Do they ever actually answer questions around here?

by **KraphtOne** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:04 pm

Why are dice against the neutral player perfectly random...

And Dice against other opponents so perfectly un-random?

For those of you that never understand the complaints around here; the top image is what random dice actually look like. The bottom image is what people are complaining about...

by **owenshooter** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:21 pm

KraphtOne wrote:

WAIT!!! i get it!!! is this a thread on dice?!!! SWEET!!!-Jésus noir

by **KraphtOne** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:22 pm

ha ha yeah cause dice threads are stupid, people should just shut up

you do the same thing that they do... roll your eyes and don't look at facts...

by **owenshooter** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:23 pm

KraphtOne wrote:ha ha yeah cause dice threads are stupid, people should just shut up

i never said that!! i actually like your dice threads!!! still waiting for an answer on one of them... hell, i didn't know we had gone away from Random.org until recently!!! anyway... rage on!!!-Jésus noir

by **KraphtOne** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:24 pm

owenshooter wrote:
KraphtOne wrote:ha ha yeah cause dice threads are stupid, people should just shut up

i never said that!! i actually like your dice threads!!! still waiting for an answer on one of them... hell, i didn't know we had gone away from Random.org until recently!!! anyway... rage on!!!-Jésus noir

ok back to friends again

by **Metsfanmax** on Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:46 pm

Actually, that is pretty weird. My bet is that this has to do with the way the dice stats were recorded. (In particular, in relation to the time period of the flawed dice distribution that has been documented in other threads. Here's a possible scenario: you have done the vast majority of your attacks against neutral players since that flaw was fixed, but a significant component of your attacks overall occurred while the flaw was live.) Were rolls against the neutral player always recorded?