I have 7 negative feedbacks on my name. 6 of them merit no respect. The 7th came from when I was a noob at the time and did not know better.
I find that, especially in games I win, people tell me I "play like a moron" and "don't have a strategy for winning." I find these comments pointless and unnecessarily rude. I have also found that retaliatory feedback is a problem of massive proportions. When I leave someone negative feedback for a good reason, I have a new one on my name filled with falsified allegations- simply because I gave them negative feedback for a GOOD reason.
I respectfully ask you all to thoroughly consider any feedback, positive, neutral, or negative, before you post. Granted, I probably have thrown around too many positives to attempt to eliminate hard feelings on games I won or in which I trash-talked, but as of now I put a stop to that and ask you all to do the same.
I would like here to post another request as well, and that is that I ask those who have given me negative feedback to reconsider it. As I have said, 6 of my 7 merit no respect at all, and I will here post those which offended me the most with their falsities (Names will be excluded; you know who you are):
"Not the best player here (the most idiotic i've played). Has no concept of how the game should be played. Attacks randomly with no strategy. I would avoid this player if you understand risk. This player will ruin a good game."
This is the most ridiculous type of negative feedback and should never be posted on anybody's name for any reason. Simply because one's strategy does not bludgeon you over the head, or if it fails, does not mean it doesn't exist. Strategies succeed and fail, that is how we learn.
"he was annoyin and kept accusing me of cheating just coz i was beating him and i was unranked. What kind of guy are you ???"
This was retaliatory feedback for this:
"I would not advise playing with him. The whole game he was so busy attacking me he failed to notice Green's control of Asia, which unfairly effected the outcome of the game."
"Unfairly effected" does not mean cheating, no matter how you choose to pervert it. Strategy relies on a certain degree of what is called "knowing what the hell your enemies are doing." If anyone controls Asia, Oceania, and most of Europe, you don't attack someone with a small outpost in SOUTH AMERICA!
"You do play like a moron, too drag out a game with no solid plan for victory yopurself makes you a pain in the backside to play against. May I never sit at a table with youy again."
I believe my lack of a "solid plan" is evidenced by my victory in that game, yes?
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=241514
It just occurred to me tat not posting the names is unimportant as you can find them in my profile. I don't feel like going back and editing it.
My point is, if you leave negative feedback, have a reason- a damn good one. when 7 negatives to 25 positives is considered a lot, obviously negative feedback holds incredible power and should be handled with responsibility.
I believe I have made my point, good day.
