Conquer Club

coverup scandle in CC?

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Sound like a coverup?

 
Total votes : 0

coverup scandle in CC?

Postby Ishmael_yoder on Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:58 am

The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.
Sergeant 1st Class Ishmael_yoder
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:23 pm

Postby cena-rules on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:00 am

:lol:

Im guessing he is on your ignore list

take him off your ignore list and look again

you will be suprised
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Re: coverup scandle in CC?

Postby chessplaya on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:00 am

Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.


lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Re: coverup scandle in CC?

Postby cena-rules on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:01 am

chessplaya wrote:
Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.


lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now


fatsposted
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby chessplaya on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:02 am

damn u cena rules :lol:
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby cena-rules on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:02 am

chessplaya wrote:damn u cena rules :lol:


you love me really :wink:
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Postby chessplaya on Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:03 am

cena-rules wrote:
chessplaya wrote:damn u cena rules :lol:


you love me really :wink:


i do but lets stop spamming :wink:
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby wicked on Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:42 am

Ishmael, You can edit your feedback for this player so that it strictly speaks to gameplay, and not his feedback for you (which is retaliatory). When you are done with the edit, send another note to etix so we can review it for suitability for re-posting.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby Ishmael_yoder on Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:02 am

I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).
Sergeant 1st Class Ishmael_yoder
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:23 pm

Postby Visaoni on Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:07 am

Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).


It sounds fine to me. Personally I would have let the original pass. People should be warned when some idiot is going to go into all their go ballistic in game chat, and all the chat of all their active games, and then leave a neg for it. Although I do see how it could be considered retaliatory I still think it is a valid warning.
Sergeant Visaoni
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:44 pm

Postby AAFitz on Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:14 am

I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle

but as far as the feedback goes, just modify it as Wicked suggests, if you think its warranted. Refer to his game play and chat in that game, if you feel its unsportsmanlike.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Postby wicked on Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:48 pm

Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.

here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."

is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).


Typically any mention of feedback left deems it retaliatory.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby wicked on Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:50 pm

AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle


That's SO last year. This year's is Clapper-Bedub-Wicked. What do you think we're doing in chat all that time? :wink: I bet you wear last year's fashion's too, eh? :lol:
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby oVo on Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:53 pm

Remove him from your ignore list to see his participation in the chat
and them re-ignore him when you are finished.

so who get's the biggest slice of pie in a love triangle?
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Postby gimil on Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:04 pm

oVo wrote:Remove him from your ignore list to see his participation in the chat
and them re-ignore him when you are finished.

so who get's the biggest slice of pie in a love triangle?


im guessing clapper, wicked just aint up to it like she used to.

ever since hte penis reduction
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby Twill on Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:13 pm

Awww, I was hoping this was going to be a REAL coverup.

To the Original Poster: what wicked said

To everyone else, while I love a good love triangle as much as the next, keep it on topic if ya would, or start up your own love triangle debate thread in the clubhouse to see who gets the biggest slice ;)
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Twill
 
Posts: 3630
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:54 pm

Re: coverup scandle in CC?

Postby Scott-Land on Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:26 pm

chessplaya wrote:
Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.

I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.


lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now



must be the same cover up involving Chessplaya- i can't see any of his [team] chat
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Postby Iliad on Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:42 am

AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle

but as far as the feedback goes, just modify it as Wicked suggests, if you think its warranted. Refer to his game play and chat in that game, if you feel its unsportsmanlike.

I'm quite sure it was a square AK_Iceman-wicked-lack-twill
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users