Conquer Club

Posted: **Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:24 pm**

Concise description:

Specifics:

This will improve the following aspects of the site:

Posted: **Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:31 pm**

stahrgazer wrote:When rating, if you choose not to rate a portion, the system computes that as a bad rating, rather than ignoring it as a section not rated.

No it doesn't. Why is your 'teamwork' rating a 5.0 if only 6 of 36 people have given you a rating for it? If not being rated in a category counted as a bad rating in the system, you'd have a 'teamwork' rating of 0.8. It says, right at the top of your ratings page, how many people have rated you in each category.

Posted: **Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:32 pm**

hurray! the problem has been solved!

Posted: **Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:14 am**

Timminz wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:When rating, if you choose not to rate a portion, the system computes that as a bad rating, rather than ignoring it as a section not rated.

No it doesn't. Why is your 'teamwork' rating a 5.0 if only 6 of 36 people have given you a rating for it? If not being rated in a category counted as a bad rating in the system, you'd have a 'teamwork' rating of 0.8. It says, right at the top of your ratings page, how many people have rated you in each category.

The system automatically detects whether you qualify to receive a teamwork rating. However, it's very likely that the other 4 are averaged regardless.

L

Posted: **Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:47 am**

Yeah - you got your "concise description" completely opposite dude. No rating IS no rating, not zero stars...

Conquer Club

Blank rating equals Bad Rating

Blank rating equals Bad Rating

Re: Blank rating equals Bad Rating

Re: Blank rating equals Bad Rating

Re: Blank rating equals Bad Rating

Re: Blank rating equals Bad Rating