JUSTIFICATION

by **General Alertus** on Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:49 pm

How can you possibly justify a neutral area winning against a 9 troop attack..That is absolute wrong and bias against non payers..would it happen against those who pay to play..I think not..Personally I think since the % roll changes the game has become a negative for those who cannot pay to play and the right thing to do would have been pay to play vs pay to play in matchs only, and non payers vs non payers only...Money has ruined this game for non payers.

by **nietzsche** on Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:56 pm

Alright. This has stopped being funny. Give golden Icons to freemiums.

by **Jippd** on Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:53 pm

General Alertus wrote:How can you possibly justify a neutral area winning against a 9 troop attack..That is absolute wrong and bias against non payers..would it happen against those who pay to play..I think not..Personally I think since the % roll changes the game has become a negative for those who cannot pay to play and the right thing to do would have been pay to play vs pay to play in matchs only, and non payers vs non payers only...Money has ruined this game for non payers.

You are ridiculous. Dice are randomly generated has nothing to do with paying or not.

by **SaMejoHn** on Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:07 pm

he's right! i remember when i first started playing my dice were sooo bad..but as soon as i payed for my membership. Ive never lost an assault when i had more than a 4 troop advantage. I laugh at all those freemiums with their shit dice because i roll sixes all the time!

by **Funkyterrance** on Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:27 pm

Just add him to the pile and let's move on, shall we?

by **General Alertus** on Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:18 pm

Such an cartoons reponse.

by **deathcomesrippin** on Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:03 pm

General Alertus wrote:Such an cartoons reponse.

Make sense, damn you man!!!

by **Agent 86** on Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:07 pm

Yes I demand justification for non-premiums, just look at these stats..just terrible ](*,)

by **Funkyterrance** on Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:14 pm

Can we please merge all of the dice complaint threads ever made? I think it would be an interesting sociological compilation and no doubt if a dice complainer read it he/she might realize that every possible permutation of dice complaint has been created already and they can just search the thread and quote one to save themselves time and effort.

by **macbone** on Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:45 pm

So was this 9v3? That attack wins 94.7% of the time, but there's a 1 in 20 chance of losing that roll, OP.

I had a game the other day when I was rolling 14 v a neutral 2 for a card. I lost 6 troops killing that little neutral 2 (and really, I should have stopped after about 3). It's all part of the game, man, and as Agent pointed out, your dice are actually slightly better than average right now. The longer you play, the more they'll average out.