Disassociate rank from number of games completed

Why does rank have to be associated with number of completed games...it seems to me that points alone should be the criteria
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=471&t=6998
Mirak wrote:Why does rank have to be associated with number of completed games...it seems to me that points alone should be the criteria
kc-jake wrote:You're only one rank behind. By the time I hit sergeant, I was nearly a captain. And I'm a lieutenant, but I have been within 4 points of major. Just keep playing, you'll get there if you're really that good. The points start getting a lot harder to get around 1300 points.
kc-jake wrote: The points start getting a lot harder to get around 1300 points.
kc-jake wrote:The points start getting a lot harder to get around 1300 points.
MeDeFe wrote:Only one rank behind? I would have been a major a few times already over my last 8 or 10 games if it wasn't for the fact that you need a certain amount of finished games. and as a hint: I'm not yet a captain.
Pedronicus wrote:kc-jake wrote:The points start getting a lot harder to get around 1300 points.
stick yerself in my shoes - I would like to be awared points to three decimal places
AK_iceman wrote:kc-jake wrote:You're only one rank behind. By the time I hit sergeant, I was nearly a captain. And I'm a lieutenant, but I have been within 4 points of major. Just keep playing, you'll get there if you're really that good. The points start getting a lot harder to get around 1300 points.
Trying to recruit people to your self-proclaimed fanclub, eh kc?