..it's just streaky and played over and over again. Depends when you log in and take your turns. Random noise generator my arse

New dice random generator needed. Many complaints about this website..look it up.

86

JBlombier wrote:How do you improve randomness?

Y'all know that adding more sides to the dice increases the attacker's advantage, right?
Similarly, reducing the number of sides on the dice favours the defender.

Just something to consider..

There was a suggestion for something called 'The Golden 6' that I sort of remember. Essentially, instead of all ties going to the defender, they'd go to the attacker. But if you still roll less than your defender, and you think the dice are broken, it doesn't much address that issue!


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:There was a suggestion for something called 'The Golden 6' that I sort of remember. Essentially, instead of all ties going to the defender, they'd go to the attacker. But if you still roll less than your defender, and you think the dice are broken, it doesn't much address that issue!


--Andy

what if we do that and have the dice go 1 to 9 or something

HighlanderAttack wrote:

Roussallier wrote:I once lost 0-24 straight in a real game of Risk (boardgame) without the opponent having any casualties. Shows that really bad dice are possible even if you tossed them by hand.

Honestly that is good to hear.

I know we all forget about all the normal rolls too, but the frequency of the super bad or super good rolls just seems so dramatic. That is the main issue I think most players have. I just can't imagine a 10v1 ever failing but if I saw it in real life it may change the way I think about CC dice.

They're not just any more/less frequent, but we have 1000's of players rolling with huge numbers due to the games being easier to build than irl, so while they may pop-up more often, the ratio of that vs the people playing is normal.

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:

HighlanderAttack wrote:

Roussallier wrote:I once lost 0-24 straight in a real game of Risk (boardgame) without the opponent having any casualties. Shows that really bad dice are possible even if you tossed them by hand.

Honestly that is good to hear.

I know we all forget about all the normal rolls too, but the frequency of the super bad or super good rolls just seems so dramatic. That is the main issue I think most players have. I just can't imagine a 10v1 ever failing but if I saw it in real life it may change the way I think about CC dice.

They're not just any more/less frequent, but we have 1000's of players rolling with huge numbers due to the games being easier to build than irl, so while they may pop-up more often, the ratio of that vs the people playing is normal.

-rd

I went from 150 active down to ten--I still feel I see way too many unrealistic rolls. Like I said it may be from the fact most people including me do not pay attention to the amount of normal rolls that when the crazy rolls come it is shocking. The shock factor just seems to happen way too often for me to not think there is something wrong.

HighlanderAttack wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:

HighlanderAttack wrote:

Roussallier wrote:I once lost 0-24 straight in a real game of Risk (boardgame) without the opponent having any casualties. Shows that really bad dice are possible even if you tossed them by hand.

Honestly that is good to hear.

I know we all forget about all the normal rolls too, but the frequency of the super bad or super good rolls just seems so dramatic. That is the main issue I think most players have. I just can't imagine a 10v1 ever failing but if I saw it in real life it may change the way I think about CC dice.

They're not just any more/less frequent, but we have 1000's of players rolling with huge numbers due to the games being easier to build than irl, so while they may pop-up more often, the ratio of that vs the people playing is normal.

-rd

I went from 150 active down to ten--I still feel I see way too many unrealistic rolls. Like I said it may be from the fact most people including me do not pay attention to the amount of normal rolls that when the crazy rolls come it is shocking. The shock factor just seems to happen way too often for me to not think there is something wrong.

I used to be on the same page as you but think about playing ten games of real risk at a time. Even imagine playing on some of the boards that we do in CC where large stacks are a common thing. You hands would probably be fairly tired rolling that many dice in a couple hours.

i busted out all my board games and rolled 40 dice at a time ten times and the average roll was 3.49

i also rolled dice 1 at a time 100 times i never had a number repeat more than 3 times in a row (average here was 3.5)

i wish cc was like this