Conquer Club

I just went up against a Neutral territory.

9 vs. 5

... and it came out 2 vs. 2 on auto-attack.

The dice are obviously rigged.

I would like a refund!

jim, shut up. if this site was super duper, you'd hand over $25 and play more games, but the site isn't and you haven't.

are you joke? man i lost in one game 15 and kill 3,and i dont announce that, but you announce these small loss. These is nothing

On behalf of CC, I would like to pay for the refund amount of:

$00.00 Zero dollars and zero cents
You may receive a check in the mail any day now from me, have a fine day

-rd

qwert wrote:Grammar Correction: Are you joking? Man, in one game I had 15 and killed 3,and I didn't announce that, but you announced this small loss. This is nothing

And if it were true, Jim, then nobody would be playing the AORS and fuedal

I like the originality of this thread. Before I haven't seen someone complain specifically about rolls against neutral territories.

Pedronicus wrote:jim, shut up. if this site was super duper, you'd hand over $25 and play more games, but the site isn't and you haven't.

Actually I have... I was a Premium before I "quit".

Then I shortly after I fell off the wagon my Premium expired and I have yet to re-up. If you look you will see I have 6 active games... a sign of a recent Premium -> Freemium conversion.

I was actually going to create a poll in the SIB Forum to ask members if they think I should re-up my paid membership.

qwert wrote:are you joke? man i lost in one game 15 and kill 3,and i dont announce that, but you announce these small loss. These is nothing

I am not a joke... at least I do not think I am.

niMic wrote:

No... it's not.

rdsrds2120 wrote:On behalf of CC, I would like to pay for the refund amount of:

$00.00 Zero dollars and zero cents
You may receive a check in the mail any day now from me, have a fine day

-rd

Thank you... I am not sure how you expect to send me my refund check, since you never asked for my address. If you PM me I will provide it for you.

I would suggest you write "VOID" on the check so I can't tamper with it and change the $00.00 to $100.00 or something nefarious like that.

Once I receive the check I will black out the account and transfer numbers and scan an image and post on here so people can see you lived up to your word.

You have committed to this as an Official CC Representative... yes?

jleonnn wrote:

qwert wrote:Grammar Correction: Are you joking? Man, in one game I had 15 and killed 3,and I didn't announce that, but you announced this small loss. This is nothing

And if it were true, Jim, then nobody would be playing the AORS and fuedal

Thank you for that correction. To answer qwert's intended question (as opposed to his actual question)... I am in fact joking.

Not about the fact that I lost 9 vs. 5... but that I think the dice are "rigged".

Though actually that could be a cool option... to have Neutral's be harder to take down if someone gets booted out of a game, or on screens were there are lots of Neutrals

Joodoo wrote:I like the originality of this thread. Before I haven't seen someone complain specifically about rolls against neutral territories.

It was only a matter of time before someone did it.

I am trying to cover all possible angles of the Dice Bitch phenomema.

"qwert wrote:
Grammar Correction: Are you joking? Man, in one game I had 15 and killed 3,and I didn't announce that, but you announced this small loss. This is nothing"
maybe he forget but betwen "had" and "15" need to be "lost".

Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information

-rd

rdsrds2120 wrote:Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information

-rd

Yes... or I can be annoying and reply to each person individually.

Isn't my way more personal?

"Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information :
hmm,these give me idea for new medal-concecutive post medal achivement

-rd

jimboston wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information

-rd

Yes... or I can be annoying and reply to each person individually.

Isn't my way more personal?

You can quote the guys, therefore replying to everyone in a single post.

qwert wrote:"Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information :
hmm,these give me idea for new medal-concecutive post medal achivement

-rd

A

jleonnn wrote:

jimboston wrote:

rdsrds2120 wrote:Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information

-rd

Yes... or I can be annoying and reply to each person individually.

Isn't my way more personal?

You can quote the guys, therefore replying to everyone in a single post.

Takes effort.

qwert wrote:"Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information :
hmm,these give me idea for new medal-concecutive post medal achivement

-rd

O

qwert wrote:"Whoa jim, you have a lot of consecutive posts there. Remember you can edit your posts to include more information :
hmm,these give me idea for new medal-concecutive post medal achivement

-rd

G

Would win that Medal first.

Apparently you're the only one replying to your own post ;P

jleonnn wrote:Apparently you're the only one replying to your own post ;P

Yes.

I enjoy talking to myself in real life too.

I'm the only one intelligent enough to keep up with me.
Or not.