afroaction wrote:Being a mod doesn't make you Judge and Jury, but that's the way it is here. All those games active standard & teams games that Rommel & Phulish or any vacationed member that were active in should of been deleted and started over with no winners. Regardless of the accused history or ruling. Second of all Night Stalker how would you feel if someone falsely accused you, and some power hungry mod banns you without notice, fucks up a bunch of your games and teammates? That's whole problem with no public posting on rulings or accusations and swift justice.
Your scenario doesn't work because 1) I haven't broken the rule about multiple accounts and 2) the Hunters aren't power hungry. They have specific tools that help them determine whether or not a person is using multiple accounts. If the evidence is strong enough, the person gets busted. Occasionally a bust is actually a family member, whereby the busted person submits an e-ticket and is reinstated to the site. But those instances are far fewer than the number of accounts that are correctly busted.
If you don't like what happens to games when a player is busted, then submit a solution in the Suggestions forum. Bitching about the Hunters won't help you out.
By the way, you've never even tried to provide evidence that the player was actually innocent. All you've done is attack the hunters for ruining your games (even though it was the player who got busted who did the ruining). What would have actually changed if someone had made the accusation in public and then that player was busted the same day or the next day? Those clan games wouldn't have magically finished immediately and be unaffected by the bust. The person broke the rules of the site and were punished for it. This isn't the public sector where a person gets a trial a year later over some rule-breaking event.
