score of 0

[benjij]

Benji, wanna play Doubles

Direstraits..good rock group,, they make few good song in the 90:)
sure i will play you double ,,i notice all general and good players alway play double or triple,,mean they cant win alone;)
joking

I meant with you as my partner. Good way too get more points to make Captain, or more likely to stay at Lt.

that the part i dont realy like/get ,,when risk was realy a board game,,i was playing whit friend for real(still play whit my friend),was like,, mabye i am 36,,let say 20 year ago ,,lol. then there was no double or triple team..but YES set private game,,and message me pass,,on my mns benjijj53@hotmail.com:)
i bet you make good team in double:),,,and win alot of point if we win lol:)

[Geographical]

Benji, wanna play Doubles

Direstraits..good rock group,, they make few good song in the 90:)
sure i will play you double ,,i notice all general and good players alway play double or triple,,mean they cant win alone;)
joking

I meant with you as my partner. Good way too get more points to make Captain, or more likely to stay at Lt.

that the part i dont realy like/get ,,when risk was realy a board game,,i was playing whit friend for real(still play whit my friend),was like,, mabye i am 36,,let say 20 year ago ,,lol. then there was no double or triple team..but YES set private game,,and message me pass,,on my mns benjijj53@hotmail.com:)
i bet you make good team in double:),,,and win alot of point if we win lol:)

Benjij... why dont you really get a score of 0? you will be able to show off your score... cirtainly no one else will have such score...

[Jamie]

If there was no 100 point rule (which is retarded), if Benji beat the five highest rated players on the site, he'd get 3,392 pts, and move from a 99 point Private, and 12409 place (DEAD LAST) to a 3,492 Point GENERAL, and be in 2nd place, with only Blitz in front of him. Can you imagine, private, to General in one game. Actually Blitz would lose so many points, Benji, would be in FIRST place if this happened. Blitz would lose 842 points, but he'd still be General. Must be good to know you can take a 842 point beat down, and still be a General.

[qeee1]

If there was no 100 point rule (which is retarded), if Benji beat the five highest rated players on the site, he'd get 3,392 pts, and move from a 99 point Private, and 12409 place (DEAD LAST) to a 3,492 Point GENERAL, and be in 2nd place, with only Blitz in front of him. Can you imagine, private, to General in one game. Actually Blitz would lose so many points, Benji, would be in FIRST place if this happened. Blitz would lose 842 points, but he'd still be General. Must be good to know you can take a 842 point beat down, and still be a General.

The 100 point rule is not retarded, it was implemented to prevent people deliberately losing games in an effort to abuse the scoring system.

[The1exile]

The 100 point rule is not retarded, it was implemented to prevent people deliberately losing games in an effort to abuse the scoring system.

How are they going to abuse it?

[qeee1]

The 100 point rule is not retarded, it was implemented to prevent people deliberately losing games in an effort to abuse the scoring system.

How are they going to abuse it?

Picture this a player gets down to 10 points somehow. Now if he beats a player whos on 1000 points he gets 20X(1000/10)=2000. If he beats 5 of them that's 8000 points.

It's easy enough to win a game with 5 colonels, or at least far easier than it would be to earn 8000 points.

[AAFitz]

It's easy enough to win a game with 5 colonels

for some

[Jamie]

Name me some Colonels, or Majors, or Captains, or LT"s, or even Sgts who would be dumb enought to get themselves involved in a game with someone who had 10 pts, or even 100 points. They'd probably beat that person, but get 1 point, maybe none for doing it. Why risk hundreds of points to get one?

[AAFitz]

i dont think there is any question the 100 point stopping point is necessary...scores would become meaningless without it....

[gavin_sidhu]

The lowest ranked player im suprised about is blackadder. I played a game with him in his first game as a partner and as my feedback says:

Great team player. Was a new player and was first unsure about whether he would stay to play the game, but in the end not only did he play the game, he won the game for us.


I wonder how he got so lost, maybe just a streak of really bad luck.

[qeee1]

Name me some Colonels, or Majors, or Captains, or LT"s, or even Sgts who would be dumb enought to get themselves involved in a game with someone who had 10 pts, or even 100 points. They'd probably beat that person, but get 1 point, maybe none for doing it. Why risk hundreds of points to get one?

Some of us aren't afraid to enter public games. Anyway the point still holds. I mean you can just replace the scenario with the player dropping to 5 points and playing 5 1000 point players...

