Moderator: Community Team
ManBungalow wrote:I could probably tell you if I understood what you mean by 1/5 ...
ManBungalow wrote:I could probably tell you if I understood what you mean by 1/5 ...
Funkyterrance wrote:I don't think the odds are that astounding tbh...
Maybe the equivalent of winning on a scratch ticket?
Also, we really need to have exact numbers to be able to give a definitive answer.
lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I don't think the odds are that astounding tbh...
Maybe the equivalent of winning on a scratch ticket?
Also, we really need to have exact numbers to be able to give a definitive answer.
Why not just admit that math ain't your cup of tea?![]()
Funkyterrance wrote:lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I don't think the odds are that astounding tbh...
Maybe the equivalent of winning on a scratch ticket?
Also, we really need to have exact numbers to be able to give a definitive answer.
Why not just admit that math ain't your cup of tea?![]()
Lolz.![]()
Ok, just as long as you'll admit that English isn't yours.
But seriously, a one in 5 chance? That doesn't seem that odd...
If you flipped a coin 25 times and it came up tails roughly five times would you be like: "HOLY SHIT, THIS IS INSANE!!!" ?
lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I don't think the odds are that astounding tbh...
Maybe the equivalent of winning on a scratch ticket?
Also, we really need to have exact numbers to be able to give a definitive answer.
Why not just admit that math ain't your cup of tea?![]()
Evil Semp wrote:lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:I don't think the odds are that astounding tbh...
Maybe the equivalent of winning on a scratch ticket?
Also, we really need to have exact numbers to be able to give a definitive answer.
Why not just admit that math ain't your cup of tea?![]()
He sounds like he is willing to do the math it just sounds like you have trouble counting past 5 without using your toes. You want others to agree with you but you just want them to have faith in what you say. Give them some proof.
Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Funkyterrance wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Did you know that physically speaking, if you threw a tennis ball against a concrete wall 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times, there is a small chance that the ball could pass right through the wall one of those times?
It's Science!
Funkyterrance wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Did you know that physically speaking, if you threw a tennis ball against a concrete wall 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times, there is a small chance that the ball could pass right through the wall one of those times?
It's Science!
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Did you know that physically speaking, if you threw a tennis ball against a concrete wall 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times, there is a small chance that the ball could pass right through the wall one of those times?
It's Science!
I'd say the tennis ball would get destroyed long before. Sometimes science sounds like a story from the bible. Joshua fit the battle of Jericho. And who was the harlot Rahab?
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
kentington wrote:
How many units of Cuil are you using to calculate that?
Funkyterrance wrote:kentington wrote:
How many units of Cuil are you using to calculate that?
Only one, if you can believe that? I am also a subscriber to Rene Descartes's Dream argument.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
kentington wrote:
I recently saw a video on PBS or KOCE or some public network. It was talking about Quantum Physics and talking about the chances of you walking through a wall into another dimension or something and you are in a bar and order orange juice and there is a chance that it is blue. Basically, the further you get the less specific your predictions can be. You can predict that it will most likely be a liquid but not what type it will be. Then further out you can predict that it might be consumable.
Funkyterrance wrote:kentington wrote:
I recently saw a video on PBS or KOCE or some public network. It was talking about Quantum Physics and talking about the chances of you walking through a wall into another dimension or something and you are in a bar and order orange juice and there is a chance that it is blue. Basically, the further you get the less specific your predictions can be. You can predict that it will most likely be a liquid but not what type it will be. Then further out you can predict that it might be consumable.
Awesomeness.
kentington wrote:lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Did you know that physically speaking, if you threw a tennis ball against a concrete wall 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times, there is a small chance that the ball could pass right through the wall one of those times?
It's Science!
I'd say the tennis ball would get destroyed long before. Sometimes science sounds like a story from the bible. Joshua fit the battle of Jericho. And who was the harlot Rahab?
If you want to mock the Bible, then please use coherent sentences, better grammar and correct words (fit/fought). It will help you sound like you know that you are actually comparing science and religion. When you say they are both stories but use incorrect words and incomplete sentences we may have a hard time taking you seriously, even when you are joking.
mviola wrote:kentington wrote:lt.Futt wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:
-Sully
Did you know that physically speaking, if you threw a tennis ball against a concrete wall 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times, there is a small chance that the ball could pass right through the wall one of those times?
It's Science!
I'd say the tennis ball would get destroyed long before. Sometimes science sounds like a story from the bible. Joshua fit the battle of Jericho. And who was the harlot Rahab?
If you want to mock the Bible, then please use coherent sentences, better grammar and correct words (fit/fought). It will help you sound like you know that you are actually comparing science and religion. When you say they are both stories but use incorrect words and incomplete sentences we may have a hard time taking you seriously, even when you are joking.
Look at the country his profile says.
You might want to try that last response again.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
kentington wrote:lt.Futt, sorry about that. I was out of line, even if he was a native English speaker.
Timminz wrote:Dear it.futt,
I have inspected your previous 28 1v1 matches, and it appears that your case in terminal. Your having only managed to go first in five of those 28 matches, has made it apparent that you should just quit now. It doesn't get any better from here.
Sincerely,
A concerned member of the CC public
Evil Semp wrote:He sounds like he is willing to do the math it just sounds like you have trouble counting past 5 without using your toes. You want others to agree with you but you just want them to have faith in what you say. Give them some proof.
lt.Futt wrote:for being second in order 1/5 in my recent 25-30 1v1 speed games?
Timminz wrote:Dear it.futt,
I have inspected your previous 28 1v1 matches that your case in terminal. Your having only managed to go first in five of those 28 matches
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users