how the dice works for newbies, even premium

[rhp 1]

dude.. you're bent...

[freakns]

Aslan you got it all right! at least in those few words...

i am
an idiot

rest you said makes no sense at all...

1800 higher rank?

[rhp 1]

you think you're so good, but you're really not, especially if you can't even keep above 1600 easily.

i havent checked the scoreboard, if there are more over 1600, ore if the mayority is less then 1600,
go and check it out.

I think the only indicator if someone is good, average or really bad is the percentage of won games, i would say anybody below 10 percent won games up from 200 played games is really bad-
i could be wrong, those with 50 percent wins must be very good, i dont know how they do it,
its not only the playstyle, its that many other factors are countet in it.

Every single thing you say is wrong,I have a 58% win rate,as a Captain which is far from very good.I cant make up my mind whether you are as thick as a lot of people think or you are just winding us up.Even a stopped clock is right twice a day..

i would be happy with 58 percent winrate, honestly, that is an indication of a good player, i would say though,
many other factors are countet in ( what i mean is, do you play 1vs1 or 1 vs 8, etc...)

win % means little... depends on the types of games, and more importantly the number of players.. you sound more clueless the more you type

[rhp 1]

Dude, shut the hell up. You wanna know the reason your points go down so much when you're a higher rank? BECAUSE YOU LOSE MORE OF THEM! And when you're a lower rank, you gain more. Huh.. Doesn't make much sense. Maybe because YOU'RE A LOWER RANK! I can't stand people like you. Don't bitch about the dice. That's not true. They come and go for all. I'm getting rhp in here..

ahahahahahahahaha

[rhp 1]

As someone else mentioned major is easy (2000) using escalating cards alone and skill despite bad dice. I won my first tourney with horrible dice and getting picked on a little bit since i had the highest score and I dominated a second round putting me in 1st place. But now im about ready to quit the site "I am about to leave because the dice are on their rampage again and it pisses me off. Based on the dice analyzer add on out of 446 3v2 attacks Ive only won 31.66% when I should be at 37.17%. Ive only rolled 14.71% of 6's out of 1298 dice throws (which is way fricking low) and I mostly roll 4's 2's 1's 3's 5's in that order...with as much dice as Ive thrown since i last deleted my cookies I should not be off so severely. I know its random, but seriously they need to make it less random and more statistically accurate. Who wants to play a game when they lose 12% more often then normal after nearly 1300 rolls? Or loses 3v2 attacks 15% more than usual after nearly 500 attacks? Yes, frustrating, its why i left the site for a year 2 years ago and Im about ready to leave again for longer than that." So it only gets worse as u get higher up the ranks.

easy JCMS.... that might be a touch more info than this dude can process... and if this is gonna turn into a strictly flame-fest, someone let me know... cause I'm ready... hahahaha

[rhp 1]

Maybe you just suck. Have you considered that?

sayed the guy who obviously sucks, and is looking for followers who obviously believe they suck,

i dont believe i suck,

AOG, you have spelled your clanname wrong,
it should be AOD- ArmyofTok ?

I don't suck.. so I guess you've given me the authority... at your score and win %?.... YOU SUCK... it's really not up for debate bro...
I'm sure there's something in your life that you're good at... it's just not risk... I wouldn't be that upset about it if I were you...

[Woodruff]

you think you're so good, but you're really not, especially if you can't even keep above 1600 easily.

Says the guy currently sitting at 1553. Hell dude, I have a higher score than you do, and I do suck at this game. I don't play it often enough to be any good.

I think the only indicator if someone is good, average or really bad is the percentage of won games, i would say anybody below 10 percent won games up from 200 played games is really bad-

That doesn't make any sense at all, unless you take into account what type of games are being played.

i could be wrong, those with 50 percent wins must be very good, i dont know how they do it

You are wrong, if you're looking at it this simplistically.

[Army of GOD]

in defense of my e-ego, I was at major for a while until I lost interest in this game.

[Gabriel13]

you think you're so good, but you're really not, especially if you can't even keep above 1600 easily.