[Begbie]

If you can get to zero you MUST GO TO THE HATCH, ENTER THE CODE, AND PRESS THE BUTTON!!!!!!!

[wcaclimbing]

lol

but what if benjij won a battle royale game!?!?!?!??!!!!!

i bet half the people would just attack his opponents and let him win( i know i would


114 opponents x 100 points per person= winning 11,400 points!!

[sully800]

Actually qeee, the math you did before was for 5 people at 1000 points, not 2000.

Jamie, just think about it for a few seconds and you might realize why the score cap was put on.

First of all, if someone joins a public game last the others in the game have no ability to keep them out. So it would be very easy for a person with 10 points to get into a public game. Besides, when joining a game it only displays your ranks- you can't tell the difference between a private with 999 points and a private with 10 points. Of course without a point cap a private with 10 points would wreck everyones score and ruin the point system, but you can't see that by looking at the rank. Do you get it now? The easiest way to get to the top was to start with the lowest score possible.

In theory if you could get a score of 1 point and win a game with 5 players at 1000 points each you would have 100,000 points total. Everyone thinks its amazing that Blitz has 4100 points, but without a score cap it wouldn't be hard to get 25+ times his score, it would just take a long time and a lot of losses.

So do you still think the 100 point cap is retarded?

[AAFitz]

Actually qeee, the math you did before was for 5 people at 1000 points, not 2000.

Jamie, just think about it for a few seconds and you might realize why the score cap was put on.

First of all, if someone joins a public game last the others in the game have no ability to keep them out. So it would be very easy for a person with 10 points to get into a public game. Besides, when joining a game it only displays your ranks- you can't tell the difference between a private with 999 points and a private with 10 points. Of course without a point cap a private with 10 points would wreck everyones score and ruin the point system, but you can't see that by looking at the rank. Do you get it now? The easiest way to get to the top was to start with the lowest score possible.

In theory if you could get a score of 1 point and win a game with 5 players at 1000 points each you would have 100,000 points total. Everyone thinks its amazing that Blitz has 4100 points, but without a score cap it wouldn't be hard to get 25+ times his score, it would just take a long time and a lot of losses.

So do you still think the 100 point cap is retarded?

technically we should only be able to take the points of another player, so he would only send them back to zero and take every last point, but not take more than that......but then theyd be at zero and be able to do the same thing....the game would be senseless....it would be fun for a day though

[hendy]

it would be scary to see some1 so low to beat blitz and the other top 4

[wcaclimbing]

too bad they can only lose max of 100 points

if a guy with 100 beat a guy with 4000, he would win 800 points.

[AAFitz]

if he had one point and beat 5 generals with 3000 points hed win 300000 points assuming the points could be created out of the air

[qeee1]

Yeah and meanwhile the generals would be on minus scores.

Anyway yeah point is the score system has been regulated for a reason.

Also thanks for correcting my maths.

[sully800]

It's amazing how wide the score range is all of the sudden.

Blitz at 4213- incredible of course....well beyond the 'impossible' 4000 declared so many months ago

But benji is now all the way down to 77. With no score cap he'd be able to take 1100 points off of Blitz.

The scary part is that Blitz would still be #6

[benjij]

It's amazing how wide the score range is all of the sudden.

Blitz at 4213- incredible of course....well beyond the 'impossible' 4000 declared so many months ago

But benji is now all the way down to 77. With no score cap he'd be able to take 1100 points off of Blitz.

The scary part is that Blitz would still be #6

717 now look carefully:)

[Geographical]

It's amazing how wide the score range is all of the sudden.

Blitz at 4213- incredible of course....well beyond the 'impossible' 4000 declared so many months ago

But benji is now all the way down to 77. With no score cap he'd be able to take 1100 points off of Blitz.

The scary part is that Blitz would still be #6

717 now look carefully:)

Just get 0 will you? See if you go back to a new recruit or not.

[benjij]

It's amazing how wide the score range is all of the sudden.

Blitz at 4213- incredible of course....well beyond the 'impossible' 4000 declared so many months ago

But benji is now all the way down to 77. With no score cap he'd be able to take 1100 points off of Blitz.

The scary part is that Blitz would still be #6

717 now look carefully:)

Just get 0 will you? See if you go back to a new recruit or not.

nah,,to late now,,,
i was close but now i am back in life,,give me 1 year and i will be general,,lol

14 feb07,,let see in 1 year;),,no more 0 rating thing