Moderator: Community Team
wicked wrote:agreed, I'm scum. vote wicked.
Dariune wrote:Who said thaf > if i dont (f*ck SAKE!!!) go soon shi gfonna get in troubl with Jen. Teehee
I not drunk im tipsy and my key board is shite thats akl
rebelman wrote:I would issue the following warnings though to anyone heading in that direction for the first time:
The thread author could/ will bite your head off especially if the map has been quenched or is in final forge.
They (wrongly) expect everyone to read every post in their threads before you comment - their are ideas being discussed to address this issue but so far they have not ben generally implemented.
In general they like praise but even though they ask for criticism they really don't want it.
Many assume they are right even when they are wrong and will still be slow to admit it.
from experience they really don't like when you tell them their maps are hard to read and/or colours clash.
The further they are in the process the harder it is to get them to change.
The use far to much jargon in general (possibly to scare off us lay people)
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Maybe this is just me, but when I first joined CC I was naturally interested in the map-making process. My first 2 games I joined were on radically different maps, (Crossword and KOTM), and after playing regular Risk for many years, my first thought was, "Who on earth makes these ridiculous maps?" So I headed to the Foundry. I don't post much on other people's maps, (I usually keep my weird ideas to myself), but I've started three Map Ideas threads so far. As long as you take some suggestions, and give a good reason for every suggestion you don't take, you should be fine. Good spelling and grammar helps, too.rebelman wrote:I would issue the following warnings though to anyone heading in that direction for the first time:
The thread author could/ will bite your head off especially if the map has been quenched or is in final forge.
They (wrongly) expect everyone to read every post in their threads before you comment - their are ideas being discussed to address this issue but so far they have not ben generally implemented.
In general they like praise but even though they ask for criticism they really don't want it.
Many assume they are right even when they are wrong and will still be slow to admit it.
from experience they really don't like when you tell them their maps are hard to read and/or colours clash.
The further they are in the process the harder it is to get them to change.
The use far to much jargon in general (possibly to scare off us lay people)
It's opinions and generalities like this that make people hesitant to post there in the first place. Sure, some map makers are like this, but I really hate this kind of stereotyping. Many map makers, (including me, even though I haven't quenched any yet), aren't anything like this.
My Chess map suffered the strange fate of 'nobody having any real issues with the idea', thus making people post less, and the thread eventually degraded into an argument about XML and fell into inactivity. This is partially due to the fact that the mods are only human and don't have the time to look at every map, but it's mostly because people don't post enough in Map Ideas. I don't think I got a single complaint about the idea itself... most of the suggestions were concerning graphics. Since my map preferences are rather weird, (I loved Crossword and disliked KOTM), having other 'normal' people posting in my topics is really helpful in giving my map more mass appeal. It's like voting for President; you shouldn't complain about W if you chose to not vote in the last election. Similarly, nobody who doesn't post in the Foundry should complain about the maps.
rebelman wrote:
Foundry Discussion 72 posts
Final Forge 233 posts (some of these would have been made elsewhere prior to thread reaching ff)
Map ideas 34 posts
Map Foundry 25 posts
so in total I have posted 364 times in the foundry since I joined this site in August 2007.
DiM wrote:rebelman wrote:
Foundry Discussion 72 posts
Final Forge 233 posts (some of these would have been made elsewhere prior to thread reaching ff)
Map ideas 34 posts
Map Foundry 25 posts
so in total I have posted 364 times in the foundry since I joined this site in August 2007.
i have
Foundry Discussion 646 posts
Final Forge 1962 posts (some of these would have been made elsewhere prior to thread reaching ff)
Map ideas 411 posts
Map Foundry 460 posts
total 3479.
i OWN you![]()
![]()
rebelman wrote:DiM wrote:rebelman wrote:
Foundry Discussion 72 posts
Final Forge 233 posts (some of these would have been made elsewhere prior to thread reaching ff)
Map ideas 34 posts
Map Foundry 25 posts
so in total I have posted 364 times in the foundry since I joined this site in August 2007.
i have
Foundry Discussion 646 posts
Final Forge 1962 posts (some of these would have been made elsewhere prior to thread reaching ff)
Map ideas 411 posts
Map Foundry 460 posts
total 3479.
i OWN you![]()
![]()
didn't realise you were a non map maker too here's me thinking you are the "brains" behind several maps including at least 3 in live play, I must have been mistaken
DiM wrote:
clearly mistaken. i no nothing about no maps. i just like spamming the foundry
rebelman wrote:DiM wrote:
clearly mistaken. i no nothing about no maps. i just like spamming the foundry
Gimil's spelling ability has clearly influenced you, so the spamming was not entirely in vain
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users