Says the guy currently sitting at 1553. Hell dude, I have a higher score than you do, and I do suck at this game. I don't play it often enough to be any good.

I think the only indicator if someone is good, average or really bad is the percentage of won games, i would say anybody below 10 percent won games up from 200 played games is really bad-

That doesn't make any sense at all, unless you take into account what type of games are being played.

i could be wrong, those with 50 percent wins must be very good, i dont know how they do it

You are wrong, if you're looking at it this simplistically.

Who the hell has below 10%? Nobody EVER has below 10% unless they're at the very bottom of the list, which is usually lower than 1% of the people..

[Gabriel13]

Maybe you just suck. Have you considered that?

sayed the guy who obviously sucks, and is looking for followers who obviously believe they suck,

i dont believe i suck,

AOG, you have spelled your clanname wrong,
it should be AOD- ArmyofTok ?

How does he suck? You said it mattered on percentage. He has 45%. You have 31%. Obviously, you suck. We're all against you. You're never gonna win..

[AslanTheKing]

Aslan, maybe what you're noticing is just the normal ebb and flow of the game. Sometimes I'm on fire, I just can't stop losing, I mean winning, and then I go through a cold spell where I go for questionable 3v2 clicks and term kill runs when the chances are only 30%. Home run hitters, gamblers, golf players - they all have hot and cold streaks.

its ebb and flow, still sucks big time

Seriously, you can't play very well.. If you really think it's all based off of dice, it's just stupid..

its fine gabriel, i got your message

[Gabriel13]

Aslan, maybe what you're noticing is just the normal ebb and flow of the game. Sometimes I'm on fire, I just can't stop losing, I mean winning, and then I go through a cold spell where I go for questionable 3v2 clicks and term kill runs when the chances are only 30%. Home run hitters, gamblers, golf players - they all have hot and cold streaks.

its ebb and flow, still sucks big time

Seriously, you can't play very well.. If you really think it's all based off of dice, it's just stupid..

its fine gabriel, i got your message

YOU'RE GONNA GET MORE MESSAGES, BECAUSE I JUST REALLY DON'T LIKE YOU!

[AslanTheKing]

I had a tremendous string of rolls earlier this morning, taking down a stack that was around 15-20 troops larger than mine.

But maybe I just proved your point, since I have a score somewhere in the 1400's right now.


--Andy

i remember that u had more points, looks like i not the only one going up and down.

[AslanTheKing]

dude.. you're bent...

says the guy who lives in a village and plays with chicken,
( i have nothing against villages, its just the possibility that chicken are running around is higher then else )

im not bent but i do think those who are belong still to this earth, as long theyre not after children (same with the nonbent ones of course 2)

[AslanTheKing]

Aslan you got it all right! at least in those few words...

i am
an idiot

rest you said makes no sense at all...

1800 higher rank?

to slice words out of the context is poor,
putting words in someones mouth 2, read the whole thing again

[AslanTheKing]

Aslan, maybe what you're noticing is just the normal ebb and flow of the game. Sometimes I'm on fire, I just can't stop losing, I mean winning, and then I go through a cold spell where I go for questionable 3v2 clicks and term kill runs when the chances are only 30%. Home run hitters, gamblers, golf players - they all have hot and cold streaks.

its ebb and flow, still sucks big time

Seriously, you can't play very well.. If you really think it's all based off of dice, it's just stupid..

its fine gabriel, i got your message

YOU'RE GONNA GET MORE MESSAGES, BECAUSE I JUST REALLY DON'T LIKE YOU!

Thats fine with me if u take this to a personal stage, i dont,
but i understand your yealousy, since i am AslanTheKing,
and youre Gabriel ( the woman from the movie Constantin), just showing emotional hormonrelated female outbreaks, its fine,
your monthly period is almost over .

[AslanTheKing]

Maybe you just suck. Have you considered that?

sayed the guy who obviously sucks, and is looking for followers who obviously believe they suck,

i dont believe i suck,

AOG, you have spelled your clanname wrong,
it should be AOD- ArmyofTok ?

