
Moderator: Community Team
alex_white101 wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:max is gr8 wrote:I think it was the right thing
Spamalot in itself is ridiculous if it is about spam you should not allow it
Remember: Ignorant one line opinions = just as worthless as spam, but more annoying.
it was two lines
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Great Pretender wrote:AK rules!
You guys were told on April 1st that is was going to be locked/deleted.
You had one month and 15 days to complain.
You had your chance.
AAFitz wrote:Personally, if space is truly the concern here, I think posts that have been inactive for 6 months or even a year should be deleted with a clear statement posting such, so its not subjective. cheating ones might have to stay, but certainly any flame a year old has pretty much served its purpose.
If it was deleted only on the basis that it was spam, I think perhaps the 4000 or so posts AK has made could be looked at....I mean seriously...hes played 800 or so games...and has 4 or 5 times as many posts...and ive seen as much spam from him as anyone. Now I understand many of that count are official, but I doubt that will account for more than half. Not to mention, many of his posts really do have a condescending tone... bordering on outright negative.
It seems to me he deletes subjectively, with personal motives. If thats the policy in here than so be it, but to me subjectively deleting posts is going to be damn counter productive to fostering a positive attitude in here.
Im not suggesting all spam should be allowed. Im sure half of my posts are one liner sarcastic jibes...some positive, some negative that I posted only to make myself feel like im funny...some probably were...some definitely werent....but, the forum is the place where most communicate, and it that communication is going to be subjectively deleted for what many consider personal reasons...it will probably result in far less of it....and therefore far less interested players...ie less players
Personally, i have nothing against AK. Hes just a 21 year old kid trying to handle a lot of responsibility, but I do think he could show a little more professionalism, if the goal of this site is to be professional.
I once before suggested a clear policy statement about the requirements for deleting threads....I once again think it may be a good idea to either start gaining space somewhere else, or make it clear to everyone which threads will be deleted, and which wont. Otherwise, this will be a never ending battle, that will never make the site a better place.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:ice got pissed and felt it neccassary(knew i spelled that wrong...) to delete it
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Dancing Mustard wrote:max is gr8 wrote:I think it was the right thing
Spamalot in itself is ridiculous if it is about spam you should not allow it
Oh do shut up. Go read the thread on the matter (Lack I have a letter for you; now locked).
It's been more than adequately explained that:
1. This is not about deleting spam threads; it's about capricious moderator actions. It's a complaint about AK acting in a discriminatory matter.
2. Furthermore, it has been conceded by many that Spamalot was not 'all spam', and that the spam contained there was not 'just spam'.
3. It's has also been noted on multiple occasssions that the benefits of a Spamalot thread outweighed the drawbacks of any spam contained therein.
So sorry Max. You just said something dumb. Go do your homework, there's really nothing more to be said about this subject until we get a comment from Lack, Andy or AK.
It's high time we stopped posting about the issue ad infinitum; but I refuse to just sit about and listen to people make ignorant posts insulting a group of which I am a member.
Remember: Ignorant one line opinions = just as worthless as spam, but more annoying.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:ice got pissed and felt it neccassary(knew i spelled that wrong...) to delete it
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
wacicha wrote:lol max is that you -- you have matured!! do you remember the times when all you wanted was to post good comment
I assure the people who voted that AK was right are probably not aware of the situation completely. They probably play games and just vote polls. The people who truly love this forum and are on everyday are in support .wicked wrote:I know Spamalot feels slighted. But I hope they are looking at this poll, and reading the entire community's reaction, with open minds. It should become clear to them that mindless spam and hijacking threads is not as liked as they once believed.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users