Conquer Club

New COlours

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

New COlours

Postby zunzee on Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:31 pm

I am just wondering, before posting in the suggesion section, that is it just me, or that with the new colours added, there are too many "warm" colours in play now?

With the new colours, warm colours officially include orange, red, pink, maganta, and yellow. Wouldn't it make much more sense if Lack put in a darker and cooler colour, such as dark purple instead of the maganta? I now there is now a colour code system, but I find that annoying. Anyway, to the point: does anyone feel that the new colours are too close to each other? and that they should add darker and, icier, and cooler colours in? or is it just me?
User avatar
Private 1st Class zunzee
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:52 pm

Postby JesusReigns on Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:35 pm

I believe the 2 reds are to close together in color I had a hard time tell them appart. Use the add colour thingy and it will tell you the first letter of what colour it is
127 JesusReigns 2700 2598 1407 (54%) Colonel Colonel 4.8 United States United States
User avatar
Captain JesusReigns
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:58 pm

Postby firth4eva on Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:36 pm

I believe your sig is too big.
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby zunzee on Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:40 pm

JesusReigns wrote:I believe the 2 reds are to close together in color I had a hard time tell them appart. Use the add colour thingy and it will tell you the first letter of what colour it is


i believe that this was why the colour system thingy was added, but u can't rely on the letter infront of the number to tell the armies apart and devise plans. It's just simply so much easier and clearer to get an image of the entire situation with colour coding!
User avatar
Private 1st Class zunzee
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:52 pm

Postby JesusReigns on Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:44 pm

lol so do I my sig is way to big. I'm working on making it smaller.
127 JesusReigns 2700 2598 1407 (54%) Colonel Colonel 4.8 United States United States
User avatar
Captain JesusReigns
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:58 pm

Postby oVo on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:37 pm

I'm kind fo hopeful that a better color solution is lurking around the corner. Much like the new missed turn multiplier concept, somebody will devise a color scheme that makes the eight hues easier to distinguish.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Postby wicked on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:45 pm

You spelled color wrong. :wink:
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby Blitzaholic on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:51 pm

BLACK would be nice
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby rebelman on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:53 pm

wicked wrote:You spelled color wrong. :wink:


wiki you can't spell (like most yanks)

it's colour

the other wiki on the net wrote:-our, -or

Most words ending in unstressed -our in the United Kingdom (e.g. colour, flavour, honour, armour) end in -or in the U.S. (e.g. color, flavor, honor, armor). (Where the vowel is unreduced, this does not occur: contour, paramour, troubadour, are thus spelled everywhere.) Most words of this category derive from Latin non-agent nouns having nominative -or; the first such borrowings into English were from early Old French and the ending was -or or -ur.[17] After the Norman Conquest, the termination became -our in Anglo-French in an attempt to represent the Old French pronunciation of words ending in -or.[18] The -our ending was not only retained in English borrowings from Anglo-French, but also applied to earlier French borrowings.[19] After the Renaissance, some such borrowings from Latin were taken up with their original -or termination; many words once ending in -our (for example, chancellour and governour) now end in -or everywhere. Many words of the -our/-or group do not have a Latin counterpart; for example, armo(u)r, behavio(u)r, harbo(u)r, neighbo(u)r; also arbo(u)r meaning "shelter", though senses "tree" and "tool" are always arbor, a false cognate of the other word. Some 16th and early 17th century British scholars indeed insisted that -or be used for words of Latin origin and -our for French loans; but in many cases the etymology was not completely clear, and therefore some scholars advocated -or only and others -our only.[20]

Webster's 1828 dictionary featured only -or and is generally given much of the credit for the adoption of this form in the U.S. By contrast, Dr Johnson's 1755 dictionary used the -our spelling for all words still so spelled in Britain, as well as for emperour, errour, governour, horrour, tenour, terrour, and tremour, where the u has since been dropped. Johnson, unlike Webster, was not an advocate of spelling reform and for the most part simply recorded what he found. For example, documents [2] from the Old Bailey, the foremost court in London, support the view of the OED that by the 17th century "colour" was the settled spelling. Those English speakers who began to move across the Atlantic would have taken these habits with them and H L Mencken makes the point that, "honor appears in the Declaration of Independence, but it seems to have got there rather by accident than by design. In Jefferson’s original draft it is spelled honour. " [3] Examples such as color, flavor, behavior, harbor, or neighbor scarcely appear in the Old Bailey's court records from the 17th and 18th century, whereas examples of their -our counterparts are generally numbered in hundreds. One notable exception is honor: honor and honour were equally frequent down to the 17th century,[21] Honor still is, in the UK, the normal spelling as a person's name.

Derivatives and inflected forms. In derivatives and inflected forms of the -our/or words, in British usage the u is kept before English suffixes that are freely attachable to English words (neighbourhood, humourless, savoury) and suffixes of Greek or Latin origin that have been naturalised (favourite, honourable, behaviourism); before Latin suffixes that are not freely attachable to English words, the u can be dropped (honorific, honorist, vigorous, humorous, laborious, invigorate), can be either dropped or retained (colo(u)ration, colo(u)rise), or can be retained (colourist).[22] In American usage, derivatives and inflected forms are built by simply adding the suffix in all environments (favorite, savory, etc.) since the u is absent to begin with.

