The Neon Peon wrote:Thoughts?
I think there have been way better suggestions for medals, and this fits out of the others. They are all for a type of game, not a combination of game types like this one is. Why change the concept of medals by making them more specific? Shall we make a 2 player, 3 player, 4 player... medal for all the game types, then? You play them all differently.
True enough that the different number-of-players does change the strategy. Personally, I don't see why NOT have many (such as you suggest).
The Neon Peon wrote:Secondly, you don't have to eliminate everyone else in a standard game either to win. Same as a terminator, so that last comment bears no meaning.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. Everyone else MUST be eliminated from a standard game in order to win. You personally don't have to do the "eliminating" (other than eliminating the final opponent), but they must all be beaten. Is it the same for terminator games (I don't know, as I don't play them)?
The Neon Peon wrote:P.S. I think the higher powers decided to not create more medals until it was obvious that these were not enough. To be honest... 3 people maxing out is nowhere near enough to show that there is a lack of medals.
I would agree that doesn't mean there is a lack of medals. My feeling though would be...what does it hurt? I don't personally particularly care about medals, but this specific suggestion I would probably like since I do happen to play a lot of 8-player games and am of the opinion that they require the most skill to win. Of course, I'm probably biased in that belief. (smile)
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:01 pm
