Moderator: Community Team
Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.
I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.
chessplaya wrote:Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.
I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.
lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now
cena-rules wrote:chessplaya wrote:damn u cena rules
you love me really
Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.
here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."
is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).
Ishmael_yoder wrote:I see, I did not realize past communication in past games dissapeared with the ignore list, good to know.
here is the feedback that was deleted:
"Accused a player in our game of cheating because two people used a truce, then went into all his active games, calling him a cheater, then left Neg feedback, avoid this guy."
is it considered retaliatory because just because I mentioned the Neg. feedback? If that was left out, would it pass? I think others should be warned about people who do what Risko does (accuse others of cheating over a truce and try to ruin a guys name due to a truce).
AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle
oVo wrote:Remove him from your ignore list to see his participation in the chat
and them re-ignore him when you are finished.
so who get's the biggest slice of pie in a love triangle?
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
chessplaya wrote:Ishmael_yoder wrote:The following is a message I have left with the admins via the help section , just for everyones reading enjoyment. I find the situation very interesting.
I have just received notice that one of my feedbacks was deleted because it was "Responding to a feedback left for another player" Here is the situation: thefirm and gazza trot made a truce, anounced it in the game and it gave them the advantage. It was appropriate and part of the game. Risko lost the most out of the deal and went balistic. He accused them of cheating, went into all of thefirm's active games and told them they he was a cheater, giving our game number as the proof, attempting to ruin his name for having a truce. Risko was eliminated first and had the first opportunity to place feedback, therefore thefirm's feedback reguarding this was deleted as retaliatory.
What is the approriate way to warn people about players like Risko, I thought it was thru feedback, so I left him a negative feedback, but evidently that is not the appropriate way to warn others because you deleted my feedback left for him.
Here is the most disturbing part of the situation: I went back to look at the game log(1056251) to remind myself exactly what was said, and presto all of Risko's communication is gone. How is that possible, what is the point of that? Other people should be warned of his conduct, and someone is working hard to cover it up, I don't get it.
lol his chat is gone because he is on ur ignore list now
AAFitz wrote:I was so hoping this was going to be about the coverup of the Lack-Wicked-Twill Love Triangle
but as far as the feedback goes, just modify it as Wicked suggests, if you think its warranted. Refer to his game play and chat in that game, if you feel its unsportsmanlike.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users