How does he suck? You said it mattered on percentage. He has 45%. You have 31%. Obviously, you suck. We're all against you. You're never gonna win..

31 percent is average, not good , not bad, still depends if u play lots 1vs1-than its maybe not soo good, but not bad either,
i am happy with 31 percent, there is potential to go higher, all fine with me

[freakns]

Aslan you got it all right! at least in those few words...

i am
an idiot

rest you said makes no sense at all...

1800 higher rank?

to slice words out of the context is poor,
putting words in someones mouth 2, read the whole thing again

i can read it 1000 times... you have problems getting to 1800 points and calling yourself good even though it takes some serious sucking to get below 1800...

[AslanTheKing]

freakns, i would say i am average, i ve set up 3 classic, escalating games , reserved for u,
if i lose all 3 against u , i will consider myself as bad player who sucks,
if i win only one than i stay in my belief that i am a good average player,
i cant lose, after all i might learn a thing or two from u,
i hope youre in

[AslanTheKing]

freakns, i would say i am average, i ve set up 3 classic, escalating games , reserved for u,
if i lose all 3 against u , i will consider myself as bad player who sucks,
if i win only one than i stay in my belief that i am a good average player,
i cant lose, after all i might learn a thing or two from u,
i hope youre in

i dont play and i dont care about 1 vs 1...
by freakns
on Tue May 29, 2012 4:05 pm

what a shame, would have been easy points for u,
maybe thats the way to have stable 1800 points always, play only doubles, quadruples, or whatever strategy is save, i will try that 2,

anybody is up to play 3 classic games with me, i set them up new, password is yousuck

everybody with points 2000+ is invited =, after all im clueless, i suck, im bad,
so nothing u can lose ( or? )

[AndyDufresne]

freakns, i would say i am average, i ve set up 3 classic, escalating games , reserved for u,
if i lose all 3 against u , i will consider myself as bad player who sucks,
if i win only one than i stay in my belief that i am a good average player,
i cant lose, after all i might learn a thing or two from u,
i hope youre in

Match of the century.


--Andy

[AslanTheKing]

freakns, i would say i am average, i ve set up 3 classic, escalating games , reserved for u,
if i lose all 3 against u , i will consider myself as bad player who sucks,
if i win only one than i stay in my belief that i am a good average player,
i cant lose, after all i might learn a thing or two from u,
i hope youre in

i dont play and i dont care about 1 vs 1...
by freakns
on Tue May 29, 2012 4:05 pm

what a shame, would have been easy points for u,
maybe thats the way to have stable 1800 points always, play only doubles, quadruples, or whatever strategy is save, i will try that 2,

anybody is up to play 3 classic games with me, i set them up new, password is yousuck

everybody with points 2000+ is invited =, after all im clueless, i suck, im bad,
so nothing u can lose ( or? )

[freakns]

you dont need skills to play 1 vs 1 classic game... you need to know how to press attack button... and that much even you can master

[rhp 1]

you think you're so good, but you're really not, especially if you can't even keep above 1600 easily.

Says the guy currently sitting at 1553. Hell dude, I have a higher score than you do, and I do suck at this game. I don't play it often enough to be any good.

I think the only indicator if someone is good, average or really bad is the percentage of won games, i would say anybody below 10 percent won games up from 200 played games is really bad-

That doesn't make any sense at all, unless you take into account what type of games are being played.

i could be wrong, those with 50 percent wins must be very good, i dont know how they do it

You are wrong, if you're looking at it this simplistically.

easy big guy.... Gab would blow your doors off with a crashed com...

[rhp 1]

dude.. you're bent...

says the guy who lives in a village and plays with chicken,
( i have nothing against villages, its just the possibility that chicken are running around is higher then else )

im not bent but i do think those who are belong still to this earth, as long theyre not after children (same with the nonbent ones of course 2)

ok... so this is obviously just to get the community jigged up.. that's cool.. have fun with that...

and I don't even under understand your random rantings about chickens and villages... I hope you thought it was funny at least...