Page 1 of 1

[SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:22 pm
by Gnome de Guerre
New Game Options To Enable/Disable Following Territory Card Effects:
  • Extend +2 Bonus Armies awarded on territories for which cards are played to any player, not just the player who trades in the cards.
  • Set the Territory Card Army Bonus to anything from 0 to 7 (2 is default).

Specifics:
  • +X Bonus Armies are placed on every territory for which a card is played.
  • These territories need not be occupied by the current card-playing player; they may belong to any player, or the neutral player.
  • These +X Bonus Armies are awarded to whoever controls the territory for which a card is played.
  • The number of +X Bonus Armies may vary from game to game and player to player.
  • The base number of +X Bonus Armies awarded to the occupying player of a territory for which a card is played may be set at the beginning of a new game.
  • This number may range from 0 to 7.
  • Default is 0. (Yes, zero; see below.)
  • The adjusted number of +Y Bonus Armies awarded IN ADDITION to the base +X Bonus Armies can also be set at the start of a new game.
  • THESE +Y Bonus Armies are only awarded to occupier of a territory for which a card is played if that occupying force belongs to the player trading in these cards.
  • This number may also range from 0 to 7.
  • Default is 2. (Just like in normal Risk.)

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Playing a set of cards may have the (un)intended result of building a huge wall of Neutral Armies, giving a large force to your opponent, or hooking up a teammate.
  • Holding off on playing a set of cards until you occupy certain of their territories becomes doubly more important.

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:32 pm
by Timminz
This is quite the suggestion. Very original, which is always nice, and it doesn't seem stupid either. I would play this setting.

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:45 pm
by AndyDufresne
Long ago this suggestion came out I believe, but it was never commented on and wasn't as developed as this. :)


--Andy

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:39 pm
by FabledIntegral
I wouldn't mind it being +1 for your opponent but +2 for yourself, no other options, as I would never play bonus territories giving +3 or more, etc.

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:25 am
by Sir. Ricco
FabledIntegral wrote:I wouldn't mind it being +1 for your opponent but +2 for yourself, no other options, as I would never play bonus territories giving +3 or more, etc.

I was acutely thinking about this the other day. But I agree with FabledIntegral on his bonus veiw.
In short I like it and I like to see it developed.

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:09 am
by lozzini
i agree with the whole do it thing... but not with too large a bonus... maybe 4 for you and 2 for an opponent

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:20 am
by BENJIKAT IS DEAD
Nice idea, but as previous posters hav said it needs to be reigned in a bit.

In an extreme case you could get with your original suggestion, if I understand it correctly, up to 31 extra armies with a very lucky turn 4 mixed set. Events like that just don't make the game very fun IMO.

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:37 pm
by Soloman
really interesting idea I think I like it it is bold and new...

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:05 pm
by Sir. Ricco
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:Nice idea, but as previous posters hav said it needs to be reigned in a bit.

In an extreme case you could get with your original suggestion, if I understand it correctly, up to 31 extra armies with a very lucky turn 4 mixed set. Events like that just don't make the game very fun IMO.

I think anything above 3 is a little out of hand, anything above 5 is just crazy, but hey it could be fun. It might put more importance on taking the territory on your card. Who knows 4 reds might be better then mixed. :)

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:03 am
by Soloman
this definitely deserves further discussion and development...

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:05 am
by lozzini
quite few few ppl are saying this is good in chtt... but they dont seem to be voting... remember to vote yes if u want to ppl

Re: [SUGGESTION] Option(s) for Territory Card Effects

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:48 pm
by Soloman
lozzini wrote:quite few few ppl are saying this is good in chtt... but they dont seem to be voting... remember to vote yes if u want to ppl
It is always best to 1st discuss things like this in GD 1st that way you can build buzz...