1756311543
1756311543 Conquer Club • View topic - Auto-Joining/Starting Games
Conquer Club

Auto-Joining/Starting Games

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Auto-Joining/Starting Games

Postby Paddyohale on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:17 pm

Suggestion Idea:
To "join" players to games that are already awaiting players if the settings are identical in the two games.

Details:
Say two people want to play a Standard Sequential Escalating No Fog Casual game on Classic. They both start a game with these settings. Both games go up on the board, and both appear if you search for them. Since both players are effectively awaiting the same game, it would cut down massively on the sheer number of games awaiting players at any one time (and cut down on the time before players start a game after joining) by combining these two "waiting for players" games into one game and letting it start.

Obviously this is not limited to just 2 player games, if N players have created the same N player game and are all waiting, you could join all N together into one game and it would start immediately.

Why Needed:
This will cut down massively on the number of games awaiting players by joining a player to an already existing game with the same specifics. There are 15 pages of games waiting for players at the moment, ones on the 15th page have no chance of being joined unless someone specifically searches for that game.

Other Notable Points:
I think this should only apply to Public games, so players can still create games for themself and their friends and not worry about random people being placed in that game.. I also think that once a game has a second player joining it, that game should not be considered for "auto-combining" with other games.

Discuss.

Pad.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Paddyohale
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:29 pm

Postby Hotdoggie on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:38 pm

Sounds like a solid idea - ofc ignore lists will have to be considered in this process, but imo it would make a lot of sence.
PERSONAL BEST...
Rank: Colonel
Score: 2802
Place: 120
Date: 16 / 2 / 2009
Lieutenant Hotdoggie
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:29 am
Location: Doodle Earth

Postby Herakilla on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:59 pm

some players, like me, prefer being red
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
Lieutenant Herakilla
 
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Postby TaCktiX on Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:34 pm

That would be a coding nightmare. And then once it's coded, testing every time a game is created to see if it matches another one of the 1000's of games going will create a hefty server load.

Another thing I've noticed in my short tenure on CC is that a number of Premium people start 3-4 games with identical settings, and end up with completely different teams in most of them. You'd ALSO have to check to make sure the game creator wasn't the same one merging them, or that would defeat the purpose of the person making multiple identical games in the first place.

Cutting down on the number of games that never get joined is a good thing, but the number of double-checks, amount of coding, etc. would make it extremely difficult to add and moderate properly.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD

Postby lackattack on Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:16 pm

Hmm.. I think this would actually be doable from a coding standpoint.

When you attempt to create a game, it will query for a public game with matching settings and instead join you into that game provided you are not already in it.

This will still allow premiums to continue making multiple similar games.

As Herakilla pointed out people won't be able to insist on being red, but I'm okay with that.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class lackattack
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Postby tenio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:33 pm

good idea !


but because some people get very made about stupid things... there should be a setting in your profile that allows you to disable this "finder thing"
User avatar
Cadet tenio
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:23 pm
Location: The Moon

Postby Herakilla on Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:37 am

lackattack wrote:Hmm.. I think this would actually be doable from a coding standpoint.

When you attempt to create a game, it will query for a public game with matching settings and instead join you into that game provided you are not already in it.

This will still allow premiums to continue making multiple similar games.

As Herakilla pointed out people won't be able to insist on being red, but I'm okay with that.


you can fix that with prefered colors!
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
Lieutenant Herakilla
 
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Postby Paddyohale on Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:33 pm

It was only an idea I had as to how to reduce the number of "waiting for players" games, feel free to add slight improvements to it! I had indeed forgotten about ignoring players who start multiple games with the same settings, thanks TaC.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Paddyohale
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:29 pm

Postby lozzini on Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:41 pm

lackattack wrote:Hmm.. I think this would actually be doable from a coding standpoint.

When you attempt to create a game, it will query for a public game with matching settings and instead join you into that game provided you are not already in it.

This will still allow premiums to continue making multiple similar games.

As Herakilla pointed out people won't be able to insist on being red, but I'm okay with that.


how about when you create the new game it gives you an option of joining one of the ready available ones so if you do want to be a certain colour or something that is still an option
Top Rank: Captain
Top Score: 1835
Top Pos: 1707
Nothing ventured... nothing gained
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class lozzini
 
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:46 am
Location: Closer than you may think

Postby demon7896 on Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:06 pm

the salvation of the 2 players....
Image
MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON MY ENEMIES...
CAUSE I SURE AS HELL WON'T!
User avatar
Private demon7896
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Postby wrightfan123 on Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:30 pm

Personally, I think this is the dumbest idea in the world. What if I'm a Private 1st Class on a winning streak looking to up my rank, and the player with the identical game is SkyT? Or what if they have a thousand negative feedback and they're either going to just abuse me or deadbeat. Or what if I simply don't want to play them because I did a little research before joining the game and that person is the one on the winning streak. Or what if I'm a non-premium and I set this game up for me and a friend? The possibilities for reasons this is a dumb idea are endless. I think that, like the "updated" Classic map, this feature would cause disruption, confusion, and would be taken off almost immediately. So, personally, I hate this idea and would fight it tooth and nail. And if you're so angry about the long list of Join A Games, why not just use Game Finder like I do?

-W123
User avatar
Corporal wrightfan123
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Looking over every baseball team's schedule to try to determine who will win the World Series.

Postby lackattack on Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:23 pm

nice idea lozzini,

giving the option would be less effective in minimizing the # of open games but it would let you check out your opponents beforehand.

it could look like this:

hey dude, there are already games out there like the one you want to start! why don't you join one of these instead:

..... game listing .....

button: no thanks, i really want to start another game
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class lackattack
 
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Postby insomniacdude on Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:04 pm

lackattack wrote:nice idea lozzini,

giving the option would be less effective in minimizing the # of open games but it would let you check out your opponents beforehand.

it could look like this:

hey dude, there are already games out there like the one you want to start! why don't you join one of these instead:

..... game listing .....

button: no thanks, i really want to start another game


In that case, I'd fully support the option. If it were mandatory, then we'd get the problem wright outlines right above your post.
User avatar
Cadet insomniacdude
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:14 am


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users