Twill wrote:Guys, chill.
Dayalsoap, for the record, that should have been neutral feedback, not negative. Your opponent's non-chatter did not negatively effect you, even if it did not add to your playing experience, thus you can't say it deserves negative feedback.
Twill I disagree.
I think this feedback was excessive and dumb... but I don't think this player has no right to leave it as a negative.
According to the feedback rules page...
Feedback Guidelines
Leave only fair and factual comments that relate to a specific game.
Do not leave feedback for trivial things like missing an occasional turn.
Do not use foul language.
Do not fish for feedback (i.e. leave positive feedback to get positive feedback in return).
Do not leave retaliatory feedback (i.e. leave negative feedback in revenge of negative feedback).
===
This feedback met that criteria.
The only possible criteria it failed to meet was # 2.
i.e. was this Trivial or not.
My SUBJECTIVE opinion is it was a trivial reason to leave a negative feedback. Most people on here would also agree it was trivial.
This however is a SUBJECTIVE matter... it seems trivial to us... but it's obviously not trivial to the gentleman <sarcasm> leaving the feedback. By definition... if it was trivial he would not have bothered to take the time to leave it.
Now... if it is up to the Moderators to determine what is or is not defined as "trivial"... then so be it. I thought feedback moderators only made decisions based on facts and factual comments.
At the end of the day... I think that CC should leave feedback like this.
As one earlier poster said... this type of feedback says more about the person leaving it than the person receiving it.