Conquer Club

In this game, it came down to 3 players. Myself, Geedubyah, and Union.

They both own two bonuses and are well fortified in a no cards game. Im the weakest player, have no bonus, only receiving 3 armies per turn.

These two ask for a truce with each other against me until Im dead so, "One of us will come on top" instead of me.

I leave my feedback and get some in return. You guys decide, who is the douche in this game.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=284805

After looking at the game, i have to say that these two are obvious cheesewankers. Thanx for the heads up - i'm definitely adding them to my ignore list.

Even though I kind of see, the reason why they did it (to guarantee you won't screw one of them over, i saw it happen so many times), their feedback is a revenge feedback and will be removed by wicked, if you let her know. And you are definitely entitled to leave them a negative feedback, if you feel so.

In fact, if you had an option, that none of you deserve the negative feedback, I would vote for that.

union was an idiot for accepting the offer. A really big idiot. And GeeDubYah displayed some really bad sportsmanship. An alliance between 2 players in a game with 3 players left until one is dead? That's bullshit.

I can understand why you are pissed off. Hell, I've been in your place far too many times . But let's be honest, if you wanted to play a fair and square game you would have gone to play The Sims or something similar. This is war and diplomacy game, and as such, they have done nothing against the rules. After all they were just covering their asses.

I think you mean they were benig asses...

Exactly. There are players who are honorable, and players who stay within the rules, but have no heart, and are more concerned with their rank than playing a good game. Gameplay like this may be legal, but it's cowardly and low.

Generally,I think alliances and intimidation are a part of the game,allthough one doesn't have to like them.But that alliance was just total bullshit.There's no sportsmanship in agreeing to wipe out the weakest player on board just for the win and some points.Even if it is within the game rules.Clearly these players haven't got the words integrity and gentleman-like conduct in their vocabulary.I'd be pissed too.

My thoughts exactly. Thank you. Alliances come and go but to say "lets call a truce until WMW is eliminated so one of us can win" is just straight bs

You forgot the ''Neither because leaving negative feedback regarding alliances in a game is stupid'' option. So, instead I left it for the deucebag who started this thread and is complaining about diplomacy. I'm almost entirely sure you would be grateful had the shoe been on the other foot.

It may be cowardly and low, but in the end you're trying to win, and anything you can do to put yourself in more of a position to do that is still strategy, and that is what the game's about.

Hologram wrote:You forgot the ''Neither because leaving negative feedback regarding alliances in a game is stupid'' option. So, instead I left it for the deucebag who started this thread and is complaining about diplomacy. I'm almost entirely sure you would be grateful had the shoe been on the other foot.

Im not a pussy who makes alliances. And who the f*ck are you? exactly you waste of life