Conquer Club

• when playing speed games or casual somtimes the random drop can be unfair to one player, my suggestion is to add a lucky tag in the ratings area for such occasions

• this doesnt improve "gameplay" it is just a better tag than poor strategy or another.

when someone gets a really lucky drop you can tag it

• xxxxxxx (you can obviously delete this for bug reports)
• xxxxxxx

KernowWarrior wrote:A lucky and unlucky tag would be good, I just finished a game, where I won nearly every roll, and my opponent lost nearly every roll. He/she only lost the game through bad luck, nothing to do with my or his/her skill, I certanly would have given him an unlucky tag and im sure he/she would have given me a ,lucky git, tag.

KernowWarrior wrote:A lucky and unlucky tag would be good, I just finished a game, where I won nearly every roll, and my opponent lost nearly every roll. He/she only lost the game through bad luck, nothing to do with my or his/her skill, I certanly would have given him an unlucky tag and im sure he/she would have given me a ,lucky git, tag.

Woodruff wrote:Frankly, this suggestion doesn't even make basic sense. Whether someone is lucky or not is entirely game-dependent. I could be incredibly lucky in one game while at the same time being thoroughly unlucky in another game at the same time.

KernowWarrior wrote:Ok if lucky and unlucky doesnt cover it how about 'had good dice' & 'had bad dice' We already have tags that have nothing to do with the game like 'silent' so why not ones that reflect how that game went.

KernowWarrior wrote:The dice are random, so they say (I still have my doubts ) so luck or lack of it has more relevance than 'silent' where tags are concerned.
'

karelpietertje wrote:

Woodruff wrote:Frankly, this suggestion doesn't even make basic sense. Whether someone is lucky or not is entirely game-dependent. I could be incredibly lucky in one game while at the same time being thoroughly unlucky in another game at the same time.

You are explaining precisely why a lucky and an unlucky button should be made.
getting luck or bad luck is entirely game-dependant, and anybody could get it. Somebody who has absolutely no skill could win a game against somebody who doesn't make mistakes.
When somebody else looks back at the game however, he might get a wrong idea about who is the better player.
This is where the lucky/unlucky buttons would come in handy. they will be a way of showing that the winning or losing had nothing to do with skill, but dice.
kp

karelpietertje wrote:You are explaining precisely why a lucky and an unlucky button should be made.
getting luck or bad luck is entirely game-dependant, and anybody could get it. Somebody who has absolutely no skill could win a game against somebody who doesn't make mistakes.
When somebody else looks back at the game however, he might get a wrong idea about who is the better player.
This is where the lucky/unlucky buttons would come in handy. they will be a way of showing that the winning or losing had nothing to do with skill, but dice.

Woodruff wrote:

KernowWarrior wrote:A lucky and unlucky tag would be good, I just finished a game, where I won nearly every roll, and my opponent lost nearly every roll. He/she only lost the game through bad luck, nothing to do with my or his/her skill, I certanly would have given him an unlucky tag and im sure he/she would have given me a ,lucky git, tag.

Frankly, this suggestion doesn't even make basic sense. Whether someone is lucky or not is entirely game-dependent. I could be incredibly lucky in one game while at the same time being thoroughly unlucky in another game at the same time. There would be no sense at all to have "lucky" and "unlucky" tags, as they would not be descriptive of anything at all, in truth.