Conquer Club

I have now decided to QUIT playing Conquer Club games
that require 1 or more teammates!

Why?

Cuz most of the time (so far) I've noticed at least 1 of my teammates playing like a spy to the other team
and/or playing so bad that it hurts me more than the rest of my team.

Something is "fishy" with that
so I am sick of that variable.

I now will rather play free-for-alls,
which still sometimes have secret allies, but it's not as bad or as insulting as supposed teammates privately back-stabbing you.

So yeah,
no more teammate games for me...

Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are also not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

natty_dread wrote:Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are also not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

Fixed that for you.

natty_dread wrote:Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

Fixed That For You:
Thanks for the advice.
I'll definitely consider it...

Dibbun wrote:

natty_dread wrote:Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are also not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

Fixed that for you.

lol,
ummm, you didn't change a single word of his, so what did you fix?

Bush of Obama wrote:

Dibbun wrote:

natty_dread wrote:Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are also not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

Fixed that for you.

lol,
ummm, you didn't change a single word of his, so what did you fix?

He bolded some words to make a new sentence that more exactly shows his disdain for forumites

Bush of Obama wrote:

Dibbun wrote:

natty_dread wrote:Don't play with random teammates. If you want to find people to play with who are also not total dickbutts, you should start hanging around the forums.

Fixed that for you.

lol,
ummm, you didn't change a single word of his, so what did you fix?

Hint: read the boldfaced part...

Ahhh, the boldfarced part! hahaha
Yeah, I noticed that already, but I figured that change was insignificant since it kept the original meanings intact!

"sorry" Dibbun! LOL
Besides, Dibbun is a hypocrite with that change, cuz he uses the Forums!

In my latest "teams" game:

//2011-07-01 11:55:30 - teammate [team]: im gonna go for iceland.
2011-07-01 23:59:23 - Bush of Obama [team]: ok, sure
2011-07-02 00:00:37 - Bush of Obama [team]: i'm going for swealand
2011-07-02 00:01:25 - Bush of Obama [team]: but i think i'll go first for Northern Norway
2011-07-02 00:04:03 - Bush of Obama [team]: warning: i'll be reinforcing Trandenlag from Feroyer...how many turns do you prefer i take to do so? my first turn, or my second, or my third?
2011-07-03 11:07:04 - teammate [team]: you should go for south norway, i have half of swealand with more troops so i can just take that and ill keep reinforcing you once i get iceland next turn
[what the BS? Ummm, his/her advice to me would make my situation worse, which it did, and his worse as well, which it did, but I assumed the best and we heavily started losing then cuz I took his/her losing-on-purpose advice!]
2011-07-03 16:13:43 - Bush of Obama: it looks like i'll lose before you will then...[talking to my teammate, but in public this time]
2011-07-04 14:17:03 - Bush of Obama [team]: This was stupid...I should never have accepted your iceland request. Sorry that I did.
And you missed your turn in round 2 too...are you an alias of red/green?

2011-07-05 02:01:21 - Bush of Obama: I attacked my "teammate" cuz he/she was playing like he/she is an alias of one of the two of you. He/She was playing to lose with my team, so that your team would win.
2011-07-05 02:53:18 - opponent: sorry to hear that but accusations of cheating are both completely false and also a bit insulting to us
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

2011-07-05 02:01:21 - Team Killer: I attacked my "teammate" cuz he/she was playing like he/she is an alias of one of the two of you. He/She was playing to lose with my team, so that your team would win.

Note to self. Do not play team games with ^

derp wrote:
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

Translation: Why did you attack my weakened teammate? That makes no sense, in a team game why would you want to eliminate the weaker player and make the game end quicker when I am stronger than my teammate and can make this drag out longer? You must be allied with each other! Fucking cheaters! Thats it, its the only rational explanation!

jefjef wrote:

2011-07-05 02:01:21 - Team Killer: I attacked my "teammate" cuz he/she was playing like he/she is an alias of one of the two of you. He/She was playing to lose with my team, so that your team would win.

Note to self. Do not play team games with ^

You obviously ignored the "strategy" employed by my "teammate" and the responses I was getting.

Crazyirishman wrote:

derp wrote:
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

Translation: Why did you attack my weakened teammate? That makes no sense, in a team game why would you want to eliminate the weaker player and make the game end quicker when I am stronger than my teammate and can make this drag out longer? You must be allied with each other! Fucking cheaters! Thats it, its the only rational explanation!

No, it's why would the opponent attack a player who no longer stands a chance of winning AND is playing lousy anyway?
(don't say it's to end the game sooner, or else they'd have attacked that person in the beginning and avoided me)

Bush of Obama wrote:

Crazyirishman wrote:

derp wrote:
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

Translation: Why did you attack my weakened teammate? That makes no sense, in a team game why would you want to eliminate the weaker player and make the game end quicker when I am stronger than my teammate and can make this drag out longer? You must be allied with each other! Fucking cheaters! Thats it, its the only rational explanation!

No, it's why would the opponent attack a player who no longer stands a chance of winning AND is playing lousy anyway?
(don't say it's to end the game sooner, or else they'd have attacked that person in the beginning and avoided me)

Mr. Derp, if your teammate does not stand a chance of winning, even if he's played the worst possible game in CC history, you dont stand a chance of winning in a no spoils game unless you happen to be capable of mounting the most grand magfunkingnificent comeback in history by yourself. If your opponent attacks another player who happens to be on your team then, they are indirectly attacking you. In dubs, it would be poor strategy esp on a larger map like nordic countries for two player to randomly decide "lets only attack this one, the other guys won't know what to do."

