Conquer Club

Some times games are decided very much by dice, im not complaining about this as the dice tend to be on my side, but especially on little maps maybe we could put a limit on the number of points that a player can lose due to this luck factor?

In this game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?gam ... 2#map-cell it took me 5 rounds before i managed to defeat 3 of his armies and take a territory (i only managed to take 1 territory in the whole game my dice were so poor.....), meanwhile he was ripping through my armies with ease. Im not complaining about the dice as i have found them to always even out, but to then lose 77 points due to this i can only see as unfair. Im sure people will say ''if you lose to a cook you deserve to lose points" which of course is true, but i cant see how its fair for him to take 77 points from me when i only recieve 100 for winning an 8 player game.........

ultimately i would like the limit of points to lose to drop from 100 to maybe 40/50 in 1 v 1 games or on smaller maps......

Just don't play it.

firth4eva wrote:Just don't play it.

why? I like it and its fun! plus im good at it, having only lost 2 out of 15 games with 1 v 1 on that map.......

so that is not a particularly good solution.

I like the idea, but I think the score system should be changed in general

Don't play it or play it and stop whining. You're playing it at your own risk so don't start crying when you lose.

Just don't play against cooks! Play against better players!

Perhaps U like that cooks do a lot of missed turns and U can easier get points....

If U do, than this is not good tactic, because on lose against cook, U lost points that U get in 4 wins against cook!

Play against better players, the risiko is smaller!

tito81 wrote:Just don't play against cooks! Play against better players!

Perhaps U like that cooks do a lot of missed turns and U can easier get points....

If U do, than this is not good tactic, because on lose against cook, U lost points that U get in 4 wins against cook!

Play against better players, the risiko is smaller!

How on earth can i pick who joins my games?!??! i play against all ranks, just anyone who joins my games so that was a stupid thing to say.

firth4eva wrote:Don't play it or play it and stop whining. You're playing it at your own risk so don't start crying when you lose.

you are a dickhead. At no point was i "crying" i was making a suggestion using examples in my case to put reasons forward as to why it should be changed to what i suggest. It does not improve the site to say retarded things like what you are saying.

There already is a maximum - 100 points

If it was any lower there would not be enough incentive to play against good opponents, since you wouldn't be risking many points to get a relatively easy win.

Hey boy, U don't need to call me a dickhead at all!
U can allways check allready wayting for player games, and there are allways a lot of games without cooks !

tito81 wrote:Hey boy, U don't need to call me a dickhead at all!
U can allways check allready wayting for player games, and there are allways a lot of games without cooks !

i didnt call u that, it was firth i did. there are generally not the settings i like tho, i refuse to play unlimited forts on doodle earth, and i also dont like flat rate so that means games rarely come up that i want to play, so i set up my own and wait to see who joins..........