Conquer Club

The Cyber offices of Juan_Bottom supply friendly, cost-efficient, and rage-fueled support for a variety of difficulties. Our services cover:

• working with you to overturn unfair bannings
• speaking on your behalf during periods of banishment
• working to remove the tarnish left on your record by disgraced megalomaniac redheads
• blocking assholes from talking about your banning
• bringing about the reinstatement of your account that was perma-banned before the new escalating was implemented

The bedrock for the success of the cyber-offices of Juan_Bottom is in the relationship that I have both with my clients, and the moderators. I am selective as to the cases that I accept to ensure that I can devote the proper amount of attention and time to them. Each case evaluation is free and confidential. With the accepting of your payment, and a simple and a letter of intent (for the Moderator's pleasure) you can acquire Juan_Bottom on retainer or for a one time event.
Furthermore, the reputation for Juan_Bottom's council has been earned with repeated bannings and appeals of his own. He understands the difficulties that you face and can bring his unique experiences and perspective to bear for you. So if you've suffered at the hands of a power-lording moderator, PM Juan_Bottom today for your free consultation. . . . And let me, fight for you.

I'll tarnish your record.

I was with you until you started talking shit about redheads.

Lol what's with the redhead hate?

Gillipig wrote:Lol what's with the redhead hate?

Typically, the law doesn't recognize them as beings who have souls. Unless, perhaps, they are daywalkers.

Do you work pro-bono?

Didn't you lose the Blitzaholic case?

That's a serious bad mark on your record... you PERMANENT record, I might add...

notyou2 wrote:Do you work pro-bono?

I do in fact. Generally though, these are important cases that question the boundaries of the law, and the morality of those who enforce/write them. They may not be high-profile, but they are important.

Robinette wrote:Didn't you lose the Blitzaholic case?

Uhhh,... well that wasn't me, and I'm not even sure what happened. Is anyone? But I would consider being a part of the 190th appeal if there will be one.

Juan_Bottom wrote:The Cyber offices of Juan_Bottom supply friendly, cost-efficient, and rage-fueled support for a variety of difficulties. Our services cover:

• working with you to overturn unfair bannings
• speaking on your behalf during periods of banishment
• working to remove the tarnish left on your record by disgraced megalomaniac redheads
• blocking assholes from talking about your banning
• bringing about the reinstatement of your account that was perma-banned before the new escalating was implemented

The bedrock for the success of the cyber-offices of Juan_Bottom is in the relationship that I have both with my clients, and the moderators. I am selective as to the cases that I accept to ensure that I can devote the proper amount of attention and time to them. Each case evaluation is free and confidential. With the accepting of your payment, and a simple and a letter of intent (for the Moderator's pleasure) you can acquire Juan_Bottom on retainer or for a one time event.
Furthermore, the reputation for Juan_Bottom's council has been earned with repeated bannings and appeals of his own. He understands the difficulties that you face and can bring his unique experiences and perspective to bear for you. So if you've suffered at the hands of a power-lording moderator, PM Juan_Bottom today for your free consultation. . . . And let me, fight for you.

How are currently banned players going to know about your services?

Metsfanmax wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:The Cyber offices of Juan_Bottom supply friendly, cost-efficient, and rage-fueled support for a variety of difficulties. Our services cover:

• working with you to overturn unfair bannings
• speaking on your behalf during periods of banishment
• working to remove the tarnish left on your record by disgraced megalomaniac redheads
• blocking assholes from talking about your banning
• bringing about the reinstatement of your account that was perma-banned before the new escalating was implemented

The bedrock for the success of the cyber-offices of Juan_Bottom is in the relationship that I have both with my clients, and the moderators. I am selective as to the cases that I accept to ensure that I can devote the proper amount of attention and time to them. Each case evaluation is free and confidential. With the accepting of your payment, and a simple and a letter of intent (for the Moderator's pleasure) you can acquire Juan_Bottom on retainer or for a one time event.
Furthermore, the reputation for Juan_Bottom's council has been earned with repeated bannings and appeals of his own. He understands the difficulties that you face and can bring his unique experiences and perspective to bear for you. So if you've suffered at the hands of a power-lording moderator, PM Juan_Bottom today for your free consultation. . . . And let me, fight for you.

How are currently banned players going to know about your services?

Seriously?????

They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

Dibbun wrote:They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

I find it unlikely that the upstanding Juan_Bottom would choose to represent such dastardly scum as those who choose to wrongly evade their punishment.

Metsfanmax wrote:

Dibbun wrote:They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

I find it unlikely that the upstanding Juan_Bottom would choose to represent such dastardly scum as those who choose to wrongly evade their punishment.

oooooohhhhhhh...
hooooooooohooooo




.

Metsfanmax wrote:

Dibbun wrote:They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

I find it unlikely that the upstanding Juan_Bottom would choose to represent such dastardly scum as those who choose to wrongly evade their punishment.

Dibbun wrote:They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

Or, less shockingly they come in as guests. lol

Gillipig wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

Dibbun wrote:They will log in under other names, just ask he-who-shall-not-be-named-but-also-should-not-have-been-banned-in-the-first-place.

I find it unlikely that the upstanding Juan_Bottom would choose to represent such dastardly scum as those who choose to wrongly evade their punishment.

It's a fair point, and my personal politics and senses of right and wrong will always effect which cases I accept. As a CC cyber-consul, I cannot betray anything that a client or potential client would tell me in confidence. However, I would never accept a scumbag who earned their ban for a client. As always, it's a question of justice.