Conquer Club

Wondering whether pictures of a flaccid member are viewed as against community guidelines. I know someone that is rather shy, they believe they have a package worth talking about, and are wondering whether a tasteful photo, or maybe a silhouette would be allowed as a sig or avatar. I'm sure if allowed would be a great conversation starter, and help my friend talk to people. I know there are restrictions on nipples. So trying to get a clearer picture of what pictures of a personal nature are allowed.

Thanks in advance community for your well thought out, and on topic replies.

Sory Bogan...Ovine phalluses, silhouette or otherise, are bit beyond the pale...tell your friend that they are baaa-ed....

As an owner of an enormous penis, I take offense to this site's censorship of it's members.

As much as we'd all like to see a pack of peoples packages protruding around the forums, it's a no.

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:As much as we'd all like to see a pack of peoples packages protruding around the forums, it's a no.

-rd

in other wosrd, yes it is wrong, no you are not allowed to do this.

also, please refrain of making these kind of threads. Children do frequent this site and its basicly vexing me to see these kind of insincere threads. Use your common sense please.

Bogan, I am often eating dinner while I read the CC forum. Therefore, anything you wish to present is unacceptable if it would not be allowed at my dinner table.

SirSebstar wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:As much as we'd all like to see a pack of peoples packages protruding around the forums, it's a no.

-rd

in other wosrd, yes it is wrong, no you are not allowed to do this.

also, please refrain of making these kind of threads. Children do frequent this site and its basicly vexing me to see these kind of insincere threads. Use your common sense please.

r2d2 answered the question nicely. Thanks. SirSebstar, I'm an adult, this is as far as I know an adult site. IE Adults use it, and have adult discussions. Which I believe this to be. My common sense may be different to others, people aren't sheep, mores the pity. So individuals have different views on different topics. Look at usernames some of them are very offensive. Avatars that are allowed, some of the moving pictures of bouncing female body parts are erotic. QED There is a hell of a lot of grey area as to what is acceptable and what is not. r2d2 answered the question, which I'll thank him/her/it for doing so. Sebstar don't push your conservative body hating prejudices onto me or the community.

Sebstar why are you on this site anyway? Since you obviously think you can read minds, why aren't you out in the big bad world making money off that skill. Insincere thread?? More likely a narrow minded prejudiced judgmental body hating bigot incorrectly judging a paying user of site. Lucky I have broad shoulders. This is interesting, another thread I started in general was a discussion concerning mods. A theme in that thread from the community, current mods, and ex mods. Is that mods bring their own personal hangups and biases into their duties on site. Part and parcel of being human. I'm glad sebstar that you show enough restraint to state a personal opinion without reaching for the official pen. Well done.

BoganGod wrote: r2d2 answered the question, which I'll thank him/her/it for doing so.

It, please.

Also, Seb I think meant threads that aren't very serious (i.e, you knew you couldn't post a pic of a package, right?) and in that vein I understand him. But if we're done here, I guess that's it?

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:

BoganGod wrote: r2d2 answered the question, which I'll thank him/her/it for doing so.

It, please.

Also, Seb I think meant threads that aren't very serious (i.e, you knew you couldn't post a pic of a package, right?) and in that vein I understand him. But if we're done here, I guess that's it?

-rd

I think sebs problem is that he consistently mis answers questions in Q&A or repeats answers for no reason when they have already been answered many times. And then to top it off he adds his personal opinions into the conversation most of which have nothing to do with the question asked. In this instance he may have been right but hey even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.

ljex wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:

BoganGod wrote: r2d2 answered the question, which I'll thank him/her/it for doing so.

It, please.

Also, Seb I think meant threads that aren't very serious (i.e, you knew you couldn't post a pic of a package, right?) and in that vein I understand him. But if we're done here, I guess that's it?

-rd

I think sebs problem is that he consistently mis answers questions in Q&A or repeats answers for no reason when they have already been answered many times. And then to top it off he adds his personal opinions into the conversation most of which have nothing to do with the question asked. In this instance he may have been right but hey even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.

Though I'm sure seb views his standard operating procedure as playing to his strengths.

Thanks all for your help, saddens me to say that CC will be a safer ocular zone, but will be lacking the zest it may have had.