Moderator: Community Team
s.xkitten wrote:or maybe people should realize that no matter what happens, lack will never be able to please everyone.
So take what you get, and shut up, he does enough work on this site, without having to wade through your whining
codeblue1018 wrote:s.xkitten wrote:or maybe people should realize that no matter what happens, lack will never be able to please everyone.
So take what you get, and shut up, he does enough work on this site, without having to wade through your whining
And then you have players like s.xkitten who post nothing but crap. Apparently we can't voice an opinion on this site or you may offend some1. SIGH! Nonetheless, taking a look at your great record, I can now see why. Pointless! FYI, Lack, you do a fine fine job on this site. Sometimes, there are things that need additional components, it's not that your being bashed.
Find something else to do with your time Kitten. This isn't flame wars. It's a discussion on how to make this site even more appealing for all those who enjoy it.
codeblue1018 wrote:The concept of the speed game is just that, SPEED! If you can't finish a player off in the time allowed, 5 minutes, then you must use your head, think of a game plan for next turn and see what happens. Takes the all the fun out of the speed concept.
And hence the vote. If most people are for increasing the amount of time, then it'll happen, as it did. I think it's just another part of the game to consider, and you can't bring sequential escalating tactics into a speed game and expect the same rules to apply. Different game styles, different strategies. A lot of people didn't want to change their strategies, so now we have extended turns.insomniacdude wrote:codeblue1018 wrote:The concept of the speed game is just that, SPEED! If you can't finish a player off in the time allowed, 5 minutes, then you must use your head, think of a game plan for next turn and see what happens. Takes the all the fun out of the speed concept.
This is similar to the argument against changing Freestyle. People who are against the changes think that time should be factored as part of strategy.
I think it shouldn't ever have to be seriously considered.
Difference of opinions. It's just the difference between "5 minutes is enough" and "5 minutes is not enough" was too big for lack to ignore.
oVo wrote:s.xkitten is dead on, if you don't like the speed game parameters? Don't join them. codeblue you can't have your cake and eat it too. Apparently s.xkitten can't voice an opinion without catching shit from you because... um... well, nobody can state a point of view that differs from your own without feeling the sting of your rebuttal.
On the other hand, I agree with you that a speed game's five minute rounds are plenty of time and all players should plan their moves with that in mind. Granting additional time as a conquerer's priviledge --to organize their recent aquisitions-- seems to go against the spirit of the speed game.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users