Crazyirishman wrote:

Bush of Obama wrote:

Crazyirishman wrote:

derp wrote:
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

Translation: Why did you attack my weakened teammate? That makes no sense, in a team game why would you want to eliminate the weaker player and make the game end quicker when I am stronger than my teammate and can make this drag out longer? You must be allied with each other! Fucking cheaters! Thats it, its the only rational explanation!

No, it's why would the opponent attack a player who no longer stands a chance of winning AND is playing lousy anyway?
(don't say it's to end the game sooner, or else they'd have attacked that person in the beginning and avoided me)

Mr. Derp, if your teammate does not stand a chance of winning, even if he's played the worst possible game in CC history, you dont stand a chance of winning in a no spoils game unless you happen to be capable of mounting the most grand magfunkingnificent comeback in history by yourself. If your opponent attacks another player who happens to be on your team then, they are indirectly attacking you. In dubs, it would be poor strategy esp on a larger map like nordic countries for two player to randomly decide "lets only attack this one, the other guys won't know what to do."

Hmmm, I wonder how you knew it was a no spoils game, unless one of the 3 other players (4 of us) in this game, either told you,
or unless you are one of them under another account name?

Ok, NOW it all makes sense!

My "teammate" has game name that represents having his teammates lose.
(I didn't bother to really look at his username till now)

So yeah, he intentionally lost, so his other account(s) would win...

Bush of Obama wrote:

Crazyirishman wrote:

Bush of Obama wrote:

Crazyirishman wrote:

derp wrote:
2011-07-05 09:48:50 - Bush of Obama: If you're telling the truth, red, why did you attack defenseless blue? [blue only had 1 army on only 1 territory, which didn't help red or blue get any country] You should have went directly after me instead.//

Translation: Why did you attack my weakened teammate? That makes no sense, in a team game why would you want to eliminate the weaker player and make the game end quicker when I am stronger than my teammate and can make this drag out longer? You must be allied with each other! Fucking cheaters! Thats it, its the only rational explanation!

No, it's why would the opponent attack a player who no longer stands a chance of winning AND is playing lousy anyway?
(don't say it's to end the game sooner, or else they'd have attacked that person in the beginning and avoided me)

Mr. Derp, if your teammate does not stand a chance of winning, even if he's played the worst possible game in CC history, you dont stand a chance of winning in a no spoils game unless you happen to be capable of mounting the most grand magfunkingnificent comeback in history by yourself. If your opponent attacks another player who happens to be on your team then, they are indirectly attacking you. In dubs, it would be poor strategy esp on a larger map like nordic countries for two player to randomly decide "lets only attack this one, the other guys won't know what to do."

Hmmm, I wonder how you knew it was a no spoils game, unless one of the 3 other players (4 of us) in this game, either told you,
or unless you are one of them under another account name?

He looked up the games that you've played and found one that matched? Anyone with an account can see all da games.

^ //He looked up the games that you've played and found one that matched? Anyone with an account can see all da games.//

Ok, good point.
I admit that I made an error with that.
But at least I do my research and apologize (sorry CrazyIrishman, for accusing you of being one of the players in this map) when I realize I've made an error.
I hope he now does the same, about not researching how the game went and all the comments made in the chat room.
If he does, he'll notice that my accusations about the player(s) in that map game are correct.
Otherwise, he's being as lazy as I was regarding what the rest of you can see.

If you are accusing them of cheating, why not open a C&A report to check if they're multi's or something?

Leehar wrote:If you are accusing them of cheating, why not open a C&A report to check if they're multi's or something?

Good question.
What's the link to doing so?
And I wish I could do that with some of the other "team" maps.
(not all of them, but most of them, some more blatant than this one)

Get a solid crew together, and you will find that team games are easier than non team games. Sadly you have to wait longer between turns which as a freemium would sux for you. You could of course buy membership.

With your username I was so hoping your avatar picture would be something completely different to what it is gutted bro.

With my photo, I was not going to have a picture of Obama having female genitilia, "sorry" to disappoint you.

Bush of Obama wrote:With my photo, I was not going to have a picture of Obama having female genitilia, "sorry" to disappoint you.

my poor confused noobite. Once you are of an age to grow some, you may realise that there is a distinct difference between genitalia and pubic hair(bush). I don't think I should be taking the place of your school or parents by educating you on the facts of life. Lets just leave it as "when your older you'll understand". Don't wish to be seen to be corrupting a minor.

I know that there is a difference between genitalia and pubic hair.
But the slang word "bush" for that location, refers to females, not males, even though it literally can mean either.

So quit being an arse.
If you don't like my comments and/or photos and/or username and your responses continue to be of a condescending arrogant idiotic nature, then please discontinue commenting on my threads or to my posts.
Thank you in advance, BG.

RESPECT THE THREAD - STAY ON TOPIC!

Team games - team play.

jefjef wrote:RESPECT THE THREAD - STAY ON TOPIC!

Team games - team play.

Exactly!
Thanks man!