Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:23 pm**

Am i the only one that feels that if you have a partner and he deadbeats on you then you shouldn't have to share any points garnered in a game w/ him?

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:25 pm**

gimpyThewonder wrote:Am i the only one that feels that if you have a partner and he deadbeats on you then you shouldn't have to share any points garnered in a game w/ him?

Nope.

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:27 pm**

I agree with this completely too.

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:47 pm**

how many times are people going to recommend this...

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:49 pm**

this is already in suggestions right?

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:00 pm**

I dare say :roll:

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:10 pm**

s.xkitten wrote:how many times are people going to recommend this...

i would say about as many times as it happens to a new person. Sorry i looked around yesterday and couldn't find anything on it. next time i'll spend more hours digging all the way to page 47 of topics before opening my mouth. :oops:

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:48 pm**

until its changed it should be re-mentioned...

Deadbeats are rewarded if their partners win the game by themselves.....

funny how deadbeats are rewarded like that..and get bonus armies.....when they do actually show up from time to time

no wonder so many people do it..there's no punishment for it

I suggest starting a poll for it...not that it will get you anywhere

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:52 pm**

gimpyThewonder wrote:
s.xkitten wrote:how many times are people going to recommend this...

i would say about as many times as it happens to a new person. Sorry i looked around yesterday and couldn't find anything on it. next time i'll spend more hours digging all the way to page 47 of topics before opening my mouth.

Not to put words in kitten's mouth, but I think she may have just been saying it's been noted as an inequity in the scoring system for a long time and hasn't been fixed yet.

So I don't think she was necessarily criticizing the fact that you posted it, but rather the fact that it's still a problem.

I for one don't have a problem with people posting stuff over and over again because they don't know it hasn't been discussed before. It seems to me it acts as drumbeat for needed change.

There are those however who are so put out by someone posting something and "forcing" them to read it, that they will in turn post something criticizing the necessity of the original post and in turn "force" other people to read their post.

I just don't think kitten is one of those people.

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:53 pm**

i blame lackattack...when you join, a little pop up should come up with a list of all things recommended 10,000,000 times... :roll:

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:55 pm**

Then again, sometimes I'm wrong.

Guess I'll keep my words in my own mouth...

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:57 pm**

no no...i'm a sweetie, and understand that the search button sucks, and that threads get buried...i don't blame him...

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:25 pm**

I say: When somebody deadbeats, we find him and burn down his house. :twisted:

As a warning. If he deadbeats again, bah, some people never learn.

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCMENT: BURNINING HOUSES IS BAD. DO NOT TRY TO DO IT AT HOME. THIS WAS JUST A JOKE.

'Cause you never know these days. :roll:

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:31 pm**

I agree with the house burning idea...

Posted: **Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:59 pm**

Me too.

Posted: **Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:28 pm**

Posted: **Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 pm**

Just had it happen to me; "partner" didn't even play a round.

I won anyway. Partner gets 53 points. Boo.

Conquer Club

Sharing points w/ Deadbeat partners

Sharing points w/ Deadbeat partners

Re: Sharing points w/ Deadbeat partners

until its changed

Deadbeats...

Agreed.