Bones2484 wrote:Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?
Actually it was last February in
this thread.
You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.
Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.
Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.
Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.
Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.
Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.
It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!
Bones, fruitycakes and myself have been at war for years now, I never denied I said it, I was trying to make a point to him was all off him bragging about his relative rank, I honestly don't care what he does, it was more me at war with him and showing him and others how he did it. We have been at war for years with each other, it is nothing new.
It all had to do with his relative rank and him bragging about it over a year ago, I just showed how he got it so good was all, at that time, like I said, it is within the rules. Just funny how he had to revert to that when he had around a 2800 to 3000 score. fruitcakes was trying to fit in and be viewed as a great player and was trying too hard because many did not see him as this at that time, so he was over flating himself. He did not play many high rankers, I have, I also have played and still playing in tournaments, and clan challenges, and clan cups against solid competition, and mod games, etc. This is really stupid to argue over guys.
It had nothing to do with conqueror or being so close to conqueror which is a different animal, when you reach this high in score, like I said it is quite common tactic for players to do, you do not have much of a choice, unless you want to me to try to exploit other ways, which I will not do, because they are more shady. In all the ways to achieve conqueror status, the way I am doing it is the most reasonable, compared to other ways it was or could be achieved. Again, this is my opinion. My point is, trying to maintain around a 3000 score and high relative rank for fruitcake raises an eyebrow and it is not the same as 4500 to 5000 score which is 100x harder and more challenging to achieve, it is an extremely difficult feat to accomplish. Anyone over 3500 score knows how hard it is to maintain that, and 4000 score it becomes so much harder, then 4500 way harder, and 5000 score, just becomes near impossible. So, look at the conqueror's thread and look how they all achieved getting there? I already met conqueror so it does not matter to me if I get it again or not, but was fun trying, it is quite a difficult feat to accomplish.
I think only 20 players have ever made conqueror out of around 400,000 or half million players that have came through and played on the cc site, so, this is what you should compare conqueror's to, other conquerors, not a colonel or brig's with high relative rank, they are simply not the same. Compare field marshalls with field marshall and conqueror's with conquerors, this is a more fair comparison. There is only few and far between.
good luck!