Exceptions. American usage in most cases retains the u in the word glamour, which comes from Scots, not Latin or French; saviour is a common variant of savior in the U.S.. The British spelling is very common for "honour" (and "favour") on wedding invitations in the United States.[23] The Space Shuttle Endeavour has a u as it is named after Captain Cook's ship, HMS Endeavour.

The name of the herb savory is thus spelled everywhere, although the probably related adjective savo(u)ry, like savour, has a u in the UK. Honor (the name) and arbor (the tool) have -or in Britain, as mentioned above. As a general noun, rigour (IPA: /ˈrɪgə(ɹ)/) has a u in the UK; the medical term rigor (often IPA: /ˈraɪgɔː(ɹ)/) does not.

Commonwealth usage. Commonwealth countries normally follow British usage. In Canada -or endings are not uncommon, particularly in the Prairie Provinces, though they are rarer in Eastern Canada.[24] In Australia, -or terminations enjoyed some use in the 19th century, and now are sporadically found in some regions,[25] usually in local and regional newspapers, though -our is almost universal. The name of the Australian Labor Party, founded in 1891, is a remnant of this trend.
Last edited by rebelman on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
User avatar
Private rebelman
 
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: People's Republic of Cork

Postby happy2seeyou on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:54 pm

Rebs and your quoting skills suck ;)
User avatar
Captain happy2seeyou
 
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: A state that is in the shape of a mitten!

Postby Blitzaholic on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:55 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:Rebs and your quoting skills suck ;)


:lol:
Image
User avatar
General Blitzaholic
 
Posts: 23050
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Apocalyptic Area

Postby michiganfan22 on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:55 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:BLACK would be nice
Image
Lieutenant michiganfan22
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:34 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby rebelman on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:56 pm

happy2seeyou wrote:Rebs and your quoting skills suck ;)


:shock:
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
User avatar
Private rebelman
 
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: People's Republic of Cork

Postby RiskTycoon on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:56 pm

not only that but he is wrong ...either spelling is correct ...don't care how you try to slice it...either way is perfectly acceptable ! so all that quoting and posting was for nothing!
"How do you like that? Even among misfits you're a misfit!"
User avatar
Major RiskTycoon
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Postby RiskTycoon on Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:58 pm

black would be too hard to see unless you change the little bubble the #s go in to a nice shade of light gray...really really light gray !
"How do you like that? Even among misfits you're a misfit!"
User avatar
Major RiskTycoon
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Postby TheTeacher on Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:33 pm

my oppinion: orange, red, and pink r too close together. Pink doesn't work well at all, no mater how i adjust my monitor, pink always ends up looking like red or like white or red, pink and white all can't be told apart. Instead, u could try a light green collor, and make the current green color darker, to make the colors clearer. The Orange is too close to red, try a lighter, more yellowish orange.

Instead of:

Dark Red
Green
Dark Blue
Yellow
Light Blue/Teal
Light Red/Pink
Dark Reddish Orange
Dark Purple/Violet

try:

Dark Red
Dark Green
Dark Blue
Yellow
Light Blue/Teal
Light Green/Yellow-Green
More Yellowish Orange
Dark Purple/Violet

Anyhow, the color codes are great and all, but just for those folks who do like telling things apart by color... the current color selection just seems to tend to go to the red end of the color/colour circle/wheel too much.
Captain TheTeacher
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:12 pm

Postby Iliad on Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:22 am

wicked wrote:You spelled color wrong. :wink:
don't start this
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: New COlours

Postby billy07 on Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:51 am

zunzee wrote:I am just wondering, before posting in the suggesion section, that is it just me, or that with the new colours added, there are too many "warm" colours in play now?

With the new colours, warm colours officially include orange, red, pink, maganta, and yellow. Wouldn't it make much more sense if Lack put in a darker and cooler colour, such as dark purple instead of the maganta? I now there is now a colour code system, but I find that annoying. Anyway, to the point: does anyone feel that the new colours are too close to each other? and that they should add darker and, icier, and cooler colours in? or is it just me?
how about tartan?
Click image to enlarge.
image
Sergeant 1st Class billy07
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:18 am
Location: China, a beautiful country full of wonderful people

Re: New COlours

Postby rebelman on Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:01 am

zunzee wrote:I am just wondering, before posting in the suggesion section, that is it just me, or that with the new colours added, there are too many "warm" colours in play now?

With the new colours, warm colours officially include orange, red, pink, maganta, and yellow. Wouldn't it make much more sense if Lack put in a darker and cooler colour, such as dark purple instead of the maganta? I now there is now a colour code system, but I find that annoying. Anyway, to the point: does anyone feel that the new colours are too close to each other? and that they should add darker and, icier, and cooler colours in? or is it just me?


i'm not colour blind but i can't tell the difference between orange and red
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
User avatar
Private rebelman
 
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: People's Republic of Cork

Postby wicked on Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:50 pm

The suggestion thread for this topic is here:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37215

If you want your comment considered, please post there^.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby mommytozoe on Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:53 am

i think the colors are too close together its hard sometimes on certain maps to tell the difference
*~Kita~*
Cadet mommytozoe
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:44 am
Location: USA

Postby Dodo C. Snotts on Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:01 am

I am all for major primary colors, here... more like the original board, IMHO... (of course, they are possibly being avoided because they may turn out hard to see, I don't know)

red
orange
yellow
green
blue
viloet
gray
black
white
User avatar
Private Dodo C. Snotts
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:46 am
Location: Texas


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users